These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

331 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25502616)

  • 1. Comparing velocity and fluid shear stress in a stenotic phantom with steady flow: phase-contrast MRI, particle image velocimetry and computational fluid dynamics.
    Khodarahmi I
    MAGMA; 2015 Aug; 28(4):385-93. PubMed ID: 25502616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. In vitro validation of flow measurement with phase contrast MRI at 3 tesla using stereoscopic particle image velocimetry and stereoscopic particle image velocimetry-based computational fluid dynamics.
    Khodarahmi I; Shakeri M; Kotys-Traughber M; Fischer S; Sharp MK; Amini AA
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2014 Jun; 39(6):1477-85. PubMed ID: 24123721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Complex flow patterns in a real-size intracranial aneurysm phantom: phase contrast MRI compared with particle image velocimetry and computational fluid dynamics.
    van Ooij P; Guédon A; Poelma C; Schneiders J; Rutten MC; Marquering HA; Majoie CB; VanBavel E; Nederveen AJ
    NMR Biomed; 2012 Jan; 25(1):14-26. PubMed ID: 21480417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Wall shear stress estimated with phase contrast MRI in an in vitro and in vivo intracranial aneurysm.
    van Ooij P; Potters WV; Guédon A; Schneiders JJ; Marquering HA; Majoie CB; vanBavel E; Nederveen AJ
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2013 Oct; 38(4):876-84. PubMed ID: 23417769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Using PIV to determine relative pressures in a stenotic phantom under steady flow based on the pressure-poisson equation.
    Khodarahmi I; Shakeri M; Sharp M; Amini AA
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2010; 2010():2594-7. PubMed ID: 21096448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Experimental and numerical investigation of pulsed flows in asevere aortic stenosed model.
    Trigui A; Chiekh MB; Béra JC; Gilles B
    Med Eng Phys; 2021 Apr; 90():33-42. PubMed ID: 33781478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Time-Resolved Particle Image Velocimetry Measurements with Wall Shear Stress and Uncertainty Quantification for the FDA Nozzle Model.
    Raben JS; Hariharan P; Robinson R; Malinauskas R; Vlachos PP
    Cardiovasc Eng Technol; 2016 Mar; 7(1):7-22. PubMed ID: 26628081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of intracranial aneurysm flow quantification techniques: standard PIV vs stereoscopic PIV vs tomographic PIV vs phase-contrast MRI vs CFD.
    Roloff C; Stucht D; Beuing O; Berg P
    J Neurointerv Surg; 2019 Mar; 11(3):275-282. PubMed ID: 30061369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. In vitro and preliminary in vivo validation of echo particle image velocimetry in carotid vascular imaging.
    Zhang F; Lanning C; Mazzaro L; Barker AJ; Gates PE; Strain WD; Fulford J; Gosling OE; Shore AC; Bellenger NG; Rech B; Chen J; Chen J; Shandas R
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2011 Mar; 37(3):450-64. PubMed ID: 21316562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Shear-scaling-based approach for irreversible energy loss estimation in stenotic aortic flow - An in vitro study.
    Gülan U; Binter C; Kozerke S; Holzner M
    J Biomech; 2017 May; 56():89-96. PubMed ID: 28342532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Inter-Laboratory Characterization of the Velocity Field in the FDA Blood Pump Model Using Particle Image Velocimetry (PIV).
    Hariharan P; Aycock KI; Buesen M; Day SW; Good BC; Herbertson LH; Steinseifer U; Manning KB; Craven BA; Malinauskas RA
    Cardiovasc Eng Technol; 2018 Dec; 9(4):623-640. PubMed ID: 30291585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Computational fluid dynamics simulations of blood flow regularized by 3D phase contrast MRI.
    Rispoli VC; Nielsen JF; Nayak KS; Carvalho JL
    Biomed Eng Online; 2015 Nov; 14():110. PubMed ID: 26611470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Computational Fluid Dynamics Modeling of the Human Pulmonary Arteries with Experimental Validation.
    Bordones AD; Leroux M; Kheyfets VO; Wu YA; Chen CY; Finol EA
    Ann Biomed Eng; 2018 Sep; 46(9):1309-1324. PubMed ID: 29786774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Hemodynamic Study of a Patient-Specific Intracranial Aneurysm: Comparative Assessment of Tomographic PIV, Stereoscopic PIV, In Vivo MRI and Computational Fluid Dynamics.
    Wu X; Gürzing S; Schinkel C; Toussaint M; Perinajová R; van Ooij P; Kenjereš S
    Cardiovasc Eng Technol; 2022 Jun; 13(3):428-442. PubMed ID: 34750782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging measurements in intracranial aneurysms in vivo of flow patterns, velocity fields, and wall shear stress: comparison with computational fluid dynamics.
    Boussel L; Rayz V; Martin A; Acevedo-Bolton G; Lawton MT; Higashida R; Smith WS; Young WL; Saloner D
    Magn Reson Med; 2009 Feb; 61(2):409-17. PubMed ID: 19161132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Echo Particle Image Velocimetry for Estimation of Carotid Artery Wall Shear Stress: Repeatability, Reproducibility and Comparison with Phase-Contrast Magnetic Resonance Imaging.
    Gurung A; Gates PE; Mazzaro L; Fulford J; Zhang F; Barker AJ; Hertzberg J; Aizawa K; Strain WD; Elyas S; Shore AC; Shandas R
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2017 Aug; 43(8):1618-1627. PubMed ID: 28501327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Multilaboratory particle image velocimetry analysis of the FDA benchmark nozzle model to support validation of computational fluid dynamics simulations.
    Hariharan P; Giarra M; Reddy V; Day SW; Manning KB; Deutsch S; Stewart SF; Myers MR; Berman MR; Burgreen GW; Paterson EG; Malinauskas RA
    J Biomech Eng; 2011 Apr; 133(4):041002. PubMed ID: 21428676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Haemodynamics in a patient-specific intracranial aneurysm according to experimental and numerical approaches: A comparison of PIV, CFD and PC-MRI.
    Li Y; Yoneyama Y; Isoda H; Terada M; Kosugi T; Kosugi T; Zhang M; Ohta M
    Technol Health Care; 2021; 29(2):253-267. PubMed ID: 32568138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Analysis of Computational Fluid Dynamics and Particle Image Velocimetry Models of Distal-End Side-to-Side and End-to-Side Anastomoses for Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting in a Pulsatile Flow.
    Shintani Y; Iino K; Yamamoto Y; Kato H; Takemura H; Kiwata T
    Circ J; 2017 Dec; 82(1):110-117. PubMed ID: 28824030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Dynamically scaled phantom phase contrast MRI compared to true-scale computational modeling of coronary artery flow.
    Beier S; Ormiston JA; Webster MW; Cater JE; Norris SE; Medrano-Gracia P; Young AA; Cowan BR
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2016 Oct; 44(4):983-92. PubMed ID: 27042817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.