These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25506247)

  • 1. Bias in identification of the best treatment in a Bayesian network meta-analysis for binary outcome: a simulation study.
    Kibret T; Richer D; Beyene J
    Clin Epidemiol; 2014; 6():451-60. PubMed ID: 25506247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Degree irregularity and rank probability bias in network meta-analysis.
    Davies AL; Galla T
    Res Synth Methods; 2021 May; 12(3):316-332. PubMed ID: 32935913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Quantitative summaries of treatment effect estimates obtained with network meta-analysis of survival curves to inform decision-making.
    Cope S; Jansen JP
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2013 Dec; 13():147. PubMed ID: 24289277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Using decision thresholds for ranking treatments in network meta-analysis results in more informative rankings.
    Brignardello-Petersen R; Johnston BC; Jadad AR; Tomlinson G
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2018 Jun; 98():62-69. PubMed ID: 29454030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An empirical comparison of Bayesian modelling strategies for missing binary outcome data in network meta-analysis.
    Spineli LM
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2019 Apr; 19(1):86. PubMed ID: 31018836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Participants' outcomes gone missing within a network of interventions: Bayesian modeling strategies.
    Spineli LM; Kalyvas C; Pateras K
    Stat Med; 2019 Sep; 38(20):3861-3879. PubMed ID: 31134664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A Markov chain approach for ranking treatments in network meta-analysis.
    Chaimani A; Porcher R; Sbidian É; Mavridis D
    Stat Med; 2021 Jan; 40(2):451-464. PubMed ID: 33105517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Rapid methods including network meta-analysis to produce evidence in clinical decision support: a decision analysis.
    Eiring Ø; Brurberg KG; Nytrøen K; Nylenna M
    Syst Rev; 2018 Oct; 7(1):168. PubMed ID: 30342549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The Use of (Network) Meta-Analysis in Clinical Oncology.
    Ter Veer E; van Oijen MGH; van Laarhoven HWM
    Front Oncol; 2019; 9():822. PubMed ID: 31508373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A review and comparison of arm-based versus contrast-based network meta-analysis for binary outcomes-Understanding their differences and limitations.
    Chu H; Lin L; Wang Z; Wang Z; Chen Y; Cappelleri JC
    Wiley Interdiscip Rev Comput Stat; 2024; 16(1):. PubMed ID: 38818353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Bayesian unanchored additive models for component network meta-analysis.
    Wigle A; Béliveau A
    Stat Med; 2022 Sep; 41(22):4444-4466. PubMed ID: 35844085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A Gentle Introduction to Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis Using an Automated R Package.
    Liu Y; Béliveau A; Wei Y; Chen MY; Record-Lemon R; Kuo PL; Pritchard E; Tang X; Chen G
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2023; 58(4):706-722. PubMed ID: 36254763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Antithrombotic therapy in patients receiving saphenous vein coronary artery bypass grafts: a protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis.
    Solo K; Martin J; Lavi S; Kabali C; John-Baptiste A; Nevis IF; Choudhury T; Mamas MA; Bagur R
    BMJ Open; 2018 Apr; 8(4):e019555. PubMed ID: 29627809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Methods and characteristics of published network meta-analyses using individual patient data: protocol for a scoping review.
    Veroniki AA; Soobiah C; Tricco AC; Elliott MJ; Straus SE
    BMJ Open; 2015 Apr; 5(4):e007103. PubMed ID: 25926144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Which Surgical Treatment for Open Tibial Shaft Fractures Results in the Fewest Reoperations? A Network Meta-analysis.
    Foote CJ; Guyatt GH; Vignesh KN; Mundi R; Chaudhry H; Heels-Ansdell D; Thabane L; Tornetta P; Bhandari M
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Jul; 473(7):2179-92. PubMed ID: 25724836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The efficacy and safety comparison of surgical treatments for stress urinary incontinence: A network meta-analysis.
    Song P; Wen Y; Huang C; Wang W; Yuan N; Lu Y; Wang Q; Zhang T; Wen J
    Neurourol Urodyn; 2018 Apr; 37(4):1199-1211. PubMed ID: 29331033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Ranking crop species using mixed treatment comparisons.
    Albert I; Makowski D
    Res Synth Methods; 2019 Sep; 10(3):343-359. PubMed ID: 30353974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Network meta-analysis: development of a three-level hierarchical modeling approach incorporating dose-related constraints.
    Owen RK; Tincello DG; Keith RA
    Value Health; 2015 Jan; 18(1):116-26. PubMed ID: 25595242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Approaches to interpreting and choosing the best treatments in network meta-analyses.
    Mbuagbaw L; Rochwerg B; Jaeschke R; Heels-Andsell D; Alhazzani W; Thabane L; Guyatt GH
    Syst Rev; 2017 Apr; 6(1):79. PubMed ID: 28403893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.