These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

213 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25510192)

  • 1. Challenges for defining minimal clinically important difference (MCID) after spinal cord injury.
    Wu X; Liu J; Tanadini LG; Lammertse DP; Blight AR; Kramer JL; Scivoletto G; Jones L; Kirshblum S; Abel R; Fawcett J; Field-Fote E; Guest J; Levinson B; Maier D; Tansey K; Weidner N; Tetzlaff WG; Hothorn T; Curt A; Steeves JD
    Spinal Cord; 2015 Feb; 53(2):84-91. PubMed ID: 25510192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Minimal Clinically Important Difference of Graded Redefined Assessment of Strength, Sensibility, and Prehension Version 1 in Acute Cervical Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury.
    Kalsi-Ryan S; Balbinot G; Wang JZ; Abel R; Bolliger M; Curt A; Fehlings MG; Jin D; Verrier M; Velstra IM
    J Neurotrauma; 2022 Dec; 39(23-24):1645-1653. PubMed ID: 35652348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. What do spinal cord injury patients think of their improvement? A study of the minimal clinically important difference of the Spinal Cord Independence Measure III.
    Corallo V; Torre M; Ferrara G; Guerra F; Nicosia G; Romanelli E; Lopopolo A; Onesta MP; Fiore P; Falcone R; Bonavita J; Molinari M; Scivoletto G
    Eur J Phys Rehabil Med; 2017 Aug; 53(4):508-515. PubMed ID: 28084060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Outcome measures in spinal cord injury: recent assessments and recommendations for future directions.
    Alexander MS; Anderson KD; Biering-Sorensen F; Blight AR; Brannon R; Bryce TN; Creasey G; Catz A; Curt A; Donovan W; Ditunno J; Ellaway P; Finnerup NB; Graves DE; Haynes BA; Heinemann AW; Jackson AB; Johnston MV; Kalpakjian CZ; Kleitman N; Krassioukov A; Krogh K; Lammertse D; Magasi S; Mulcahey MJ; Schurch B; Sherwood A; Steeves JD; Stiens S; Tulsky DS; van Hedel HJ; Whiteneck G
    Spinal Cord; 2009 Aug; 47(8):582-91. PubMed ID: 19381157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Patient-reported outcomes 3 months after spine surgery: is it an accurate predictor of 12-month outcome in real-world registry platforms?
    Parker SL; Asher AL; Godil SS; Devin CJ; McGirt MJ
    Neurosurg Focus; 2015 Dec; 39(6):E17. PubMed ID: 26621415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. What is the Minimum Clinically Important Difference for the WOMAC Index After TKA?
    Clement ND; Bardgett M; Weir D; Holland J; Gerrand C; Deehan DJ
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2018 Oct; 476(10):2005-2014. PubMed ID: 30179956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Outcome of the upper limb in cervical spinal cord injury: Profiles of recovery and insights for clinical studies.
    Kalsi-Ryan S; Beaton D; Curt A; Popovic MR; Verrier MC; Fehlings MG
    J Spinal Cord Med; 2014 Sep; 37(5):503-10. PubMed ID: 25229734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Neurological and functional status 1 year after acute spinal cord injury: estimates of functional recovery in National Acute Spinal Cord Injury Study II from results modeled in National Acute Spinal Cord Injury Study III.
    Bracken MB; Holford TR
    J Neurosurg; 2002 Apr; 96(3 Suppl):259-66. PubMed ID: 11990832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Assessment of the minimum clinically important difference in pain, disability, and quality of life after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: clinical article.
    Parker SL; Godil SS; Shau DN; Mendenhall SK; McGirt MJ
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2013 Feb; 18(2):154-60. PubMed ID: 23176164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Defining the minimum clinically important difference for grade I degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: insights from the Quality Outcomes Database.
    Asher AL; Kerezoudis P; Mummaneni PV; Bisson EF; Glassman SD; Foley KT; Slotkin JR; Potts EA; Shaffrey ME; Shaffrey CI; Coric D; Knightly JJ; Park P; Fu KM; Devin CJ; Archer KR; Chotai S; Chan AK; Virk MS; Bydon M
    Neurosurg Focus; 2018 Jan; 44(1):E2. PubMed ID: 29290132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Acute Traumatic and Ischemic Spinal Cord Injuries Have a Comparable Course of Recovery.
    Scivoletto G; Torre M; Mammone A; Maier DD; Weidner N; Schubert M; Rupp R; Abel R; Yorck-Bernhard K; Jiri K; Curt A; Molinari M
    Neurorehabil Neural Repair; 2020 Aug; 34(8):723-732. PubMed ID: 32659165
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Severe pressure ulcers requiring surgery impair the functional outcome after acute spinal cord injury.
    Donhauser M; Grassner L; Klein B; Voth M; Mach O; Vogel M; Maier D; Schneidmueller D
    Spinal Cord; 2020 Jan; 58(1):70-77. PubMed ID: 31312018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Defining minimal clinically important differences in pain and disability outcomes of patients with chronic pain treated with spinal cord stimulation.
    Sabourin S; Tram J; Sheldon BL; Pilitsis JG
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2021 Aug; 35(2):243-250. PubMed ID: 34087802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The quality of spine surgery from the patient's perspective: part 2. Minimal clinically important difference for improvement and deterioration as measured with the Core Outcome Measures Index.
    Mannion AF; Porchet F; Kleinstück FS; Lattig F; Jeszenszky D; Bartanusz V; Dvorak J; Grob D
    Eur Spine J; 2009 Aug; 18 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):374-9. PubMed ID: 19296136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. What is an acceptable outcome of treatment before it begins? Methodological considerations and implications for patients with chronic low back pain.
    Lauridsen HH; Manniche C; Korsholm L; Grunnet-Nilsson N; Hartvigsen J
    Eur Spine J; 2009 Dec; 18(12):1858-66. PubMed ID: 19544075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. What Preoperative Factors are Associated With Not Achieving a Minimum Clinically Important Difference After THA? Findings from an International Multicenter Study.
    Rojanasopondist P; Galea VP; Connelly JW; Matuszak SJ; Rolfson O; Bragdon CR; Malchau H
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2019 Jun; 477(6):1301-1312. PubMed ID: 31136425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Determination of minimum clinically important difference in pain, disability, and quality of life after extension of fusion for adjacent-segment disease.
    Parker SL; Mendenhall SK; Shau D; Adogwa O; Cheng JS; Anderson WN; Devin CJ; McGirt MJ
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2012 Jan; 16(1):61-7. PubMed ID: 21962034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Minimum clinically important difference in pain, disability, and quality of life after neural decompression and fusion for same-level recurrent lumbar stenosis: understanding clinical versus statistical significance.
    Parker SL; Mendenhall SK; Shau DN; Adogwa O; Anderson WN; Devin CJ; McGirt MJ
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2012 May; 16(5):471-8. PubMed ID: 22324801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The Minimum Clinically Important Difference of the Modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association Scale in Patients with Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy.
    Tetreault L; Nouri A; Kopjar B; Côté P; Fehlings MG
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2015 Nov; 40(21):1653-9. PubMed ID: 26502097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Establishing Minimal Clinically Important Difference of Spinal Cord Stimulation Therapy in Post-Laminectomy Syndrome.
    Paul AR; Kumar V; Roth S; Gooch MR; Pilitsis JG
    Neurosurgery; 2017 Dec; 81(6):1011-1015. PubMed ID: 28973581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.