These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

318 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25504401)

  • 1. Getting started in research: systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
    Kisely S; Chang A; Crowe J; Galletly C; Jenkins P; Loi S; Looi JC; Macfarlane MD; McVie N; Parker S; Power B; Siskind D; Smith G; Merry S; Macfarlane S
    Australas Psychiatry; 2015 Feb; 23(1):16-21. PubMed ID: 25504401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 6. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies.
    Manchikanti L; Datta S; Smith HS; Hirsch JA
    Pain Physician; 2009; 12(5):819-50. PubMed ID: 19787009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Systematic reviews and meta-analysis: scientific rationale and interpretation.
    Ferreira González I; Urrútia G; Alonso-Coello P
    Rev Esp Cardiol; 2011 Aug; 64(8):688-96. PubMed ID: 21719182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Deconstructing evidence in orthodontics: making sense of systematic reviews, randomized clinical trials, and meta-analyses.
    Rinchuse DJ; Rinchuse DJ; Kandasamy S; Ackerman MB
    World J Orthod; 2008; 9(2):167-76. PubMed ID: 18575311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Getting to grips with systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
    Davies HT; Crombie IK
    Hosp Med; 1998 Dec; 59(12):955-8. PubMed ID: 10696361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Getting started in research: research questions, supervisors and literature reviews.
    Macfarlane MD; Kisely S; Loi S; Looi JC; Merry S; Parker S; Power B; Siskind D; Smith G; Macfarlane S
    Australas Psychiatry; 2015 Feb; 23(1):8-11. PubMed ID: 25313291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Conducting systematic reviews of intervention questions III: Synthesizing data from intervention studies using meta-analysis.
    O'Connor AM; Sargeant JM; Wang C
    Zoonoses Public Health; 2014 Jun; 61 Suppl 1():52-63. PubMed ID: 24905996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Fixed or random effects meta-analysis? Common methodological issues in systematic reviews of effectiveness.
    Tufanaru C; Munn Z; Stephenson M; Aromataris E
    Int J Evid Based Healthc; 2015 Sep; 13(3):196-207. PubMed ID: 26355603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluating single-case research data for systematic review: a commentary for the special issue.
    Maggin DM; Odom SL
    J Sch Psychol; 2014 Apr; 52(2):237-41. PubMed ID: 24606978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Overview of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of acupuncture for stroke.
    Zhang JH; Wang D; Liu M
    Neuroepidemiology; 2014; 42(1):50-8. PubMed ID: 24356063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Evaluation of methodological quality of systematic reviews and meta-analyses: AMSTAR (A Measurement Tool for the Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews)].
    Coenen M; Schuetz GM; Dewey M
    Rofo; 2013 Sep; 184(10):937-40. PubMed ID: 23999778
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses: an illustrated, step-by-step guide.
    Pai M; McCulloch M; Gorman JD; Pai N; Enanoria W; Kennedy G; Tharyan P; Colford JM
    Natl Med J India; 2004; 17(2):86-95. PubMed ID: 15141602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Systematic reviews and their application to research in speech and language therapy: a response to T. R. Pring's 'Ask a silly question: two decades of troublesome trials' (2004).
    Garrett Z; Thomas J
    Int J Lang Commun Disord; 2006; 41(1):95-105. PubMed ID: 16272005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of reporting bias on meta-analyses of drug trials: reanalysis of meta-analyses.
    Hart B; Lundh A; Bero L
    BMJ; 2012 Jan; 344():d7202. PubMed ID: 22214754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The quality of reports of critical care meta-analyses in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews: an independent appraisal.
    Delaney A; Bagshaw SM; Ferland A; Laupland K; Manns B; Doig C
    Crit Care Med; 2007 Feb; 35(2):589-94. PubMed ID: 17205029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evidence-based practice: how to perform and use systematic reviews for clinical decision-making.
    Kranke P
    Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2010 Sep; 27(9):763-72. PubMed ID: 20523217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A methodological review of recent meta-analyses has found significant heterogeneity in age between randomized groups.
    Clark L; Fairhurst C; Hewitt CE; Birks Y; Brabyn S; Cockayne S; Rodgers S; Hicks K; Hodgson R; Littlewood E; Torgerson DJ
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2014 Sep; 67(9):1016-24. PubMed ID: 24909873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Methodologic issues in systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
    Montori VM; Swiontkowski MF; Cook DJ
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2003 Aug; (413):43-54. PubMed ID: 12897595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evidence-based decision-making 2: Systematic reviews and meta-analysis.
    Bello A; Wiebe N; Garg A; Tonelli M
    Methods Mol Biol; 2015; 1281():397-416. PubMed ID: 25694324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Errors in the conduct of systematic reviews of pharmacological interventions for irritable bowel syndrome.
    Ford AC; Guyatt GH; Talley NJ; Moayyedi P
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2010 Feb; 105(2):280-8. PubMed ID: 19920807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.