These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

197 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25509819)

  • 1. The sustained attention to response task (SART) does not promote mindlessness during vigilance performance.
    Dillard MB; Warm JS; Funke GJ; Funke ME; Finomore VS; Matthews G; Shaw TH; Parasuraman R
    Hum Factors; 2014 Dec; 56(8):1364-79. PubMed ID: 25509819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The vigilance decrement reflects limitations in effortful attention, not mindlessness.
    Grier RA; Warm JS; Dember WN; Matthews G; Galinsky TL; Parasuraman R
    Hum Factors; 2003; 45(3):349-59. PubMed ID: 14702988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Signal regularity and the mindlessness model of vigilance.
    Helton WS; Hollander TD; Warm JS; Matthews G; Dember WN; Wallaart M; Beauchamp G; Parasuraman R; Hancock PA
    Br J Psychol; 2005 May; 96(Pt 2):249-61. PubMed ID: 15969834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Sustained attention failures are primarily due to sustained cognitive load not task monotony.
    Head J; Helton WS
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2014 Nov; 153():87-94. PubMed ID: 25310454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Global interference and spatial uncertainty in the Sustained Attention to Response Task (SART).
    Helton WS; Weil L; Middlemiss A; Sawers A
    Conscious Cogn; 2010 Mar; 19(1):77-85. PubMed ID: 20138552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Use of EEG workload indices for diagnostic monitoring of vigilance decrement.
    Kamzanova AT; Kustubayeva AM; Matthews G
    Hum Factors; 2014 Sep; 56(6):1136-49. PubMed ID: 25277022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Target predictability, sustained attention, and response inhibition.
    Carter L; Russell PN; Helton WS
    Brain Cogn; 2013 Jun; 82(1):35-42. PubMed ID: 23501702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The Independence and Interdependence of Coacting Observers in Regard to Performance Efficiency, Workload, and Stress in a Vigilance Task.
    Funke GJ; Warm JS; Baldwin CL; Garcia A; Funke ME; Dillard MB; Finomore VS; Matthews G; Greenlee ET
    Hum Factors; 2016 Sep; 58(6):915-26. PubMed ID: 27150529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Event-related cerebral hemodynamics reveal target-specific resource allocation for both "go" and "no-go" response-based vigilance tasks.
    Shaw TH; Funke ME; Dillard M; Funke GJ; Warm JS; Parasuraman R
    Brain Cogn; 2013 Aug; 82(3):265-73. PubMed ID: 23727665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Natural scene stimuli and lapses of sustained attention.
    Head J; Helton WS
    Conscious Cogn; 2012 Dec; 21(4):1617-25. PubMed ID: 23000831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Viewing the workload of vigilance through the lenses of the NASA-TLX and the MRQ.
    Finomore VS; Shaw TH; Warm JS; Matthews G; Boles DB
    Hum Factors; 2013 Dec; 55(6):1044-63. PubMed ID: 24745198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Feature absence-presence and two theories of lapses of sustained attention.
    Helton WS; Russell PN
    Psychol Res; 2011 Sep; 75(5):384-92. PubMed ID: 21103888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Sustained Attention in Auditory and Visual Monitoring Tasks: Evaluation of the Administration of a Rest Break or Exogenous Vibrotactile Signals.
    Arrabito GR; Ho G; Aghaei B; Burns C; Hou M
    Hum Factors; 2015 Dec; 57(8):1403-16. PubMed ID: 26276365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Real-time performance modelling of a Sustained Attention to Response Task.
    Larue GS; Rakotonirainy A; Pettitt AN
    Ergonomics; 2010 Oct; 53(10):1205-16. PubMed ID: 20865604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Task engagement, cerebral blood flow velocity, and diagnostic monitoring for sustained attention.
    Matthews G; Warm JS; Reinerman-Jones LE; Langheim LK; Washburn DA; Tripp L
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2010 Jun; 16(2):187-203. PubMed ID: 20565203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Signal salience and the mindlessness theory of vigilance.
    Helton WS; Warm JS
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Sep; 129(1):18-25. PubMed ID: 18499079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The quick and the dead: A paradigm for studying friendly fire.
    Munnik A; Näswall K; Woodward G; Helton WS
    Appl Ergon; 2020 Apr; 84():103032. PubMed ID: 31987515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. You are measuring the decision to be fast, not inattention: the Sustained Attention to Response Task does not measure sustained attention.
    Dang JS; Figueroa IJ; Helton WS
    Exp Brain Res; 2018 Aug; 236(8):2255-2262. PubMed ID: 29846798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of sensory modality and task duration on performance, workload, and stress in sustained attention.
    Szalma JL; Warm JS; Matthews G; Dember WN; Weiler EM; Meier A; Eggemeier FT
    Hum Factors; 2004; 46(2):219-33. PubMed ID: 15359672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effects of warning cues and attention-capturing stimuli on the sustained attention to response task.
    Finkbeiner KM; Wilson KM; Russell PN; Helton WS
    Exp Brain Res; 2015 Apr; 233(4):1061-8. PubMed ID: 25537468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.