These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
375 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25510295)
1. IOP agreement between I-Care TA01 rebound tonometer and the Goldmann applanation tonometer in eyes with and without glaucoma. Sinha G; Gupta S; Temkar S; Pandey V; Sihota R; Dada T Int Ophthalmol; 2015 Feb; 35(1):89-93. PubMed ID: 25510295 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of the new rebound tonometer with Goldmann applanation tonometer in a clinical setting. Kim KN; Jeoung JW; Park KH; Yang MK; Kim DM Acta Ophthalmol; 2013 Aug; 91(5):e392-6. PubMed ID: 23521889 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of the rebound tonometer with the Goldmann applanation tonometer in glaucoma patients. Sahin A; Niyaz L; Yildirim N Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2007; 35(4):335-9. PubMed ID: 17539785 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Agreement among Goldmann applanation tonometer, iCare, and Icare PRO rebound tonometers; non-contact tonometer; and Tonopen XL in healthy elderly subjects. Kato Y; Nakakura S; Matsuo N; Yoshitomi K; Handa M; Tabuchi H; Kiuchi Y Int Ophthalmol; 2018 Apr; 38(2):687-696. PubMed ID: 28393323 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Reliability and reproducibility of introcular pressure (IOP) measurement with the Icare Valero B; Fénolland JR; Rosenberg R; Sendon D; Mesnard C; Sigaux M; Giraud JM; Renard JP J Fr Ophtalmol; 2017 Dec; 40(10):865-875. PubMed ID: 29174296 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effect of corneal thickness on dynamic contour, rebound, and goldmann tonometry. Martinez-de-la-Casa JM; Garcia-Feijoo J; Vico E; Fernandez-Vidal A; Benitez del Castillo JM; Wasfi M; Garcia-Sanchez J Ophthalmology; 2006 Dec; 113(12):2156-62. PubMed ID: 16996599 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Can higher end tonometers be used interchangeably in routine clinical practice? Patel KJ; Jain SP; Kapadia PR; Patel NV; Patel S; Patel V Indian J Ophthalmol; 2016 Feb; 64(2):132-5. PubMed ID: 27050348 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparability of three intraocular pressure measurement: iCare pro rebound, non-contact and Goldmann applanation tonometry in different IOP group. Chen M; Zhang L; Xu J; Chen X; Gu Y; Ren Y; Wang K BMC Ophthalmol; 2019 Nov; 19(1):225. PubMed ID: 31726999 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of intraocular pressure measurements and assessment of intraobserver and interobserver reproducibility with the portable ICare rebound tonometer and Goldmann applanation tonometer in glaucoma patients. Salim S; Du H; Wan J J Glaucoma; 2013; 22(4):325-9. PubMed ID: 23542696 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The utility of rebound tonometer in late elderly subjects. Sakata R; Numaga J Clin Interv Aging; 2014; 9():227-32. PubMed ID: 24489462 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of Icare Rebound Tonometer and Perkins Applanation Tonometer in Community Eye Screening. Ting SL; Lim LT; Ooi CY; Rahman MM Asia Pac J Ophthalmol (Phila); 2019; 8(3):229-232. PubMed ID: 31165604 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of intraocular pressure measurements using Goldmann tonometer, I-care pro, Tonopen XL, and Schiotz tonometer in patients after Descemet stripping endothelial keratoplasty. Ohana O; Varssano D; Shemesh G Indian J Ophthalmol; 2017 Jul; 65(7):579-583. PubMed ID: 28724814 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparing applanation tonometry and rebound tonometry in glaucomatous and ocular hypertensive eyes. Marini M; Da Pozzo S; Accardo A; Canziani T Eur J Ophthalmol; 2011; 21(3):258-63. PubMed ID: 20890884 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Performance of the rebound, noncontact and Goldmann applanation tonometers in routine clinical practice. Martinez-de-la-Casa JM; Jimenez-Santos M; Saenz-Frances F; Matilla-Rodero M; Mendez-Hernandez C; Herrero-Vanrell R; Garcia-Feijoo J Acta Ophthalmol; 2011 Nov; 89(7):676-80. PubMed ID: 19900196 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A new tonometer--the Corvis ST tonometer: clinical comparison with noncontact and Goldmann applanation tonometers. Hong J; Xu J; Wei A; Deng SX; Cui X; Yu X; Sun X Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2013 Jan; 54(1):659-65. PubMed ID: 23307970 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A comparison of goldmann applanation tonometry and rebound tonometry measurements among patients attending a glaucoma clinic in Southwest Nigeria. Ashano O; Oderinlo O; Ogunro A; Ashano E Niger J Clin Pract; 2022 Sep; 25(9):1542-1547. PubMed ID: 36149217 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of the Icare ic100 Rebound Tonometer and the Goldmann Applanation Tonometer in 1,000 Eyes. Subramaniam AG; Allen P; Toh T Ophthalmic Res; 2021; 64(2):321-326. PubMed ID: 32906125 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Measurement of the intraocular pressure with the "transpalpebral tonometer" TGDc-01 in comparison with applanation tonometry. Sandner D; Böhm A; Kostov S; Pillunat L Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2005 Jun; 243(6):563-9. PubMed ID: 15614540 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of intraocular pressure measurement between rebound, non-contact and Goldmann applanation tonometry in treated glaucoma patients. Vincent SJ; Vincent RA; Shields D; Lee GA Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2012; 40(4):e163-70. PubMed ID: 21883774 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of Intraocular Pressure Measurements Obtained by Rebound, Noncontact, and Goldmann Applanation Tonometry in Children. Feng CS; Jin KW; Yi K; Choi DG Am J Ophthalmol; 2015 Nov; 160(5):937-943.e1. PubMed ID: 26210864 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]