These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

311 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25499057)

  • 1. Highly reflective reasoners show no signs of belief inhibition.
    Svedholm-Häkkinen AM
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2015 Jan; 154():69-76. PubMed ID: 25499057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Belief inhibition in children's reasoning: memory-based evidence.
    Steegen S; De Neys W
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2012 Jun; 112(2):231-42. PubMed ID: 22402412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A diffusion model analysis of belief bias: Different cognitive mechanisms explain how cognitive abilities and thinking styles contribute to conflict resolution in reasoning.
    Schubert AL; Ferreira MB; Mata A; Riemenschneider B
    Cognition; 2021 Jun; 211():104629. PubMed ID: 33626418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Thinking in a foreign language distorts allocation of cognitive effort: Evidence from reasoning.
    Białek M; Muda R; Stewart K; Niszczota P; Pieńkosz D
    Cognition; 2020 Dec; 205():104420. PubMed ID: 33032818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Logic and belief across the lifespan: the rise and fall of belief inhibition during syllogistic reasoning.
    De Neys W; Van Gelder E
    Dev Sci; 2009 Jan; 12(1):123-30. PubMed ID: 19120420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Belief inhibition during thinking: not always winning but at least taking part.
    De Neys W; Franssens S
    Cognition; 2009 Oct; 113(1):45-61. PubMed ID: 19703685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The logic-bias effect: The role of effortful processing in the resolution of belief-logic conflict.
    Howarth S; Handley SJ; Walsh C
    Mem Cognit; 2016 Feb; 44(2):330-49. PubMed ID: 26390872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Individual differences in working memory capacity and resistance to belief bias in syllogistic reasoning.
    Robison MK; Unsworth N
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2017 Aug; 70(8):1471-1484. PubMed ID: 27173000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Dual processing in reasoning: two systems but one reasoner.
    De Neys W
    Psychol Sci; 2006 May; 17(5):428-33. PubMed ID: 16683931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The neural correlates of belief-bias inhibition: the impact of logic training.
    Luo J; Tang X; Zhang E; Stupple EJ
    Biol Psychol; 2014 Dec; 103():276-82. PubMed ID: 25263609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Do smart people have better intuitions?
    Thompson VA; Pennycook G; Trippas D; Evans JSBT
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2018 Jul; 147(7):945-961. PubMed ID: 29975089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Who resists belief-biased inferences? The role of individual differences in reasoning strategies, working memory, and attentional focus.
    de Chantal PL; Newman IR; Thompson V; Markovits H
    Mem Cognit; 2020 May; 48(4):655-671. PubMed ID: 31792857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The 'whys' and 'whens' of individual differences in thinking biases.
    De Neys W; Bonnefon JF
    Trends Cogn Sci; 2013 Apr; 17(4):172-8. PubMed ID: 23490722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Reasoning strategy vs cognitive capacity as predictors of individual differences in reasoning performance.
    Thompson VA; Markovits H
    Cognition; 2021 Dec; 217():104866. PubMed ID: 34450394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Interactions between inferential strategies and belief bias.
    Markovits H; Brisson J; de Chantal PL; Thompson VA
    Mem Cognit; 2017 Oct; 45(7):1182-1192. PubMed ID: 28608194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Belief-bias reasoning in non-clinical delusion-prone individuals.
    Anandakumar T; Connaughton E; Coltheart M; Langdon R
    J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry; 2017 Sep; 56():71-78. PubMed ID: 28318497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The bright homunculus in our head: Individual differences in intuitive sensitivity to logical validity.
    Ghasemi O; Handley S; Howarth S
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2022 Mar; 75(3):508-535. PubMed ID: 34427470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cognitive control in belief-laden reasoning during conclusion processing: an ERP study.
    Luo J; Liu X; Stupple EJ; Zhang E; Xiao X; Jia L; Yang Q; Li H; Zhang Q
    Int J Psychol; 2013; 48(3):224-31. PubMed ID: 22721259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Individual differences in syllogistic reasoning: deduction rules or mental models?
    Galotti KM; Baron J; Sabini JP
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 1986 Mar; 115(1):16-25. PubMed ID: 2937871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Using forced choice to test belief bias in syllogistic reasoning.
    Trippas D; Verde MF; Handley SJ
    Cognition; 2014 Dec; 133(3):586-600. PubMed ID: 25218460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.