305 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25506145)
1. Comparison of canal transportation and centering ability of rotary protaper, one shape system and wave one system using cone beam computed tomography: An in vitro study.
Tambe VH; Nagmode PS; Abraham S; Patait M; Lahoti PV; Jaju N
J Conserv Dent; 2014 Nov; 17(6):561-5. PubMed ID: 25506145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparative evaluation of shaping ability of V-Taper 2H, ProTaper Next, and HyFlex CM in curved canals using cone-beam computed tomography: An
Shenoi PR; Luniya DA; Badole GP; Makade CS; Kubde R; Khode RT
Indian J Dent Res; 2017; 28(2):181-186. PubMed ID: 28611329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of canal transportation and centering ability of Twisted Files, HyFlex controlled memory, and Wave One using computed tomography scan: An
Kishore A; Gurtu A; Bansal R; Singhal A; Mohan S; Mehrotra A
J Conserv Dent; 2017; 20(3):161-165. PubMed ID: 29279618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparative Analysis of Canal Centering Ability of Different Single File Systems Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography- An In-Vitro Study.
Agarwal RS; Agarwal J; Jain P; Chandra A
J Clin Diagn Res; 2015 May; 9(5):ZC06-10. PubMed ID: 26155551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Measure and compare the Degree of Root Canal Transportation and Canal-centering ability of Twisted, ProTaper, and Conventional Stainless Steel K Files using Spiral Computed Tomography: An in vitro Study.
Rejula F; Christalin R; Ahmed W; Dinakaran S; Gopinathan AS; Babu A
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2017 Jun; 18(6):463-469. PubMed ID: 28621275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cone-beam computed tomographic analysis of apical transportation and centering ratio of ProTaper and XP-endo Shaper NiTi rotary systems in curved canals: an in vitro study.
Karkehabadi H; Siahvashi Z; Shokri A; Haji Hasani N
BMC Oral Health; 2021 May; 21(1):277. PubMed ID: 34034735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A micro-computed tomography-based comparison of the canal transportation and centering ability of ProTaper Universal rotary and WaveOne reciprocating files.
McRay B; Cox TC; Cohenca N; Johnson JD; Paranjpe A
Quintessence Int; 2014 Feb; 45(2):101-8. PubMed ID: 24389561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cone-beam computed tomography evaluation of curved root canals prepared using reciprocal rotary files and rotational rotary files.
Jainaen A; Mahakunakorn N; Arayatrakullikit U; Sutthiprapaporn P; Noisombat R
J Conserv Dent; 2018; 21(1):32-36. PubMed ID: 29628644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Transportation and Centering Ability of Neoniti and ProTaper Instruments; A CBCT Assessment.
Madani Z; Soleymani A; Bagheri T; Moudi E; Bijani A; Rakhshan V
Iran Endod J; 2017; 12(1):43-49. PubMed ID: 28179923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cone-beam Computed Tomographic Assessment of Canal Centering Ability and Transportation after Preparation with Twisted File and Bio RaCe Instrumentation.
Honardar K; Assadian H; Shahab S; Jafari Z; Kazemi A; Nazarimoghaddam K; Kharrazifard MJ; Labbaf H
J Dent (Tehran); 2014 Jul; 11(4):440-6. PubMed ID: 25584056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparative Evaluation of Root Canal Centering Ability of ProTaper, Mtwo, WaveOne, and Reciproc Using Cone-beam Computed Tomography:
Remya M; Singh P; Varughese A; Joseph A; Chandran P; Subramanian D; Kumar SV
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2022 Sep; 23(6):589-592. PubMed ID: 36259296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparative evaluation of shaping ability of different rotary NiTi instruments in curved canals using CBCT.
Arora A; Taneja S; Kumar M
J Conserv Dent; 2014 Jan; 17(1):35-9. PubMed ID: 24554858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cone-beam computed tomography analysis of curved root canals after mechanical preparation with three nickel-titanium rotary instruments.
Elsherief SM; Zayet MK; Hamouda IM
J Biomed Res; 2013 Jul; 27(4):326-35. PubMed ID: 23885273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cone-beam Computed Tomographic Analysis of Deciduous Root Canals after Instrumentation with Different Filing Systems: An
Singh P; Saha S; Tripathi AM; Yadav G; Dhinsa K
Int J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2022; 15(Suppl 1):S22-S29. PubMed ID: 35645508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison Of Centering Ability And Transportation Of The Protaper Next And Oneshape File Rotary Systems For Preparing Simulated Curved Canal.
Zafar K; Badar SB; Ghafoor R; Khan FR
J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad; 2021; 33(2):202-206. PubMed ID: 34137529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Canal Transportation and Centering Ability of ProTaper and SafeSider in Preparation of Curved Root Canals: A CBCT Evaluation.
Delgoshayi N; Abbasi M; Bakhtiar H; Sakhdari S; Ghannad S; Ellini MR
Iran Endod J; 2018; 13(2):240-245. PubMed ID: 29707022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. CT evaluation of canal preparation using rotary and hand NI-TI instruments: An in vitro study.
Nagaraja S; Sreenivasa Murthy BV
J Conserv Dent; 2010 Jan; 13(1):16-22. PubMed ID: 20582214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Computed Tomography Evaluation of Canal Transportation and Volumetric Changes in Root Canal Dentin of Curved Canals Using Mtwo, ProTaper and ProTaper Next Rotary System-An In-vitro Study.
Shivashankar MB; Niranjan NT; Jayasheel A; Kenchanagoudra MG
J Clin Diagn Res; 2016 Nov; 10(11):ZC10-ZC14. PubMed ID: 28050495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Shaping Ability of Two-shape and ProTaper Gold Files by using Cone-beam Computed Tomography.
Singh S; Gupta T; Pandey V; Singhania H; Pandey P; Gangavane S
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2019 Mar; 20(3):330-334. PubMed ID: 31204326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparative study of ProTaper gold, reciproc, and ProTaper universal for root canal preparation in severely curved root canals.
Arslan H; Yildiz ED; Gunduz HA; Sumbullu M; Bayrakdar IS; Karatas E; Sumbullu MA
J Conserv Dent; 2017; 20(4):222-224. PubMed ID: 29259355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
