These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25505769)

  • 1. Evaluation of Effective Sources in Uncertainty Measurements of Personal Dosimetry by a Harshaw TLD System.
    Hosseini Pooya S; Orouji T
    J Biomed Phys Eng; 2014 Jun; 4(2):43-8. PubMed ID: 25505769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A STUDY ON THE UNCERTAINTY FOR THE ROUTINE DOSIMETRY SERVICE AT THE LEBANESE ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION USING HARSHAW 8814 DOSEMETERS.
    Rizk C; Vanhavere F
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2016 Sep; 170(1-4):168-72. PubMed ID: 26443544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. INTERCOMPARISON ON THE MEASUREMENT OF THE QUANTITY PERSONAL DOSE EQUIVALENT HP(10) IN PHOTON FIELDS. LINEARITY DEPENDENCE, LOWER LIMIT OF DETECTION AND UNCERTAINTY IN MEASUREMENT OF DOSIMETRY SYSTEMS OF INDIVIDUAL MONITORING SERVICES IN GABON AND GHANA.
    Ondo Meye P; Schandorf C; Amoako JK; Manteaw PO; Amoatey EA; Adjei DN
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2017 Dec; 177(3):250-260. PubMed ID: 28402513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Uncertainty analysis of absorbed dose calculations from thermoluminescence dosimeters.
    Kirby TH; Hanson WF; Johnston DA
    Med Phys; 1992; 19(6):1427-33. PubMed ID: 1461205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Instrumentation and dosimeter-size artifacts in quantitative thermoluminescence dosimetry of low-dose fields.
    Meigooni AS; Mishra V; Panth H; Williamson J
    Med Phys; 1995 May; 22(5):555-61. PubMed ID: 7643791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. On the evaluation of the relative sensitivity of commercial TLD readers using well characterized TLD chips.
    Roland T; Esquivel C; Stathakis S; Papanikolaou N
    J BUON; 2008; 13(4):547-51. PubMed ID: 19145678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Response evaluation of two commercial thermoluminescence dosimeters (TLDs) against different parameters.
    Alanazi SF; Alarifi H; Alshehri A; Almurayshid M
    BJR Open; 2023; 5(1):20220035. PubMed ID: 37389000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Type testing the Model 6600 plus automatic TLD reader.
    Velbeck KJ; Luo LZ; Streetz KL
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2006; 120(1-4):303-6. PubMed ID: 16835278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Determination of absorbed dose to water around a clinical HDR (192)Ir source using LiF:Mg,Ti TLDs demonstrates an LET dependence of detector response.
    Carlsson Tedgren A; Elia R; Hedtjarn H; Olsson S; Alm Carlsson G
    Med Phys; 2012 Feb; 39(2):1133-40. PubMed ID: 22320824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Using LiF:Mg,Cu,P TLDs to estimate the absorbed dose to water in liquid water around an 192Ir brachytherapy source.
    Lucas PA; Aubineau-Lanièce I; Lourenço V; Vermesse D; Cutarella D
    Med Phys; 2014 Jan; 41(1):011711. PubMed ID: 24387503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Type Testing of Model 7200 Automatic TLD Reader.
    Malek Mohammadi M; Hosseini Pooya SM
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2017 Apr; 174(1):68-73. PubMed ID: 27084490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Intercomparison of neutron personal dose equivalent measured by thermoluminescence dosimeters.
    Le NT; Hoang TP; Hui Z; Bui DK; Nguyen NQ; Hoang VK; Dinh TH; Nguyen MC; Cao VH; Tran HN
    Appl Radiat Isot; 2024 Mar; 205():111175. PubMed ID: 38194888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Intercomparison exercise within a distributed-dosimetry network.
    Romanyukha A; Voss SP; Benevides LA
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2011 Mar; 144(1-4):300-5. PubMed ID: 21088021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Whole-body dose and energy measurements in radiotherapy by a combination of LiF:Mg,Cu,P and LiF:Mg,Ti.
    Hauri P; Schneider U
    Z Med Phys; 2018 Apr; 28(2):96-109. PubMed ID: 28807441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The study of new calibration features in the Harshaw TLD system.
    Luo LZ
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2007; 125(1-4):93-7. PubMed ID: 17223631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLD) quality assurance network in the Czech Republic.
    Kroutilķková D; Novotný J; Judas L
    Radiother Oncol; 2003 Feb; 66(2):235-44. PubMed ID: 12648796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. SU-E-T-92: on the Use of High-Sensitivity Thermoluminescent Dosimeters (TLDs) for Dosimetric Characterization of Low-Energy Brachytherapy Sources.
    Chen Z; Bongiorni P; Donahue W; Hearn R; Rodgers J; Nath R
    Med Phys; 2012 Jun; 39(6Part11):3723. PubMed ID: 28517162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Response of LiF:Mg,Ti thermoluminescent dosimeters at photon energies relevant to the dosimetry of brachytherapy (<1 MeV).
    Tedgren AC; Hedman A; Grindborg JE; Carlsson GA
    Med Phys; 2011 Oct; 38(10):5539-50. PubMed ID: 21992372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. TLD postal dose intercomparison for megavoltage units in Poland.
    Izewska J; Gajewski R; Gwiazdowska B; Kania M; Rostkowska J
    Radiother Oncol; 1995 Aug; 36(2):143-52. PubMed ID: 7501812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Improvement of Accuracy in Environmental Dosimetry by TLD Cards Using Three-dimensional Calibration Method.
    HosseiniAliabadi SJ; Hosseini Pooya SM; Afarideh H; Mianji F
    J Biomed Phys Eng; 2015 Jun; 5(2):49-52. PubMed ID: 26157729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.