These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25502342)

  • 21. Influence of the size of the microgap on crestal bone changes around titanium implants. A histometric evaluation of unloaded non-submerged implants in the canine mandible.
    Hermann JS; Schoolfield JD; Schenk RK; Buser D; Cochran DL
    J Periodontol; 2001 Oct; 72(10):1372-83. PubMed ID: 11699479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Influence of the size of the microgap on crestal bone levels in non-submerged dental implants: a radiographic study in the canine mandible.
    King GN; Hermann JS; Schoolfield JD; Buser D; Cochran DL
    J Periodontol; 2002 Oct; 73(10):1111-7. PubMed ID: 12416767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The effect of bone condensation and crestal preparation on the bone response to implants designed for immediate loading: a histomorphometric study in dogs.
    de Oliveira RR; Novaes AB; Taba M; de Souza SL; Papalexiou V
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(1):63-71. PubMed ID: 17340898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Histological, radiological and histomorphometric evaluation of immediate vs. non-immediate loading of a zirconia implant with surface treatment in a dog model.
    Calvo-Guirado JL; Aguilar-Salvatierra A; Gomez-Moreno G; Guardia J; Delgado-Ruiz RA; Mate-Sanchez de Val JE
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 Jul; 25(7):826-30. PubMed ID: 23551427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Biological width formation to immediate implants placed at different level in relation to the crestal bone: an experimental study in dogs.
    Negri B; López Marí M; Maté Sánchez de Val JE; Iezzi G; Bravo González LA; Calvo Guirado JL
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2015 Jul; 26(7):788-98. PubMed ID: 24502701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The influence of non-matching implant and abutment diameters on radiographic crestal bone levels in dogs.
    Jung RE; Jones AA; Higginbottom FL; Wilson TG; Schoolfield J; Buser D; Hämmerle CH; Cochran DL
    J Periodontol; 2008 Feb; 79(2):260-70. PubMed ID: 18251640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The impact of subcrestal placement on short locking-taper implants placed in posterior maxilla and mandible: a retrospective evaluation on hard and soft tissues stability after 2 years of loading.
    Lombardo G; Corrocher G; Pighi J; Faccioni F; Rovera A; Marincola M; Nocini PF
    Minerva Stomatol; 2014; 63(11-12):391-402. PubMed ID: 25503340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Equicrestal and subcrestal dental implants: a histologic and histomorphometric evaluation of nine retrieved human implants.
    Degidi M; Perrotti V; Shibli JA; Novaes AB; Piattelli A; Iezzi G
    J Periodontol; 2011 May; 82(5):708-15. PubMed ID: 21138355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Sub-crestal positioning of implants results in higher bony crest resorption: an experimental study in dogs.
    Cesaretti G; Lang NP; Salata LA; Schweikert MT; Gutierrez Hernandez ME; Botticelli D
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2015 Dec; 26(12):1355-60. PubMed ID: 25123414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A Prospective Multicenter Study on Radiographic Crestal Bone Changes Around Dental Implants Placed at Crestal or Subcrestal Level: One-Year Findings.
    Gatti C; Gatti F; Silvestri M; Mintrone F; Rossi R; Tridondani G; Piacentini G; Borrelli P
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2018; 33(4):913-918. PubMed ID: 30025009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Bone morphology changes around two types of bone-level implants installed in fresh extraction sockets--a histomorphometric study in Beagle dogs.
    Alharbi HM; Babay N; Alzoman H; Basudan S; Anil S; Jansen JA
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2015 Sep; 26(9):1106-12. PubMed ID: 24690000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Effect of implant placement depth on the peri-implant bone defect configurations in ligature-induced peri-implantitis: An experimental study in dogs.
    Huang B; Zhang L; Xu L; Zhu W; Witek L; Tovar N; Coelho PG; Meng H
    Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal; 2018 Jan; 23(1):e30-e37. PubMed ID: 29274159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Retrospective evaluation of crestal bone changes around implants with reduced abutment diameter placed non-submerged and at subcrestal positions: the effect of bone grafting at implant placement.
    Koutouzis T; Fetner M; Fetner A; Lundgren T
    J Periodontol; 2011 Feb; 82(2):234-42. PubMed ID: 20731584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Study of an experimental microthreaded scalloped implant design: proximal bone healing at different interimplant distances in a canine model.
    Choi KS; Lozada JL; Kan JY; Lee SH; Kim CS; Kwon TG
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(4):681-9. PubMed ID: 20657862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Soft tissue and crestal bone changes around implants with platform-switched abutments placed nonsubmerged at subcrestal position: a 2-year clinical and radiographic evaluation.
    Aimetti M; Ferrarotti F; Mariani GM; Ghelardoni C; Romano F
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2015; 30(6):1369-77. PubMed ID: 26478966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Effects of Surface Treatment Modification and Implant Design in Implants Placed Crestal and Subcrestally Applying Delayed Loading Protocol.
    Val JE; Gómez-Moreno G; Ruiz-Linares M; Prados-Frutos JC; Gehrke SA; Calvo-Guirado JL
    J Craniofac Surg; 2017 Mar; 28(2):552-558. PubMed ID: 27984434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Single-staged implant placement using bone ring technique with and without membrane placement: An experimental study in the Beagle dog.
    Haga-Tsujimura M; Nakahara K; Kobayashi E; Igarashi K; Schaller B; Saulacic N
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2018 Mar; 29(3):263-276. PubMed ID: 29235158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Hard and soft tissue changes around implants installed in regular-sized and reduced alveolar bony ridges. An experimental study in dogs.
    Baffone G; Lang NP; Pantani F; Favero G; Ferri M; Botticelli D
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2015; 26(1):96-101. PubMed ID: 24299114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Impact of crestal and subcrestal implant placement in peri-implant bone: A prospective comparative study.
    Pellicer-Chover H; Peñarrocha-Diago M; Peñarrocha-Oltra D; Gomar-Vercher S; Agustín-Panadero R; Peñarrocha-Diago M
    Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal; 2016 Jan; 21(1):e103-10. PubMed ID: 26615504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Influence of placement depth on bone remodeling around tapered internal connection implants: a histologic study in dogs.
    Huang B; Meng H; Zhu W; Witek L; Tovar N; Coelho PG
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2015 Aug; 26(8):942-949. PubMed ID: 24720447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.