BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

419 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25505225)

  • 1. The value of ADC, T2 signal intensity, and a combination of both parameters to assess Gleason score and primary Gleason grades in patients with known prostate cancer.
    Nowak J; Malzahn U; Baur AD; Reichelt U; Franiel T; Hamm B; Durmus T
    Acta Radiol; 2016 Jan; 57(1):107-14. PubMed ID: 25505225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of Diffusion Kurtosis Imaging Versus Standard Diffusion Imaging for Detection and Grading of Peripheral Zone Prostate Cancer.
    Roethke MC; Kuder TA; Kuru TH; Fenchel M; Hadaschik BA; Laun FB; Schlemmer HP; Stieltjes B
    Invest Radiol; 2015 Aug; 50(8):483-9. PubMed ID: 25867657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Whole-Tumor Quantitative Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Histogram and Texture Analysis to Predict Gleason Score Upgrading in Intermediate-Risk 3 + 4 = 7 Prostate Cancer.
    Rozenberg R; Thornhill RE; Flood TA; Hakim SW; Lim C; Schieda N
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2016 Apr; 206(4):775-82. PubMed ID: 27003049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Multiparametric MRI in detection and staging of prostate cancer.
    Boesen L
    Dan Med J; 2017 Feb; 64(2):. PubMed ID: 28157066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Prostate MRI: diffusion-weighted imaging at 1.5T correlates better with prostatectomy Gleason Grades than TRUS-guided biopsies in peripheral zone tumours.
    Bittencourt LK; Barentsz JO; de Miranda LC; Gasparetto EL
    Eur Radiol; 2012 Feb; 22(2):468-75. PubMed ID: 21913058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Apparent diffusion coefficient values are superior to transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy for the assessment of prostate cancer aggressiveness.
    Li C; Chen M; Wang J; Wang X; Zhang W; Zhang C
    Acta Radiol; 2017 Feb; 58(2):232-239. PubMed ID: 27055916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Non-invasive estimation of prostate cancer aggressiveness using diffusion-weighted MRI and 3D proton MR spectroscopy at 3.0 T.
    Thörmer G; Otto J; Horn LC; Garnov N; Do M; Franz T; Stolzenburg JU; Moche M; Kahn T; Busse H
    Acta Radiol; 2015 Jan; 56(1):121-8. PubMed ID: 24504488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging for the assessment of extracapsular invasion and other staging parameters in patients with prostate cancer candidates for radical prostatectomy.
    Lista F; Gimbernat H; Cáceres F; Rodríguez-Barbero JM; Castillo E; Angulo JC
    Actas Urol Esp; 2014 Jun; 38(5):290-7. PubMed ID: 24387827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Assessment of aggressiveness of prostate cancer: correlation of apparent diffusion coefficient with histologic grade after radical prostatectomy.
    Verma S; Rajesh A; Morales H; Lemen L; Bills G; Delworth M; Gaitonde K; Ying J; Samartunga R; Lamba M
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2011 Feb; 196(2):374-81. PubMed ID: 21257890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Apparent diffusion coefficient value and ratio as noninvasive potential biomarkers to predict prostate cancer grading: comparison with prostate biopsy and radical prostatectomy specimen.
    De Cobelli F; Ravelli S; Esposito A; Giganti F; Gallina A; Montorsi F; Del Maschio A
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Mar; 204(3):550-7. PubMed ID: 25714284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) Ratio Versus Conventional ADC for Detecting Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer With 3-T MRI.
    Bajgiran AM; Mirak SA; Sung K; Sisk AE; Reiter RE; Raman SS
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2019 Sep; 213(3):W134-W142. PubMed ID: 31216201
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The Utility of Diffusion-Weighted Imaging and Perfusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging Parameters for Detecting Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer.
    Cindil E; Oner Y; Sendur HN; Ozdemir H; Gazel E; Tunc L; Cerit MN
    Can Assoc Radiol J; 2019 Nov; 70(4):441-451. PubMed ID: 31561925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Assessment of Prostate Cancer Aggressiveness by Use of the Combination of Quantitative DWI and Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI.
    Hötker AM; Mazaheri Y; Aras Ö; Zheng J; Moskowitz CS; Gondo T; Matsumoto K; Hricak H; Akin O
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2016 Apr; 206(4):756-63. PubMed ID: 26900904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. ADC Metrics From Multiparametric MRI: Histologic Downgrading of Gleason Score 9 or 10 Prostate Cancers Diagnosed at Nontargeted Transrectal Ultrasound-Guided Biopsy.
    Sadoughi N; Krishna S; McInnes MDF; Flood TA; Breau RH; Morash C; Schieda N
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 Sep; 211(3):W158-W165. PubMed ID: 29995495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Values of the Benign Central Zone of the Prostate: Comparison With Low- and High-Grade Prostate Cancer.
    Gupta RT; Kauffman CR; Garcia-Reyes K; Palmeri ML; Madden JF; Polascik TJ; Rosenkrantz AB
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Aug; 205(2):331-6. PubMed ID: 26204283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Prostate cancer vs. post-biopsy hemorrhage: diagnosis with T2- and diffusion-weighted imaging.
    Rosenkrantz AB; Kopec M; Kong X; Melamed J; Dakwar G; Babb JS; Taouli B
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2010 Jun; 31(6):1387-94. PubMed ID: 20512891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Performance of apparent diffusion coefficient values and ratios for the prediction of prostate cancer aggressiveness across different MRI acquisition settings.
    Karaarslan E; Altan Kus A; Alis D; Karaarslan UC; Saglican Y; Argun OB; Kural AR
    Diagn Interv Radiol; 2022 Jan; 28(1):12-20. PubMed ID: 35142611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Risk Stratification of Prostate Cancer Using the Combination of Histogram Analysis of Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Across Tumor Diffusion Volume and Clinical Information: A Pilot Study.
    Zhang Z; Xu H; Xue Y; Li J; Ye Q
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2019 Feb; 49(2):556-564. PubMed ID: 30173421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Preoperative Evaluation of Prostate Cancer Aggressiveness: Using ADC and ADC Ratio in Determining Gleason Score.
    Woo S; Kim SY; Cho JY; Kim SH
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2016 Jul; 207(1):114-20. PubMed ID: 27077643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Stratification of the aggressiveness of prostate cancer using pre-biopsy multiparametric MRI (mpMRI).
    Dwivedi DK; Kumar R; Bora GS; Thulkar S; Sharma S; Gupta SD; Jagannathan NR
    NMR Biomed; 2016 Mar; 29(3):232-8. PubMed ID: 26730884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 21.