These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25505645)

  • 21. Intra- and Inter-Task Reliability of Spatial Attention Measures in Pseudoneglect.
    Learmonth G; Gallagher A; Gibson J; Thut G; Harvey M
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(9):e0138379. PubMed ID: 26378925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Horizontal and vertical pseudoneglect in peri- and extrapersonal space.
    Heber IA; Siebertz S; Wolter M; Kuhlen T; Fimm B
    Brain Cogn; 2010 Aug; 73(3):160-6. PubMed ID: 20537456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Cross-modal influences on attentional asymmetries: Additive effects of attentional orienting and arousal.
    Thomas NA; Barone AJ; Flew AH; Nicholls MER
    Neuropsychologia; 2017 Feb; 96():39-51. PubMed ID: 28063992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Spatial bias in figure placement in representational drawing: Associations with handedness and script directionality.
    Faghihi N; Garcia O; Vaid J
    Laterality; 2019 Sep; 24(5):614-630. PubMed ID: 30580664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Numerical processing overcomes left neglect for the greyscales task.
    Loftus AM; Nicholls ME; Mattingley JB; Bradshaw JL
    Neuroreport; 2008 May; 19(8):835-8. PubMed ID: 18463497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The orienting response drives pseudoneglect-Evidence from an objective pupillometric method.
    Strauch C; Romein C; Naber M; Van der Stigchel S; Ten Brink AF
    Cortex; 2022 Jun; 151():259-271. PubMed ID: 35462203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Upper and lower visual field differences in perceptual asymmetries.
    Thomas NA; Elias LJ
    Brain Res; 2011 Apr; 1387():108-15. PubMed ID: 21362412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Spatial bias: effects of early reading direction on Korean subjects.
    Barrett AM; Kim M; Crucian GP; Heilman KM
    Neuropsychologia; 2002; 40(7):1003-12. PubMed ID: 11900752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Dorsal stream contributions to perceptual asymmetries.
    Thomas NA; Schneider O; Gutwin C; Elias LJ
    J Int Neuropsychol Soc; 2012 Mar; 18(2):251-9. PubMed ID: 22133034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Visuospatial perception is not affected by self-related information.
    Ten Brink AF; de Haan R; Amelink DR; Holweg AN; Sui J; Bultitude JH
    Conscious Cogn; 2023 Jan; 107():103451. PubMed ID: 36463796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Exploring bias in horizontal and vertical spatial representations using mental number lines and the greyscales task.
    Bultitude JH; Ten Brink AF
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2024 Mar; 243():104115. PubMed ID: 38228071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The Trajectory of Pseudoneglect in Adults: A Systematic Review.
    Friedrich TE; Hunter PV; Elias LJ
    Neuropsychol Rev; 2018 Dec; 28(4):436-452. PubMed ID: 30460436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Pseudoneglect in line bisection judgement is associated with a modulation of right hemispheric spatial attention dominance in right-handers.
    Zago L; Petit L; Jobard G; Hay J; Mazoyer B; Tzourio-Mazoyer N; Karnath HO; Mellet E
    Neuropsychologia; 2017 Jan; 94():75-83. PubMed ID: 27916670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Finding centre: ocular and fMRI investigations of bisection and landmark task performance.
    Cavézian C; Valadao D; Hurwitz M; Saoud M; Danckert J
    Brain Res; 2012 Feb; 1437():89-103. PubMed ID: 22230669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Reading direction and spatial neglect.
    Speedie LJ; Wertman E; Verfaellie M; Butter C; Silberman N; Liechtenstein M; Heilman KM
    Cortex; 2002 Feb; 38(1):59-67. PubMed ID: 11999334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The effect of strategy on pseudoneglect for luminance judgements.
    Nicholls ME; Mattingley JB; Bradshaw JL
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Sep; 25(1):71-7. PubMed ID: 15919185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Attentional asymmetry between visual hemifields is related to habitual direction of reading and its implications for debate on cause and effects of dyslexia.
    Kermani M; Verghese A; Vidyasagar TR
    Dyslexia; 2018 Feb; 24(1):33-43. PubMed ID: 29214682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Intra- and inter-task reliability of spatial attention measures in healthy older adults.
    Märker G; Learmonth G; Thut G; Harvey M
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(12):e0226424. PubMed ID: 31869372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Native reading direction and corresponding preferences for left- or right-lit images.
    Smith AK; Elias LJ
    Percept Mot Skills; 2013 Apr; 116(2):355-67. PubMed ID: 24032316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Attentional and perceptual asymmetries in an immersive decision-making task.
    Klatt S; Ford PR; Smeeton NJ
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 May; 82(4):1847-1857. PubMed ID: 31808113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.