272 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25504728)
1. Statistical binning enables an accurate coalescent-based estimation of the avian tree.
Mirarab S; Bayzid MS; Boussau B; Warnow T
Science; 2014 Dec; 346(6215):1250463. PubMed ID: 25504728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Weighted Statistical Binning: Enabling Statistically Consistent Genome-Scale Phylogenetic Analyses.
Bayzid MS; Mirarab S; Boussau B; Warnow T
PLoS One; 2015; 10(6):e0129183. PubMed ID: 26086579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Response to Comment on "Statistical binning enables an accurate coalescent-based estimation of the avian tree".
Mirarab S; Bayzid MS; Boussau B; Warnow T
Science; 2015 Oct; 350(6257):171. PubMed ID: 26450204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. On the Robustness to Gene Tree Estimation Error (or lack thereof) of Coalescent-Based Species Tree Methods.
Roch S; Warnow T
Syst Biol; 2015 Jul; 64(4):663-76. PubMed ID: 25813358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Statistical binning leads to profound model violation due to gene tree error incurred by trying to avoid gene tree error.
Adams RH; Castoe TA
Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2019 May; 134():164-171. PubMed ID: 30790674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluating Summary Methods for Multilocus Species Tree Estimation in the Presence of Incomplete Lineage Sorting.
Mirarab S; Bayzid MS; Warnow T
Syst Biol; 2016 May; 65(3):366-80. PubMed ID: 25164915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. To Include or Not to Include: The Impact of Gene Filtering on Species Tree Estimation Methods.
Molloy EK; Warnow T
Syst Biol; 2018 Mar; 67(2):285-303. PubMed ID: 29029338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comment on "Statistical binning enables an accurate coalescent-based estimation of the avian tree".
Liu L; Edwards SV
Science; 2015 Oct; 350(6257):171. PubMed ID: 26450203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Estimating species phylogeny from gene-tree probabilities despite incomplete lineage sorting: an example from Melanoplus grasshoppers.
Carstens BC; Knowles LL
Syst Biol; 2007 Jun; 56(3):400-11. PubMed ID: 17520504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The gene tree delusion.
Springer MS; Gatesy J
Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2016 Jan; 94(Pt A):1-33. PubMed ID: 26238460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. STELAR: a statistically consistent coalescent-based species tree estimation method by maximizing triplet consistency.
Islam M; Sarker K; Das T; Reaz R; Bayzid MS
BMC Genomics; 2020 Feb; 21(1):136. PubMed ID: 32039704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Coalescent methods are robust to the simultaneous effects of long branches and incomplete lineage sorting.
Liu L; Xi Z; Davis CC
Mol Biol Evol; 2015 Mar; 32(3):791-805. PubMed ID: 25431481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Genes with minimal phylogenetic information are problematic for coalescent analyses when gene tree estimation is biased.
Xi Z; Liu L; Davis CC
Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2015 Nov; 92():63-71. PubMed ID: 26115844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A comparative study of SVDquartets and other coalescent-based species tree estimation methods.
Chou J; Gupta A; Yaduvanshi S; Davidson R; Nute M; Mirarab S; Warnow T
BMC Genomics; 2015; 16 Suppl 10(Suppl 10):S2. PubMed ID: 26449249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Sources of error inherent in species-tree estimation: impact of mutational and coalescent effects on accuracy and implications for choosing among different methods.
Huang H; He Q; Kubatko LS; Knowles LL
Syst Biol; 2010 Oct; 59(5):573-83. PubMed ID: 20833951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. ASTRAL: genome-scale coalescent-based species tree estimation.
Mirarab S; Reaz R; Bayzid MS; Zimmermann T; Swenson MS; Warnow T
Bioinformatics; 2014 Sep; 30(17):i541-8. PubMed ID: 25161245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Phylogenomic analyses data of the avian phylogenomics project.
Jarvis ED; Mirarab S; Aberer AJ; Li B; Houde P; Li C; Ho SY; Faircloth BC; Nabholz B; Howard JT; Suh A; Weber CC; da Fonseca RR; Alfaro-Núñez A; Narula N; Liu L; Burt D; Ellegren H; Edwards SV; Stamatakis A; Mindell DP; Cracraft J; Braun EL; Warnow T; Jun W; Gilbert MT; Zhang G;
Gigascience; 2015; 4():4. PubMed ID: 25741440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Coalescent-Based Analyses of Genomic Sequence Data Provide a Robust Resolution of Phylogenetic Relationships among Major Groups of Gibbons.
Shi CM; Yang Z
Mol Biol Evol; 2018 Jan; 35(1):159-179. PubMed ID: 29087487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. An analytical comparison of multilocus methods under the multispecies coalescent: the three-taxon case.
Roch S
Pac Symp Biocomput; 2013; ():297-306. PubMed ID: 23424134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Disk covering methods improve phylogenomic analyses.
Bayzid MS; Hunt T; Warnow T
BMC Genomics; 2014; 15 Suppl 6(Suppl 6):S7. PubMed ID: 25572610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
