These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25502599)

  • 1. Characterization of the startup transient electrokinetic flow in rectangular channels of arbitrary dimensions, zeta potential distribution, and time-varying pressure gradient.
    Miller A; Villegas A; Diez FJ
    Electrophoresis; 2015 Mar; 36(5):692-702. PubMed ID: 25502599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. In situ particle zeta potential evaluation in electroosmotic flows from time-resolved microPIV measurements.
    Sureda M; Miller A; Diez FJ
    Electrophoresis; 2012 Sep; 33(17):2759-68. PubMed ID: 22965723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Unsteady electroosmosis in a microchannel with Poisson-Boltzmann charge distribution.
    Chang CC; Kuo CY; Wang CY
    Electrophoresis; 2011 Nov; 32(23):3341-7. PubMed ID: 22072500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A simple method to determine the surface charge in microfluidic channels.
    Mampallil D; van den Ende D; Mugele F
    Electrophoresis; 2010 Jan; 31(3):563-9. PubMed ID: 20119966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A method for simultaneously determining the zeta potentials of the channel surface and the tracer particles using microparticle image velocimetry technique.
    Yan D; Yang C; Nguyen NT; Huang X
    Electrophoresis; 2006 Feb; 27(3):620-7. PubMed ID: 16456891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Influence of varying electroosmotic flow on the effective diffusion in electric field gradient separations.
    Maynes D; Tenny J; Webbd BW; Lee ML
    Electrophoresis; 2008 Feb; 29(3):549-60. PubMed ID: 18200632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Quantification of electrical field-induced flow reversal in a microchannel.
    Pirat C; Naso A; van der Wouden EJ; Gardeniers JG; Lohse D; van den Berg A
    Lab Chip; 2008 Jun; 8(6):945-9. PubMed ID: 18497916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Measuring microchannel electroosmotic mobility and zeta potential by the current monitoring method.
    Shao C; Devoe DL
    Methods Mol Biol; 2013; 949():55-63. PubMed ID: 23329435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Enhancement of electrokinetically driven microfluidic T-mixer using frequency modulated electric field and channel geometry effects.
    Yan D; Yang C; Miao J; Lam Y; Huang X
    Electrophoresis; 2009 Sep; 30(18):3144-52. PubMed ID: 19764063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. In vitro blood flow in a rectangular PDMS microchannel: experimental observations using a confocal micro-PIV system.
    Lima R; Wada S; Tanaka S; Takeda M; Ishikawa T; Tsubota K; Imai Y; Yamaguchi T
    Biomed Microdevices; 2008 Apr; 10(2):153-67. PubMed ID: 17885805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Estimation of inhomogeneous zeta potential using velocity measurements of EOF.
    Park HM; Lee JS
    Electrophoresis; 2007 May; 28(10):1499-507. PubMed ID: 17447245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Analytical investigations on the effects of substrate kinetics on macromolecular transport and hybridization through microfluidic channels.
    Das S; Subramanian K; Chakraborty S
    Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces; 2007 Aug; 58(2):203-17. PubMed ID: 17481862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Determination of the Navier slip coefficient of microchannels exploiting the streaming potential.
    Park HM
    Electrophoresis; 2012 Mar; 33(6):906-15. PubMed ID: 22528410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Influence of streaming potential on pulsatile pressure-gradient driven flow through an annulus.
    Shenoy A; Chakraborty J; Chakraborty S
    Electrophoresis; 2013 Mar; 34(5):691-9. PubMed ID: 23192458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Ultrafast electrokinetics.
    Rouhi Youssefi M; Diez FJ
    Electrophoresis; 2016 Mar; 37(5-6):692-8. PubMed ID: 26840989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Recursive estimation of transient inhomogeneous zeta potential in microchannel turns using velocity measurements.
    Park HM; Kim TW
    Biomed Microdevices; 2009 Feb; 11(1):231-41. PubMed ID: 18807196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Characterization of electroosmotic flow through nanoporous self-assembled arrays.
    Bell K; Gomes M; Nazemifard N
    Electrophoresis; 2015 Aug; 36(15):1738-43. PubMed ID: 25964193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The deformation of flexible PDMS microchannels under a pressure driven flow.
    Hardy BS; Uechi K; Zhen J; Pirouz Kavehpour H
    Lab Chip; 2009 Apr; 9(7):935-8. PubMed ID: 19294304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Electrokinetic-vortex formation near a two-part cylinder with same-sign zeta potentials in a straight microchannel.
    Wang C; Song Y; Pan X
    Electrophoresis; 2020 Jun; 41(10-11):793-801. PubMed ID: 32012307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Optimisation of a microfluidic analysis chamber for the placement of microelectrodes.
    Rogers M; Leong C; Niu X; de Mello A; Parker KH; Boutelle MG
    Phys Chem Chem Phys; 2011 Mar; 13(12):5298-303. PubMed ID: 21344092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.