129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25498943)
1. Letter to editor in response to editorial by Risinger et al.
Buckleton J; Evett I; Weir B
Sci Justice; 2014 Dec; 54(6):510. PubMed ID: 25498943
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Letter to the editor regarding Davidson et al.
Haynes RB
Am J Med; 2006 Feb; 119(2):186; author reply 186. PubMed ID: 16443441
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Response to letter to the editor by eisner et al.
Teshima Y; Takahashi N; Saikawa T; Hara M; Yasunaga S; Hidaka S; Sakata T
J Mol Cell Cardiol; 2000 Jul; 32(7):1379. PubMed ID: 10860778
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. N400, the reference electrode, and the semantic activation in prime-task experiments: a reply to Dombrowski and Heil (2006).
Marí-Beffa P; Catena A; Valdés B; Cullen D; Houghton G
Brain Res; 2007 May; 1147():209-12. PubMed ID: 17328874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. In reply to letter to the editor by Dr Willems et al. re: Eccles et al. Change in diffusion weighted MRI during liver cancer radiotherapy: Preliminary observations.
Eccles C; Haider MA; Dawson LA
Acta Oncol; 2010; 49(2):256-7. PubMed ID: 20017663
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Letter to the editor concerning "Radial arm maze performance of rats following repeated low-level microwave radiation exposure" by Cobb et al. [BEMS, 2004, 25:49-57] and "letter to the editor" by Lai [BEMS, 2005, 26:81].
Cassel JC
Bioelectromagnetics; 2005 Oct; 26(7):526-7; author reply 528. PubMed ID: 16142764
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Letter from Waldum et al. commenting on the editorial by Andrew et al and responses.
Wright NA
J Pathol; 1999 Nov; 189(3):439-40. PubMed ID: 10547608
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Letter to the Editor: Sources of bias and need for caution in interpreting the results of Spoth et al.'s (2017) PROSPER study.
Gorman DM
Psychol Med; 2018 Mar; 48(4):694-696. PubMed ID: 28889806
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. RE: J Kiffer et al. - Letter to the Editor regarding F Schwarz et al. - Are single fractions of radiotherapy suitable for plantar fasciitis?
Roos DE; Ball DL; Burmeister BH; Fisher RJ
Australas Radiol; 2005 Jun; 49(3):257. PubMed ID: 15932475
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Reply to M.V. Meng's Letter to the Editor re: H. Baumert et al. The use of polymer (Hem-o-lok) clips for management of the renal hilum during laparoscopic nephrectomy. Eur Urol 2006;49:816-9 and P.L. Steinberg et al. re: H. Baumert et al. The use of polymer (Hem-o-lok) clips for management of the renal hilum during laparoscopic nephrectomy. Eur Urol 2006;49:816-9. Eur Urol 2007;51:572-3.
O'Kane HF; Nambirajan T
Eur Urol; 2007 May; 51(5):1449. PubMed ID: 17229516
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Response to "letter to the editor: comments on a recent article by Burgos et al".
Burgos JM; Ellington BA; Varela MF
J Dairy Sci; 2006 Mar; 89(3):811. PubMed ID: 16507672
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Author's response to letter to the editor by Kauffman et al. published in JNI 212/1-2, June 2009.
Vécsei L; Losonczi E; Bencsik K; Rajda C
J Neuroimmunol; 2009 Dec; 217(1-2):102. PubMed ID: 19732965
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Letter to the Editor: early intervention in psychosis: a response to McGorry et al. (2010).
Castle D; Bosanac P; Patton G
Psychol Med; 2010 Dec; 40(12):2108-9. PubMed ID: 20735883
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Comments on "Efficacy of neck stabilization exercises for neck pain" and Response to Letter to the Editor by van Es et al.
van Es P; Damen J; Runhaar J
J Rehabil Med; 2010 Jan; 42(1):93; author reply 93. PubMed ID: 20111851
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Response to a letter to the Editor by Dr. David Egilman and Mr. John Schilling regarding the article by Donovan et al. (2011).
Donovan E; Sahmel J; Scott P; Paustenbach D
Crit Rev Toxicol; 2012 Feb; 42(2):173-183. PubMed ID: 26479716
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Reply: letter to the editor in response to Morton et al. (2007) Carcinogenesis, 28, 1759-1764.
Bailey JE; Skare JA
Carcinogenesis; 2008 Sep; 29(9):1851. PubMed ID: 18218828
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Author Response to the Letter to the Editor by Ortegon et al, "Radiologic Visual Journey Through the Grayscale. The Observation Bias".
Cooke EA
Acad Radiol; 2023 Jan; 30(1):143. PubMed ID: 36192269
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Letter to the editor response by Vora et al.
Vora VP; Crawford AH
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Jan; 33(1):120-1. PubMed ID: 18165759
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Letter in response to the letter to the editor of archives of toxicology by Woegerbauer et al. (2016).
Wilhelm R; Kohl C; Schiemann J; Steinberg P
Arch Toxicol; 2016 Dec; 90(12):3133-3137. PubMed ID: 27709271
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Letter to the editor: A response to the comments of Silanikove et al. (2015).
Tomazi T; Gonçalves JL; Barreiro JR; Arcari MA; Dos Santos MV
J Dairy Sci; 2015 Nov; 98(11):7423-5. PubMed ID: 26476334
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
