These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25511065)

  • 1. Strain gauges's analysis on implant-retained prosthesis' cast accuracy.
    Rodrigues MA; Luthi LF; Takahashi JM; Nobilo MA; Henriques GE
    Indian J Dent Res; 2014; 25(5):635-40. PubMed ID: 25511065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The influence of master cast technique on the cast precision of implant-retained fixed prostheses.
    Rodrigues MA; Luthi LF; Henriques GE
    Gen Dent; 2012; 60(2):122-7; quiz 128-9. PubMed ID: 22414505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Impression techniques and misfit-induced strains on implant-supported superstructures: an in vitro study.
    Cehreli MC; Akça K
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2006 Aug; 26(4):379-85. PubMed ID: 16939020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. In vitro vertical misfit evaluation of cast frameworks for cement-retained implant-supported partial prostheses.
    Oyagüe RC; Turrión AS; Toledano M; Monticelli F; Osorio R
    J Dent; 2009 Jan; 37(1):52-8. PubMed ID: 18951675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A comparison of the accuracy of polyether, polyvinyl siloxane, and plaster impressions for long-span implant-supported prostheses.
    Hoods-Moonsammy VJ; Owen P; Howes DG
    Int J Prosthodont; 2014; 27(5):433-8. PubMed ID: 25191885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Over-refractory casting technique as an alternative to one-piece multi-unit fixed partial denture frameworks.
    de Oliveira Correa G; Henriques GE; Mesquita MF; Sobrinho LC
    J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Mar; 95(3):243-8. PubMed ID: 16543023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of impression techniques and materials for an implant-supported prosthesis.
    Del'Acqua MA; Chávez AM; Amaral AL; Compagnoni MA; Mollo Fde A
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(4):771-6. PubMed ID: 20657873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of casting atmosphere on the marginal deficiency and misfit of Ni-Cr alloys with and without beryllium.
    da Silva LJ; Leal MB; Valente MLC; de Castro DT; Pagnano VO; Dos Reis AC; Bezzon OL
    J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Jul; 118(1):83-88. PubMed ID: 27927286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of splinting in accuracy of two implant impression techniques.
    de Avila ED; de Matos Moraes F; Castanharo SM; Del'Acqua MA; de Assis Mollo F
    J Oral Implantol; 2014 Dec; 40(6):633-9. PubMed ID: 25506658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A comparative study of the accuracy between plastic and metal impression transfer copings for implant restorations.
    Fernandez MA; Paez de Mendoza CY; Platt JA; Levon JA; Hovijitra ST; Nimmo A
    J Prosthodont; 2013 Jul; 22(5):367-76. PubMed ID: 23387412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of accuracy of casts of multiple internal connection implant prosthesis obtained from different impression materials and techniques: an in vitro study.
    Pujari M; Garg P; Prithviraj DR
    J Oral Implantol; 2014 Apr; 40(2):137-45. PubMed ID: 24456531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Accuracy of impression techniques for an implant-supported prosthesis.
    Del'Acqua MA; Chávez AM; Compagnoni MA; Molo Fde A
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(4):715-21. PubMed ID: 20657866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of subgingival depth of implant placement on the dimensional accuracy of the implant impression: an in vitro study.
    Lee H; Ercoli C; Funkenbusch PD; Feng C
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Feb; 99(2):107-13. PubMed ID: 18262011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Accuracy of three implant impression techniques with different impression materials and stones.
    Chang WG; Vahidi F; Bae KH; Lim BS
    Int J Prosthodont; 2012; 25(1):44-7. PubMed ID: 22259795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of the Accuracy of Different Transfer Impression Techniques for Osseointegrated Implants.
    Zen BM; Soares EF; Rodrigues MA; Luthi LF; Consani RL; Mesquita MF; Henriques GE
    J Oral Implantol; 2015 Dec; 41(6):662-7. PubMed ID: 25438007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effect of different screw-tightening techniques on the strain generated on an internal-connection implant superstructure. Part 2: Models created with a splinted impression technique.
    Choi JH
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(5):1016-23. PubMed ID: 22010085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Accuracy of different impression techniques for internal-connection implants.
    Lee YJ; Heo SJ; Koak JY; Kim SK
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(5):823-30. PubMed ID: 19865622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effect of casting and masticatory simulation on strain and misfit of implant-supported metal frameworks.
    Bhering CL; Marques Ida S; Takahashi JM; Barão VA; Consani RL; Mesquita MF
    Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl; 2016 May; 62():746-51. PubMed ID: 26952480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An in vitro comparison of the accuracy of implant impressions with coded healing abutments and different implant angulations.
    Al-Abdullah K; Zandparsa R; Finkelman M; Hirayama H
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Aug; 110(2):90-100. PubMed ID: 23929370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Influence of CAD/CAM on the fit accuracy of implant-supported zirconia and cobalt-chromium fixed dental prostheses.
    de França DG; Morais MH; das Neves FD; Barbosa GA
    J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Jan; 113(1):22-8. PubMed ID: 25277028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.