These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
797 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25511062)
1. Smear layer removal efficacy of different irrigating solutions: a comparative scanning electron microscope evaluation. Ahir B; Parekh V; Katyayan MK; Katyayan PA Indian J Dent Res; 2014; 25(5):617-22. PubMed ID: 25511062 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effectiveness of different final irrigant activation protocols on smear layer removal in curved canals. Caron G; Nham K; Bronnec F; Machtou P J Endod; 2010 Aug; 36(8):1361-6. PubMed ID: 20647097 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of the efficacy of maleic acid and ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid in smear layer removal from instrumented human root canal: a scanning electron microscopic study. Ballal NV; Kandian S; Mala K; Bhat KS; Acharya S J Endod; 2009 Nov; 35(11):1573-6. PubMed ID: 19840650 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of radicular dentin erosion and smear layer removal capacity of Self-Adjusting File using different concentrations of sodium hypochlorite as an initial irrigant. Kaya S; Yiğit-Özer S; Adigüzel Ö Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2011 Oct; 112(4):524-30. PubMed ID: 21664155 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A comparative scanning electron microscopic investigation of the smear layer after the use of sodium hypochlorite gel and solution forms as root canal irrigants. Zand V; Lotfi M; Rahimi S; Mokhtari H; Kazemi A; Sakhamanesh V J Endod; 2010 Jul; 36(7):1234-7. PubMed ID: 20630306 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effects of different irrigation solutions on root dentine microhardness, smear layer removal and erosion. Ulusoy Öİ; Görgül G Aust Endod J; 2013 Aug; 39(2):66-72. PubMed ID: 23890262 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of the smear layer removal and erosive capacity of EDTA, boric acid, citric acid and desy clean solutions: an in vitro study. Turk T; Kaval ME; Şen BH BMC Oral Health; 2015 Sep; 15():104. PubMed ID: 26335205 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effectiveness of ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) and MTAD on debris and smear layer removal using a self-adjusting file. Adigüzel O; Yiğit-Özer S; Kaya S; Uysal İ; Ganidağli-Ayaz S; Akkuş Z Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2011 Dec; 112(6):803-8. PubMed ID: 21873086 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of the effect of four decalcifying agents combined with 60°C 3% sodium hypochlorite on smear layer removal. Wu L; Mu Y; Deng X; Zhang S; Zhou D J Endod; 2012 Mar; 38(3):381-4. PubMed ID: 22341079 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The effectiveness of different acid irrigating solutions in root canal cleaning after hand and rotary instrumentation. Pérez-Heredia M; Ferrer-Luque CM; González-Rodríguez MP J Endod; 2006 Oct; 32(10):993-7. PubMed ID: 16982281 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Efficacy of various root canal irrigants on removal of smear layer in the primary root canals after hand instrumentation: a scanning electron microscopy study. Hariharan VS; Nandlal B; Srilatha KT J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2010; 28(4):271-7. PubMed ID: 21273715 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparative Evaluation of Smear Layer and Debris on the Canal Walls prepared with a Combination of Hand and Rotary ProTaper Technique using Scanning Electron Microscope. Kiran S; Prakash S; Siddharth PR; Saha S; Geojan NE; Ramachandran M J Contemp Dent Pract; 2016 Jul; 17(7):574-81. PubMed ID: 27595725 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The effect of different irrigation protocols on smear layer removal in root canals of primary teeth: a SEM study. Demirel A; Yüksel BN; Ziya M; Gümüş H; Doğan S; Sari Ş Acta Odontol Scand; 2019 Jul; 77(5):380-385. PubMed ID: 30859897 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The effect of application time of EDTA and NaOCl on intracanal smear layer removal: an SEM analysis. Teixeira CS; Felippe MC; Felippe WT Int Endod J; 2005 May; 38(5):285-90. PubMed ID: 15876291 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effect of passive ultrasonic irrigation and manual dynamic irrigation on smear layer removal from root canals in a closed apex in vitro model. Andrabi SM; Kumar A; Zia A; Iftekhar H; Alam S; Siddiqui S J Investig Clin Dent; 2014 Aug; 5(3):188-93. PubMed ID: 23595996 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Efficacy of four different irrigation techniques combined with 60 °C 3% sodium hypochlorite and 17% EDTA in smear layer removal. Guo X; Miao H; Li L; Zhang S; Zhou D; Lu Y; Wu L BMC Oral Health; 2014 Sep; 14():114. PubMed ID: 25201549 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) solution and gel for smear layer removal. Dotto SR; Travassos RM; de Oliveira EP; Machado ME; Martins JL Aust Endod J; 2007 Aug; 33(2):62-5. PubMed ID: 17697246 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of the efficacy of Smear Clear with and without a canal brush in smear layer and debris removal from instrumented root canal using WaveOne versus ProTaper: a scanning electron microscopic study. Kamel WH; Kataia EM J Endod; 2014 Mar; 40(3):446-50. PubMed ID: 24565669 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Efficacy of sodium hypochlorite, ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid, citric acid and phosphoric acid in calcium hydroxide removal from the root canal: a microscopic cleanliness evaluation. da Silva JM; Silveira A; Santos E; Prado L; Pessoa OF Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2011 Dec; 112(6):820-4. PubMed ID: 22099858 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The effect of different concentrations of EDTA on instrumented root canal walls. Sen BH; Ertürk O; Pişkin B Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2009 Oct; 108(4):622-7. PubMed ID: 19699113 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]