These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

218 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25499587)

  • 1. Intracesarean insertion of the Copper T380A versus 6 weeks postcesarean: a randomized clinical trial.
    Lester F; Kakaire O; Byamugisha J; Averbach S; Fortin J; Maurer R; Goldberg A
    Contraception; 2015 Mar; 91(3):198-203. PubMed ID: 25499587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Current status of frameless anchored IUD for immediate intracesarean insertion.
    Wildemeersch D; Goldstuck ND; Hasskamp T
    Dev Period Med; 2016; 20(1):7-15. PubMed ID: 27416620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Postplacental insertion of the levonorgestrel intrauterine device after cesarean delivery vs. delayed insertion: a randomized controlled trial.
    Whitaker AK; Endres LK; Mistretta SQ; Gilliam ML
    Contraception; 2014 Jun; 89(6):534-9. PubMed ID: 24457061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Immediate postplacental insertion of an intrauterine contraceptive device during cesarean section.
    Çelen Ş; Sucak A; Yıldız Y; Danışman N
    Contraception; 2011 Sep; 84(3):240-3. PubMed ID: 21843687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Intrauterine devices: an effective alternative to oral hormonal contraception.
    Prescrire Int; 2009 Jun; 18(101):125-30. PubMed ID: 19637436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. IUD insertions following cesarean deliveries examined.
    Netw Res Triangle Park N C; 1984; 5(2):4-6. PubMed ID: 12265941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Post-placental intrauterine device insertion vs puerperal insertion in women undergoing caesarean delivery in Egypt: a 1 year randomised controlled trial.
    Bayoumi YA; Dakhly DMR; Bassiouny YA; Gouda HM; Hassan MA; Hassan AA
    Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care; 2020 Dec; 25(6):439-444. PubMed ID: 33006501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Immediate postplacental insertion of a copper intrauterine device: a pilot study to evaluate expulsion rate by mode of delivery.
    Sucak A; Ozcan S; Çelen Ş; Çağlar T; Göksu G; Danışman N
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2015 Sep; 15():202. PubMed ID: 26330364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Six-month and 1-year continuation rates following postpartum insertion of implants and intrauterine devices.
    Woo I; Seifert S; Hendricks D; Jamshidi RM; Burke AE; Fox MC
    Contraception; 2015 Dec; 92(6):532-5. PubMed ID: 26408376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A prospective cohort study comparing expulsion after postplacental insertion: the levonorgestrel versus the copper intrauterine device.
    Hinz EK; Murthy A; Wang B; Ryan N; Ades V
    Contraception; 2019 Aug; 100(2):101-105. PubMed ID: 31108053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Safety of copper T as contraceptive after caesarean section.
    Parikh V; Gandhi AS
    J Indian Med Assoc; 1989 May; 87(5):113-5. PubMed ID: 2600433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Placement of Levonorgestrel Intrauterine Device at the Time of Cesarean Delivery and the Effect on Breastfeeding Duration.
    Levi EE; Findley MK; Avila K; Bryant AG
    Breastfeed Med; 2018 Dec; 13(10):674-679. PubMed ID: 30376369
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Conventional manual technique of post placental IUD insertion versus intra-cesarean post placental introducer withdrawal IUD insertion technique: a new standardized technique for IUD insertion during cesarean section: a randomized controlled trial.
    Seleem M; Sedik MM; Megahed AMM; Nabil H
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2023 Jun; 23(1):474. PubMed ID: 37365489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Performances of copper T 380A and multiload copper 375/250 intrauterine contraceptive devices in a comparative clinical trial.
    Arowojolu AO; Otolorin EO; Ladipo OA
    Afr J Med Med Sci; 1995 Mar; 24(1):59-65. PubMed ID: 7495202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Acceptability of randomization to levonorgestrel versus copper intrauterine device among women requesting IUD insertion for contraception.
    Achilles SL; Chen BA; Lee JK; Gariepy AM; Creinin MD
    Contraception; 2015 Dec; 92(6):572-4. PubMed ID: 26297203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Vaginal misoprostol prior to intrauterine device insertion in women delivered only by elective cesarean section: a randomized double-blind clinical trial.
    Abdellah MS; Abbas AM; Hegazy AM; El-Nashar IM
    Contraception; 2017 Jun; 95(6):538-543. PubMed ID: 28088498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Immediate postpartum provision of long-acting reversible contraception.
    Goldthwaite LM; Shaw KA
    Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Dec; 27(6):460-4. PubMed ID: 26536209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A randomized clinical trial of the effect of intensive versus non-intensive counselling on discontinuation rates due to bleeding disturbances of three long-acting reversible contraceptives.
    Modesto W; Bahamondes MV; Bahamondes L
    Hum Reprod; 2014 Jul; 29(7):1393-9. PubMed ID: 24812309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Patient acceptability, continuation and complication rates with immediate postpartum levonorgestrel intrauterine device insertion at caesarean section and vaginal birth.
    Wojcik N; Watkins L; Nugent R
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2022 Oct; 62(5):773-778. PubMed ID: 35451065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Intrauterine device insertion during the postpartum period: a systematic review.
    Kapp N; Curtis KM
    Contraception; 2009 Oct; 80(4):327-36. PubMed ID: 19751855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.