These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25506647)
1. Load limit of mini-implants with reduced abutment height based on fatigue fracture resistance: experimental and finite element study. Toyoshima Y; Wakabayashi N Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2015; 30(1):e10-6. PubMed ID: 25506647 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Influence of implant abutment type on stress distribution in bone under various loading conditions using finite element analysis. Chun HJ; Shin HS; Han CH; Lee SH Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2006; 21(2):195-202. PubMed ID: 16634489 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Load fatigue performance of conical implant-abutment connections. Seetoh YL; Tan KB; Chua EK; Quek HC; Nicholls JI Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(4):797-806. PubMed ID: 21841990 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Load fatigue performance of implant-ceramic abutment combinations. Nguyen HQ; Tan KB; Nicholls JI Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(4):636-46. PubMed ID: 19885403 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A finite element analysis of two different dental implants: stress distribution in the prosthesis, abutment, implant, and supporting bone. Quaresma SE; Cury PR; Sendyk WR; Sendyk C J Oral Implantol; 2008; 34(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 18390236 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Platform switching: biomechanical evaluation using three-dimensional finite element analysis. Tabata LF; Rocha EP; Barão VA; Assunção WG Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(3):482-91. PubMed ID: 21691594 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Mechanical Resistance of a 2.9-mm-Diameter Dental Implant With a Morse-Taper Implant-Abutment Connection. Alberti A; Corbella S; Francetti L J Oral Implantol; 2023 Jun; 49(3):323-329. PubMed ID: 36796063 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Rotational Load Fatigue Performance of Titanium vs Titanium-Zirconium Implant-Abutment Connections. Leo SJ; Tan MY; Yee SHX; Lee FKF; Tan KBC Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2022; 37(4):740-747. PubMed ID: 35904830 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of strain generated in bone by "platform-switched" and "non-platform-switched" implants with straight and angulated abutments under vertical and angulated load: a finite element analysis study. Paul S; Padmanabhan TV; Swarup S Indian J Dent Res; 2013; 24(1):8-13. PubMed ID: 23852226 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. In vitro assessment of three types of zirconia implant abutments under static load. Kim JS; Raigrodski AJ; Flinn BD; Rubenstein JE; Chung KH; Mancl LA J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Apr; 109(4):255-63. PubMed ID: 23566607 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of titanium and yttrium-stabilized zirconium dioxide abutments and implants. Çaglar A; Bal BT; Karakoca S; Aydın C; Yılmaz H; Sarısoy S Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(5):961-9. PubMed ID: 22010077 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Stress analysis in platform-switching implants: a 3-dimensional finite element study. Pellizzer EP; Verri FR; Falcón-Antenucci RM; Júnior JF; de Carvalho PS; de Moraes SL; Noritomi PY J Oral Implantol; 2012 Oct; 38(5):587-94. PubMed ID: 20932121 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Dynamic fatigue properties of the dental implant-abutment interface: joint opening in wide-diameter versus standard-diameter hex-type implants. Hoyer SA; Stanford CM; Buranadham S; Fridrich T; Wagner J; Gratton D J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Jun; 85(6):599-607. PubMed ID: 11404760 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Influence of the height of the external hexagon and surface treatment on fatigue life of commercially pure titanium dental implants. Gil FJ; Aparicio C; Manero JM; Padros A Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(4):583-90. PubMed ID: 19885397 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Load fatigue performance of a single-tooth implant abutment system: effect of diameter. Quek CE; Tan KB; Nicholls JI Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2006; 21(6):929-36. PubMed ID: 17190303 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Bending moments of zirconia and titanium implant abutments supporting all-ceramic crowns after aging. Mühlemann S; Truninger TC; Stawarczyk B; Hämmerle CH; Sailer I Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 Jan; 25(1):74-81. PubMed ID: 23735182 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Selection of the implant transgingival height for optimal biomechanical properties: a three-dimensional finite element analysis. Sun Y; Kong L; Hu K; Xie C; Zhou H; Liu Y; Liu B Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Jul; 47(5):393-8. PubMed ID: 18977057 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The dynamic natures of implant loading. Wang RF; Kang B; Lang LA; Razzoog ME J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Jun; 101(6):359-71. PubMed ID: 19463663 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of the mechanical characteristics of the implant-abutment complex of a reduced-diameter morse-taper implant. A nonlinear finite element stress analysis. Akça K; Cehreli MC; Iplikçioğlu H Clin Oral Implants Res; 2003 Aug; 14(4):444-54. PubMed ID: 12869007 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. In vitro fatigue tests and in silico finite element analysis of dental implants with different fixture/abutment joint types using computer-aided design models. Yamaguchi S; Yamanishi Y; Machado LS; Matsumoto S; Tovar N; Coelho PG; Thompson VP; Imazato S J Prosthodont Res; 2018 Jan; 62(1):24-30. PubMed ID: 28427837 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]