These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25502317)
1. Effective dose conversion coefficients for health care provider exposed to pediatric and adult victims in radiological dispersal device incident. Han EY; Ha WH; Jin YW; Bolch WE; Lee C J Radiol Prot; 2015 Mar; 35(1):37-45. PubMed ID: 25502317 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Using handheld plastic scintillator detectors to triage individuals exposed to a radiological dispersal device. Manger RP; Hertel NE; Burgett EA; Ansari A Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2012 Jun; 150(1):101-8. PubMed ID: 22128361 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Organ S values and effective doses for family members exposed to adult patients following I-131 treatment: a Monte Carlo simulation study. Han EY; Lee C; Mcguire L; Brown TL; Bolch WE Med Phys; 2013 Aug; 40(8):083901. PubMed ID: 23927361 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A comprehensive dose reconstruction methodology for former rocketdyne/atomics international radiation workers. Boice JD; Leggett RW; Ellis ED; Wallace PW; Mumma M; Cohen SS; Brill AB; Chadda B; Boecker BB; Yoder RC; Eckerman KF Health Phys; 2006 May; 90(5):409-30. PubMed ID: 16607174 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A practical guideline for the release of patients treated by I-131 based on Monte Carlo dose calculations for family members. Han EY; Lee C; Mcguire L; Bolch WE J Radiol Prot; 2014 Jun; 34(2):N7-17. PubMed ID: 24705486 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of internal contamination levels after a radiological dispersal device incident using portal monitors. Palmer RC; Hertel NE; Ansari A; Manger RP; Freibert EJ Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2012 Aug; 151(2):237-51. PubMed ID: 22332142 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Averaged particle dose conversion coefficients in air crew dosimetry. Mares V; Roesler S; Schraube H Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2004; 110(1-4):371-6. PubMed ID: 15353676 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Organ and effective dose conversion coefficients for a sitting female hybrid computational phantom exposed to monoenergetic protons in idealized irradiation geometries. Alves MC; Santos WS; Lee C; Bolch WE; Hunt JG; Carvalho Júnior AB Phys Med Biol; 2014 Dec; 59(24):7957-8003. PubMed ID: 25427139 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A computational tool based on voxel geometry for dose reconstruction of a radiological accident due to external exposure. Lemosquet A; Clairand I; de Carlan L; Franck D; Aubineau-Lanièce I; Bottollier-Depois JF Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2004; 110(1-4):449-54. PubMed ID: 15353689 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Dose assessment for reentry or reoccupancy and recovery of urban areas contaminated by a radiological dispersal device: the need for a consensus approach. Sullivan T; Musolino SV; DeFranco J Health Phys; 2008 May; 94(5):411-7. PubMed ID: 18403962 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Fluence to effective dose conversion coefficients calculated for monoenergetic electrons up to 200 MeV in partial exposure geometries. Kitaichi M; Katagiri M; Hikoji M; Iwai S; Sumiyoshi T; Sawamura S Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2004; 112(3):345-58. PubMed ID: 15494361 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Radiation exposure of children in pediatric radiology. Part 3: Conversion coefficients for reconstruction of organ doses achieved during chest X-ray examinations]. Seidenbusch MC; Regulla D; Schneider K Rofo; 2008 Dec; 180(12):1061-81. PubMed ID: 19235700 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Operational Testing of a Combined Hardware-Software Strategy for Triage of Radiologically-Contaminated Persons. Waller EJ Health Phys; 2015 Aug; 109(2 Suppl 2):S176-85. PubMed ID: 26102327 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Hospital management of mass radiological casualties: reassessing exposures from contaminated victims of an exploded radiological dispersal device. Smith JM; Ansari A; Harper FT Health Phys; 2005 Nov; 89(5):513-20. PubMed ID: 16217195 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Personal dose equivalent conversion coefficients for electrons to 1 Ge V. Veinot KG; Hertel NE Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2012 Apr; 149(3):347-52. PubMed ID: 21715410 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Numerical system utilising a Monte Carlo calculation method for accurate dose assessment in radiation accidents. Takahashi F; Endo A Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2007; 126(1-4):595-9. PubMed ID: 17510203 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Neutron fluence-to-dose conversion coefficients for embryo and fetus. Chen J; Meyerhof D; Vlahovich S Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2004; 110(1-4):693-8. PubMed ID: 15353732 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of the effective dose rate to aircrew members using hybrid computational phantoms in standing and sitting postures. Alves MC; Galeano DC; Santos WS; Lee C; Bolch WE; Hunt JG; da Silva AX; Carvalho AB J Radiol Prot; 2016 Dec; 36(4):885-901. PubMed ID: 27798410 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. TEDE per cumulated activity for family members exposed to adult patients treated with 131I. Han EY; Lee C; Bolch WE Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2013; 153(4):448-56. PubMed ID: 22821723 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Dose Comparisons for a Site-specific Representative Person Using the Age-dependent Dose Coefficients in CAP88-PC Version 4. Stagich BH; Moore KR; Newton JR; Dixon KL; Jannik GT Health Phys; 2017 Apr; 112(4):338-342. PubMed ID: 28234692 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]