These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
329 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25502616)
21. Human upper-airway respiratory airflow: In vivo comparison of computational fluid dynamics simulations and hyperpolarized 129Xe phase contrast MRI velocimetry. Xiao Q; Stewart NJ; Willmering MM; Gunatilaka CC; Thomen RP; Schuh A; Krishnamoorthy G; Wang H; Amin RS; Dumoulin CL; Woods JC; Bates AJ PLoS One; 2021; 16(8):e0256460. PubMed ID: 34411195 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Post-stenotic plug-like jet with a vortex ring demonstrated by 4D flow MRI. Kim GB; Ha H; Kweon J; Lee SJ; Kim YH; Yang DH; Kim N Magn Reson Imaging; 2016 May; 34(4):371-5. PubMed ID: 26657978 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Mapping mean and fluctuating velocities by Bayesian multipoint MR velocity encoding-validation against 3D particle tracking velocimetry. Knobloch V; Binter C; Gülan U; Sigfridsson A; Holzner M; Lüthi B; Kozerke S Magn Reson Med; 2014 Apr; 71(4):1405-15. PubMed ID: 23670993 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Comparative velocity investigations in cerebral arteries and aneurysms: 3D phase-contrast MR angiography, laser Doppler velocimetry and computational fluid dynamics. Hollnagel DI; Summers PE; Poulikakos D; Kollias SS NMR Biomed; 2009 Oct; 22(8):795-808. PubMed ID: 19412933 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Combined MRI and CFD analysis of fully developed steady and pulsatile laminar flow through a bend. Weston SJ; Wood NB; Tabor G; Gosman AD; Firmin DN J Magn Reson Imaging; 1998; 8(5):1158-71. PubMed ID: 9786156 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Development of a System for Measuring Wall Shear Stress in Blood Vessels using Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Computational Fluid Dynamics. Yoshida K; Nagao T; Okada K; Miyazaki S; Yang X; Yamazaki Y; Murase K Igaku Butsuri; 2008; 27(3):136-49. PubMed ID: 18367824 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Factors affecting the accuracy of pressure measurements in vascular stenoses from phase-contrast MRI. Nasiraei-Moghaddam A; Behrens G; Fatouraee N; Agarwal R; Choi ET; Amini AA Magn Reson Med; 2004 Aug; 52(2):300-9. PubMed ID: 15282812 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Computational fluid dynamics with stents: quantitative comparison with particle image velocimetry for three commercial off the shelf intracranial stents. Bouillot P; Brina O; Ouared R; Yilmaz H; Lovblad KO; Farhat M; Mendes Pereira V J Neurointerv Surg; 2016 Mar; 8(3):309-15. PubMed ID: 25603807 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. On the suitability of steady RANS CFD for forced mixing ventilation at transitional slot Reynolds numbers. van Hooff T; Blocken B; van Heijst GJ Indoor Air; 2013 Jun; 23(3):236-49. PubMed ID: 23094648 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Four-dimensional flow MRI for evaluation of post-stenotic turbulent flow in a phantom: comparison with flowmeter and computational fluid dynamics. Kweon J; Yang DH; Kim GB; Kim N; Paek M; Stalder AF; Greiser A; Kim YH Eur Radiol; 2016 Oct; 26(10):3588-97. PubMed ID: 26747263 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Independent validation of four-dimensional flow MR velocities and vortex ring volume using particle imaging velocimetry and planar laser-Induced fluorescence. Töger J; Bidhult S; Revstedt J; Carlsson M; Arheden H; Heiberg E Magn Reson Med; 2016 Mar; 75(3):1064-75. PubMed ID: 25940239 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Computational and experimental assessment of influences of hemodynamic shear stress on carotid plaque. Zhou H; Meng L; Zhou W; Xin L; Xia X; Li S; Zheng H; Niu L Biomed Eng Online; 2017 Jul; 16(1):92. PubMed ID: 28755660 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Comparison of 4D Flow MRI and Particle Image Velocimetry Using an In Vitro Carotid Bifurcation Model. Medero R; Hoffman C; Roldán-Alzate A Ann Biomed Eng; 2018 Dec; 46(12):2112-2122. PubMed ID: 30112708 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Comparative study of magnetic resonance imaging and image-based computational fluid dynamics for quantification of pulsatile flow in a carotid bifurcation phantom. Zhao SZ; Papathanasopoulou P; Long Q; Marshall I; Xu XY Ann Biomed Eng; 2003 Sep; 31(8):962-71. PubMed ID: 12918911 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Accelerated sequences of 4D flow MRI using GRAPPA and compressed sensing: A comparison against conventional MRI and computational fluid dynamics. Garreau M; Puiseux T; Toupin S; Giese D; Mendez S; Nicoud F; Moreno R Magn Reson Med; 2022 Dec; 88(6):2432-2446. PubMed ID: 36005271 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Numerical simulations of flow in cerebral aneurysms: comparison of CFD results and in vivo MRI measurements. Rayz VL; Boussel L; Acevedo-Bolton G; Martin AJ; Young WL; Lawton MT; Higashida R; Saloner D J Biomech Eng; 2008 Oct; 130(5):051011. PubMed ID: 19045518 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. MRI and CFD studies of pulsatile flow in healthy and stenosed carotid bifurcation models. Marshall I; Zhao S; Papathanasopoulou P; Hoskins P; Xu Y J Biomech; 2004 May; 37(5):679-87. PubMed ID: 15046997 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Experimental Validation of Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging (EMRI) Using Particle Image Velocimetry (PIV). Annio G; Torii R; Ducci A; Muthurangu V; Tsang V; Burriesci G Ann Biomed Eng; 2021 Dec; 49(12):3481-3493. PubMed ID: 34181130 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. A phantom study comparing radial trajectories for accelerated cardiac 4D flow MRI against a particle imaging velocimetry reference. Corrado PA; Medero R; Johnson KM; François CJ; Roldán-Alzate A; Wieben O Magn Reson Med; 2021 Jul; 86(1):363-371. PubMed ID: 33547658 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Use of computational fluid dynamics in the design of dynamic contrast enhanced imaging phantoms. Hariharan P; Freed M; Myers MR Phys Med Biol; 2013 Sep; 58(18):6369-91. PubMed ID: 23999605 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]