BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25504513)

  • 1. Effects of categorization method, regression type, and variable distribution on the inflation of Type-I error rate when categorizing a confounding variable.
    Barnwell-Ménard JL; Li Q; Cohen AA
    Stat Med; 2015 Mar; 34(6):936-49. PubMed ID: 25504513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Inflation of the type I error rate when a continuous confounding variable is categorized in logistic regression analyses.
    Austin PC; Brunner LJ
    Stat Med; 2004 Apr; 23(7):1159-78. PubMed ID: 15057884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Using generalized additive models to reduce residual confounding.
    Benedetti A; Abrahamowicz M
    Stat Med; 2004 Dec; 23(24):3781-801. PubMed ID: 15580601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Bias Formulas for Estimating Direct and Indirect Effects When Unmeasured Confounding Is Present.
    le Cessie S
    Epidemiology; 2016 Jan; 27(1):125-32. PubMed ID: 26426943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Regularized Regression Versus the High-Dimensional Propensity Score for Confounding Adjustment in Secondary Database Analyses.
    Franklin JM; Eddings W; Glynn RJ; Schneeweiss S
    Am J Epidemiol; 2015 Oct; 182(7):651-9. PubMed ID: 26233956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Part 1. Statistical Learning Methods for the Effects of Multiple Air Pollution Constituents.
    Coull BA; Bobb JF; Wellenius GA; Kioumourtzoglou MA; Mittleman MA; Koutrakis P; Godleski JJ
    Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2015 Jun; (183 Pt 1-2):5-50. PubMed ID: 26333238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Spurious interaction as a result of categorization.
    Thoresen M
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2019 Feb; 19(1):28. PubMed ID: 30732587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Mismeasurement and the resonance of strong confounders: uncorrelated errors.
    Marshall JR; Hastrup JL
    Am J Epidemiol; 1996 May; 143(10):1069-78. PubMed ID: 8629614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effect of sample size and bias on the reliability of estimates of error: a comparative study of Dahlberg's formula.
    Springate SD
    Eur J Orthod; 2012 Apr; 34(2):158-63. PubMed ID: 21447784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Adjusting for bias and unmeasured confounding in Mendelian randomization studies with binary responses.
    Palmer TM; Thompson JR; Tobin MD; Sheehan NA; Burton PR
    Int J Epidemiol; 2008 Oct; 37(5):1161-8. PubMed ID: 18463132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Confounder selection via penalized credible regions.
    Wilson A; Reich BJ
    Biometrics; 2014 Dec; 70(4):852-61. PubMed ID: 25123966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Biased odds ratios from dichotomization of age.
    Chen H; Cohen P; Chen S
    Stat Med; 2007 Aug; 26(18):3487-97. PubMed ID: 17066378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Identification of confounder in epidemiologic data contaminated by measurement error in covariates.
    Lee PH; Burstyn I
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2016 May; 16():54. PubMed ID: 27193095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Relaxing the rule of ten events per variable in logistic and Cox regression.
    Vittinghoff E; McCulloch CE
    Am J Epidemiol; 2007 Mar; 165(6):710-8. PubMed ID: 17182981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Two-stage instrumental variable methods for estimating the causal odds ratio: analysis of bias.
    Cai B; Small DS; Have TR
    Stat Med; 2011 Jul; 30(15):1809-24. PubMed ID: 21495062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effect of unmeasured confounders on the ability to estimate a true performance or selection gradient (and other partial regression coefficients).
    Walker JA
    Evolution; 2014 Jul; 68(7):2128-36. PubMed ID: 24635123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Varied forms of bias due to nondifferential error in measuring exposure.
    Brenner H; Loomis D
    Epidemiology; 1994 Sep; 5(5):510-7. PubMed ID: 7986865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The sign of the unmeasured confounding bias under various standard populations.
    Chiba Y
    Biom J; 2009 Aug; 51(4):670-6. PubMed ID: 19650054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Consequences of exposure measurement error for confounder identification in environmental epidemiology.
    Budtz-Jørgensen E; Keiding N; Grandjean P; Weihe P; White RF
    Stat Med; 2003 Oct; 22(19):3089-100. PubMed ID: 12973789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Polychotomization of continuous variables in regression models based on the overall C index.
    Tsuruta H; Bax L
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2006 Dec; 6():41. PubMed ID: 17169154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.