166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25498926)
1. Likelihood ratio methods for forensic comparison of evaporated gasoline residues.
Vergeer P; Bolck A; Peschier LJ; Berger CE; Hendrikse JN
Sci Justice; 2014 Dec; 54(6):401-11. PubMed ID: 25498926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of gasolines using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry and target ion response.
Barnes AT; Dolan JA; Kuk RJ; Siegel JA
J Forensic Sci; 2004 Sep; 49(5):1018-23. PubMed ID: 15461104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Study of acidified ignitable liquid residues in fire debris by solid-phase microextraction with gas chromatography and mass spectrometry.
Martín-Alberca C; García-Ruiz C; Delémont O
J Sep Sci; 2015 Sep; 38(18):3218-3227. PubMed ID: 26179121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Application of an HS-MS for the detection of ignitable liquids from fire debris.
Ferreiro-González M; Ayuso J; Álvarez JA; Palma M; Barroso CG
Talanta; 2015 Sep; 142():150-6. PubMed ID: 26003705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Chemical fingerprinting of gasoline. 2. Comparison of unevaporated and evaporated automotive gasoline samples.
Sandercock PM; Du Pasquier E
Forensic Sci Int; 2004 Feb; 140(1):43-59. PubMed ID: 15013165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Research progress on interference in the identification of accelerants in a fire scene].
Yin G; Qian P; Liqiu F; Jin J; Liu L; Zhang J
Se Pu; 2022 May; 40(5):401-408. PubMed ID: 35477999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of an untargeted chemometric approach for the source inference of ignitable liquids in forensic science.
de Figueiredo M; Cordella CBY; Jouan-Rimbaud Bouveresse D; Archer X; Bégué JM; Rutledge DN
Forensic Sci Int; 2019 Feb; 295():8-18. PubMed ID: 30553191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Study of the Weathering Process of Gasoline by eNose.
Aliaño-González MJ; Ferreiro-González M; Barbero GF; Ayuso J; Palma M; Barroso CG
Sensors (Basel); 2018 Jan; 18(1):. PubMed ID: 29304020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect of evaporation and matrix interferences on the association of simulated ignitable liquid residues to the corresponding liquid standard.
Prather KR; McGuffin VL; Waddell Smith R
Forensic Sci Int; 2012 Oct; 222(1-3):242-51. PubMed ID: 22727574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Class-conditional feature modeling for ignitable liquid classification with substantial substrate contribution in fire debris analysis.
Lopatka M; Sigman ME; Sjerps MJ; Williams MR; Vivó-Truyols G
Forensic Sci Int; 2015 Jul; 252():177-86. PubMed ID: 26005858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effects of Fire Suppression Agents and Weathering in the Analysis of Fire Debris by HS-MS eNose.
Falatová B; Ferreiro-González M; Martín-Alberca C; Kačíková D; Galla Š; Palma M; G Barroso C
Sensors (Basel); 2018 Jun; 18(6):. PubMed ID: 29899213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A method for forensic gasoline comparison in fire debris samples: A numerical likelihood ratio system.
Vergeer P; Hendrikse JN; Grutters MMP; Peschier LJC
Sci Justice; 2020 Sep; 60(5):438-450. PubMed ID: 32873384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Use of a solid absorbent and an accelerant detection canine for the detection of ignitable liquids burned in a structure fire.
Nowlan M; Stuart AW; Basara GJ; Sandercock PM
J Forensic Sci; 2007 May; 52(3):643-8. PubMed ID: 17397503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Analysis of household ignitable liquids and their post-combustion weathered residues using compound-specific gas chromatography-combustion-isotope ratio mass spectrometry.
Schwartz Z; An Y; Konstantynova KI; Jackson GP
Forensic Sci Int; 2013 Dec; 233(1-3):365-73. PubMed ID: 24314542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The evaluation of the extent of transporting or "tracking" an identifiable ignitable liquid (gasoline) throughout fire scenes during the investigative process.
Armstrong A; Babrauskas V; Holmes DL; Martin C; Powell R; Riggs S; Young LD
J Forensic Sci; 2004 Jul; 49(4):741-8. PubMed ID: 15317188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Detection of gasoline on arson suspects' hands.
Muller D; Levy A; Shelef R
Forensic Sci Int; 2011 Mar; 206(1-3):150-4. PubMed ID: 20729020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of a headspace solid-phase microextraction method for the analysis of ignitable liquids in fire debris.
Fettig I; Krüger S; Deubel JH; Werrel M; Raspe T; Piechotta C
J Forensic Sci; 2014 May; 59(3):743-9. PubMed ID: 24329005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Recognition of gasoline in fire debris using machine learning: Part I, application of random forest, gradient boosting, support vector machine, and naïve bayes.
Bogdal C; Schellenberg R; Höpli O; Bovens M; Lory M
Forensic Sci Int; 2022 Feb; 331():111146. PubMed ID: 34968789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Analytical tools for the analysis of fire debris. A review: 2008-2015.
Martín-Alberca C; Ortega-Ojeda FE; García-Ruiz C
Anal Chim Acta; 2016 Jul; 928():1-19. PubMed ID: 27251852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Exploratory study on the possibility to link gasoline samples sharing a common source after alteration by evaporation or combustion.
de Figueiredo M; Jouan-Rimbaud Bouveresse D; Cordella CBY; Archer X; Bégué JM; Rutledge DN
Forensic Sci Int; 2019 Aug; 301():190-201. PubMed ID: 31174133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
