These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

246 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25503499)

  • 1. Researchers' views on informed consent for return of secondary results in genomic research.
    Appelbaum PS; Fyer A; Klitzman RL; Martinez J; Parens E; Zhang Y; Chung WK
    Genet Med; 2015 Aug; 17(8):644-50. PubMed ID: 25503499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Informed consent for return of incidental findings in genomic research.
    Appelbaum PS; Waldman CR; Fyer A; Klitzman R; Parens E; Martinez J; Price WN; Chung WK
    Genet Med; 2014 May; 16(5):367-73. PubMed ID: 24158054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Attitudes of nearly 7000 health professionals, genomic researchers and publics toward the return of incidental results from sequencing research.
    Middleton A; Morley KI; Bragin E; Firth HV; Hurles ME; Wright CF; Parker M;
    Eur J Hum Genet; 2016 Jan; 24(1):21-9. PubMed ID: 25920556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Researchers' views on, and experiences with, the requirement to obtain informed consent in research involving human participants: a qualitative study.
    Xu A; Baysari MT; Stocker SL; Leow LJ; Day RO; Carland JE
    BMC Med Ethics; 2020 Oct; 21(1):93. PubMed ID: 33008387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Views of US researchers about informed consent in international collaborative research.
    Dawson L; Kass NE
    Soc Sci Med; 2005 Sep; 61(6):1211-22. PubMed ID: 15970232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Use and disclosure of genetic information without consent: a decision-making tool for health practitioners--who, when, why and how?
    National Health and Medical Research Council
    Intern Med J; 2011 Aug; 41(8):634-8. PubMed ID: 21615658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Genomic information and a person's right not to know: A closer look at variations in hypothetical informational preferences in a German sample.
    Flatau L; Reitt M; Duttge G; Lenk C; Zoll B; Poser W; Weber A; Heilbronner U; Rietschel M; Strohmaier J; Kesberg R; Nagel J; Schulze TG
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(6):e0198249. PubMed ID: 29924808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Survey of Attitudes of Japanese Women Toward Genetic/Genomic Research.
    Moriya H; Inoue I; Ikeuchi M; Ishii N; Motojima M
    J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2014 Jul; 9(3):29-38. PubMed ID: 26251854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Researchers' preferences and attitudes on ethical aspects of genomics research: a comparative study between the USA and Spain.
    Ruiz-Canela M; Valle-Mansilla JI; Sulmasy DP
    J Med Ethics; 2009 Apr; 35(4):251-7. PubMed ID: 19332583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Fair Shares and Sharing Fairly: A Survey of Public Views on Open Science, Informed Consent and Participatory Research in Biobanking.
    Joly Y; Dalpé G; So D; Birko S
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(7):e0129893. PubMed ID: 26154134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Informed consent and collaborative research: perspectives from the developing world.
    Hyder AA; Wali SA
    Dev World Bioeth; 2006 Mar; 6(1):33-40. PubMed ID: 16436172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Should Researchers Offer Results to Family Members of Cancer Biobank Participants? A Mixed-Methods Study of Proband and Family Preferences.
    Gordon DR; Radecki Breitkopf C; Robinson M; Petersen WO; Egginton JS; Chaffee KG; Petersen GM; Wolf SM; Koenig BA
    AJOB Empir Bioeth; 2019; 10(1):1-22. PubMed ID: 30596322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Native Hawaiian preferences for informed consent and disclosure of results from research using stored biological specimens.
    Fong M; Braun KL; Chang RM
    Pac Health Dialog; 2004 Sep; 11(2):154-9. PubMed ID: 16281693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Improving informed consent: Stakeholder views.
    Anderson EE; Newman SB; Matthews AK
    AJOB Empir Bioeth; 2017; 8(3):178-188. PubMed ID: 28949896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Patient Preferences for Use of Archived Biospecimens from Oncology Trials When Adequacy of Informed Consent Is Unclear.
    Peppercorn J; Campbell E; Isakoff S; Horick NK; Rabin J; Quain K; Sequist LV; Bardia A; Collyar D; Hlubocky F; Mathews D
    Oncologist; 2020 Jan; 25(1):78-86. PubMed ID: 31492767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Information giving in clinical trials: the views of medical researchers.
    Ferguson PR
    Bioethics; 2003 Feb; 17(1):101-11. PubMed ID: 12722736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Research, informed consent, and the limits of disclosure.
    Wilkinson TM
    Bioethics; 2001 Aug; 15(4):341-63. PubMed ID: 11721682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Attitudes toward genetic research review: results from a survey of human genetics researchers.
    Edwards KL; Lemke AA; Trinidad SB; Lewis SM; Starks H; Quinn Griffin MT; Wiesner GL
    Public Health Genomics; 2011; 14(6):337-45. PubMed ID: 21487211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluating the consent preferences of UK research volunteers for genetic and clinical studies.
    Kelly SE; Spector TD; Cherkas LF; Prainsack B; Harris JM
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(3):e0118027. PubMed ID: 25761107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Stakeholders' perspectives on the post-mortem use of genetic and health-related data for research: a systematic review.
    Bak MAR; Ploem MC; Ateşyürek H; Blom MT; Tan HL; Willems DL
    Eur J Hum Genet; 2020 Apr; 28(4):403-416. PubMed ID: 31527854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.