BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25499549)

  • 1. Non-selective and selective enrichment media for the recovery of Clostridium difficile from chopped beef.
    Chai C; Lee KS; Lee D; Lee S; Oh SW
    J Microbiol Methods; 2015 Feb; 109():20-4. PubMed ID: 25499549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Improving culture media for the isolation of Clostridium difficile from compost.
    Dharmasena M; Jiang X
    Anaerobe; 2018 Jun; 51():1-7. PubMed ID: 29518533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Development of an optimized broth enrichment culture medium for the isolation of Clostridium difficile.
    Connor MC; McGrath JW; McMullan G; Marks N; Fairley DJ
    Anaerobe; 2018 Dec; 54():92-99. PubMed ID: 30118894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Use of a selective enrichment broth to recover Clostridium difficile from stool swabs stored under different conditions.
    Arroyo LG; Rousseau J; Willey BM; Low DE; Staempfli H; McGeer A; Weese JS
    J Clin Microbiol; 2005 Oct; 43(10):5341-3. PubMed ID: 16208013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Laboratory identification of anaerobic bacteria isolated on Clostridium difficile selective medium.
    Rodriguez C; Warszawski N; Korsak N; Taminiau B; Van Broeck J; Delmée M; Daube G
    Acta Microbiol Immunol Hung; 2016 Jun; 63(2):171-84. PubMed ID: 27352971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Improved recovery of Clostridium difficile spores with the incorporation of synthetic taurocholate in cycloserine-cefoxitin-fructose agar (CCFA).
    Foster NF; Riley TV
    Pathology; 2012 Jun; 44(4):354-6. PubMed ID: 22531346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of two selective media for the recovery of Clostridium difficile from environmental surfaces.
    Hill KA; Collins J; Wilson L; Perry JD; Gould FK
    J Hosp Infect; 2013 Feb; 83(2):164-6. PubMed ID: 23201396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of selective media for optimal recovery of Clostridium difficile from diarrhoeal stools.
    Niyogi SK; Pal SC
    Indian J Med Res; 1992 Jul; 95():181-3. PubMed ID: 1398806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. New selective medium for isolating Clostridium difficile from faeces.
    Aspinall ST; Hutchinson DN
    J Clin Pathol; 1992 Sep; 45(9):812-4. PubMed ID: 1401214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Development and Validation of a New Protocol for Detecting and Recovering Clostridium difficile from Meat Samples.
    Biasizzo M; Vadnjal S; Henigman U; Krizman M; Kirbis A; Jamnikar-Ciglenecki U
    J Food Prot; 2018 Apr; 81(4):561-568. PubMed ID: 29517350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Value of lysozyme agar incorporation and alkaline thioglycollate exposure for the environmental recovery of Clostridium difficile.
    Wilcox MH; Fawley WN; Parnell P
    J Hosp Infect; 2000 Jan; 44(1):65-9. PubMed ID: 10633056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Isolation and quantitation of Clostridium difficile in aqueous and fecal matter using two types of selective media.
    Housman ST; Banevicius MA; Lamb LM; Nicolau DP
    J Microbiol Immunol Infect; 2016 Jun; 49(3):445-7. PubMed ID: 26198865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Isolation of Clostridium difficile from faecal specimens--a comparison of chromID C. difficile agar and cycloserine-cefoxitin-fructose agar.
    Carson KC; Boseiwaqa LV; Thean SK; Foster NF; Riley TV
    J Med Microbiol; 2013 Sep; 62(Pt 9):1423-1427. PubMed ID: 23579394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Clostridium perfringens and Clostridium difficile in cooked beef sold in Côte d'Ivoire and their antimicrobial susceptibility.
    Kouassi KA; Dadie AT; N'Guessan KF; Dje KM; Loukou YG
    Anaerobe; 2014 Aug; 28():90-4. PubMed ID: 24944124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Clostridium difficile from healthy food animals: optimized isolation and prevalence.
    Thitaram SN; Frank JF; Lyon SA; Siragusa GR; Bailey JS; Lombard JE; Haley CA; Wagner BA; Dargatz DA; Fedorka-Cray PJ
    J Food Prot; 2011 Jan; 74(1):130-3. PubMed ID: 21219775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effective and reduced-cost modified selective medium for isolation of Clostridium difficile.
    Nerandzic MM; Donskey CJ
    J Clin Microbiol; 2009 Feb; 47(2):397-400. PubMed ID: 19073869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Comparison of three Clostridium difficile culture media: interest of enhancing spore germination media?].
    Rousseau C; Poilane I; Diakite F; Feghoul L; Cruaud P; Collignon A
    Pathol Biol (Paris); 2010 Feb; 58(1):58-61. PubMed ID: 19892495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A method for the growth and recovery of 17 species of Campylobacter and its subsequent application to inoculated beef.
    Lynch OA; Cagney C; McDowell DA; Duffy G
    J Microbiol Methods; 2010 Oct; 83(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 20547189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Clostridium difficile in raw products of animal origin.
    Jöbstl M; Heuberger S; Indra A; Nepf R; Köfer J; Wagner M
    Int J Food Microbiol; 2010 Mar; 138(1-2):172-5. PubMed ID: 20079946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of culture based methods for the isolation of Clostridium difficile from stool samples in a research setting.
    Lister M; Stevenson E; Heeg D; Minton NP; Kuehne SA
    Anaerobe; 2014 Aug; 28():226-9. PubMed ID: 25038491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.