356 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25498851)
1. The C-MAC® video laryngoscope is superior to the direct laryngoscope for the rescue of failed first-attempt intubations in the emergency department.
Sakles JC; Mosier JM; Patanwala AE; Dicken JM; Kalin L; Javedani PP
J Emerg Med; 2015 Mar; 48(3):280-6. PubMed ID: 25498851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A comparison of the C-MAC video laryngoscope to the Macintosh direct laryngoscope for intubation in the emergency department.
Sakles JC; Mosier J; Chiu S; Cosentino M; Kalin L
Ann Emerg Med; 2012 Dec; 60(6):739-48. PubMed ID: 22560464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Learning curves for direct laryngoscopy and GlideScope® video laryngoscopy in an emergency medicine residency.
Sakles JC; Mosier J; Patanwala AE; Dicken J
West J Emerg Med; 2014 Nov; 15(7):930-7. PubMed ID: 25493156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The Utility of the C-MAC as a Direct Laryngoscope for Intubation in the Emergency Department.
Sakles JC; Mosier JM; Patanwala AE; Arcaris B; Dicken JM
J Emerg Med; 2016 Oct; 51(4):349-357. PubMed ID: 27471132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A comparison of the GlideScope video laryngoscope to the C-MAC video laryngoscope for intubation in the emergency department.
Mosier J; Chiu S; Patanwala AE; Sakles JC
Ann Emerg Med; 2013 Apr; 61(4):414-420.e1. PubMed ID: 23374414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Clinical Experience With the C-MAC and GlideScope in a Pediatric Emergency Department Over a 10-Year Period.
Pacheco GS; Patanwala AE; Mendelson JS; Sakles JC
Pediatr Emerg Care; 2021 Dec; 37(12):e1098-e1103. PubMed ID: 31503130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Improvement in glottic visualisation by using the C-MAC PM video laryngoscope as a first-line device for out-of-hospital emergency tracheal intubation: An observational study.
Hossfeld B; Frey K; Doerges V; Lampl L; Helm M
Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2015 Jun; 32(6):425-31. PubMed ID: 25886716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison Between Direct and Video-assisted Laryngoscopy for Intubations in a Pediatric Emergency Department.
Eisenberg MA; Green-Hopkins I; Werner H; Nagler J
Acad Emerg Med; 2016 Aug; 23(8):870-7. PubMed ID: 27208690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The use of a video laryngoscope by emergency medicine residents is associated with a reduction in esophageal intubations in the emergency department.
Sakles JC; Javedani PP; Chase E; Garst-Orozco J; Guillen-Rodriguez JM; Stolz U
Acad Emerg Med; 2015 Jun; 22(6):700-7. PubMed ID: 25996773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effectiveness of the C-MAC video laryngoscope in the management of unexpected failed intubations.
Kilicaslan A; Topal A; Tavlan A; Erol A; Otelcioglu S
Braz J Anesthesiol; 2014; 64(1):62-5. PubMed ID: 24565390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of success rates between two video laryngoscope systems used in a prehospital clinical trial.
Burnett AM; Frascone RJ; Wewerka SS; Kealey SE; Evens ZN; Griffith KR; Salzman JG
Prehosp Emerg Care; 2014; 18(2):231-8. PubMed ID: 24400965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of the reusable standard GlideScope® video laryngoscope and the disposable cobalt GlideScope® video laryngoscope for tracheal intubation in an academic emergency department: a retrospective review.
Sakles JC; Patanwala AE; Mosier J; Dicken J; Holman N
Acad Emerg Med; 2014 Apr; 21(4):408-15. PubMed ID: 24730403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of the C-MAC video laryngoscope with direct Macintosh laryngoscopy in the emergency department.
Vassiliadis J; Tzannes A; Hitos K; Brimble J; Fogg T
Emerg Med Australas; 2015 Apr; 27(2):119-25. PubMed ID: 25640845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. GlideScope video laryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy in the emergency department: a propensity score-matched analysis.
Choi HJ; Kim YM; Oh YM; Kang HG; Yim HW; Jeong SH;
BMJ Open; 2015 May; 5(5):e007884. PubMed ID: 25968006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparing the McGrath Mac Video Laryngoscope and Direct Laryngoscopy for Prehospital Emergency Intubation in Air Rescue Patients: A Multicenter, Randomized, Controlled Trial.
Kreutziger J; Hornung S; Harrer C; Urschl W; Doppler R; Voelckel WG; Trimmel H
Crit Care Med; 2019 Oct; 47(10):1362-1370. PubMed ID: 31389835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Tracheal intubation in the emergency department: a comparison of GlideScope® video laryngoscopy to direct laryngoscopy in 822 intubations.
Sakles JC; Mosier JM; Chiu S; Keim SM
J Emerg Med; 2012 Apr; 42(4):400-5. PubMed ID: 21689899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparative effectiveness of the C-MAC video laryngoscope versus direct laryngoscopy in the setting of the predicted difficult airway.
Aziz MF; Dillman D; Fu R; Brambrink AM
Anesthesiology; 2012 Mar; 116(3):629-36. PubMed ID: 22261795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Video Laryngoscopy Compared to Augmented Direct Laryngoscopy in Adult Emergency Department Tracheal Intubations: A National Emergency Airway Registry (NEAR) Study.
Brown CA; Kaji AH; Fantegrossi A; Carlson JN; April MD; Kilgo RW; Walls RM;
Acad Emerg Med; 2020 Feb; 27(2):100-108. PubMed ID: 31957174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Use of the GlideScope Ranger Video Laryngoscope for Emergency Intubation in the Prehospital Setting: A Randomized Control Trial.
Trimmel H; Kreutziger J; Fitzka R; Szüts S; Derdak C; Koch E; Erwied B; Voelckel WG
Crit Care Med; 2016 Jul; 44(7):e470-6. PubMed ID: 27002277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of the Storz CMAC®, Glidescope® GVL, AirTraq®, King LTS-D™, and direct laryngoscopy in a simulated difficult airway.
Nelson JG; Wewerka SS; Woster CM; Burnett AM; Salzman JG; Frascone RJ
Am J Emerg Med; 2013 Mar; 31(3):589-92. PubMed ID: 23347722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
