166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25511487)
1. [Metabolic activity measured by ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT in newly diagnosed patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma: correlation with immunophenotype].
Zhang J; Wang R; Fan Y; Fu Z; Zhang X; Liao X; Liu M; Kang L; Cui Y; Wang Y; Jiang Q
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2014 Sep; 94(33):2576-9. PubMed ID: 25511487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Correlation and Influencing Factors of SUVmax and Ki-67 in Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma].
Li J; Zhao M; Yuan L; Liu Y; Ma N
Zhongguo Shi Yan Xue Ye Xue Za Zhi; 2022 Feb; 30(1):136-140. PubMed ID: 35123616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Value of
Alobthani G; Romanov V; Isohashi K; Matsunaga K; Watabe T; Kato H; Tatsumi M; Shimosegawa E; Hatazawa J
Hell J Nucl Med; 2018; 21(1):7-14. PubMed ID: 29550841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Whole-body diffusion-weighted MRI and (18)F-FDG PET/CT can discriminate between different lymphoma subtypes.
Mosavi F; Wassberg C; Selling J; Molin D; Ahlström H
Clin Radiol; 2015 Nov; 70(11):1229-36. PubMed ID: 26208992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Correlations between maximum standardized uptake value measured via
Li H; Wang X; Zhang L; Yi X; Qiao Y; Jin Q
J Cancer Res Ther; 2019; 15(7):1581-1588. PubMed ID: 31939441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography/Magnetic Resonance in Lymphoma: Comparison With 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography and With the Addition of Magnetic Resonance Diffusion-Weighted Imaging.
Giraudo C; Raderer M; Karanikas G; Weber M; Kiesewetter B; Dolak W; Simonitsch-Klupp I; Mayerhoefer ME
Invest Radiol; 2016 Mar; 51(3):163-9. PubMed ID: 26784400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. SUV on dual-phase FDG PET/CT correlates with the Ki-67 proliferation index in patients with newly diagnosed non-Hodgkin lymphoma.
Chang CC; Cho SF; Chen YW; Tu HP; Lin CY; Chang CS
Clin Nucl Med; 2012 Aug; 37(8):e189-95. PubMed ID: 22785526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Correlation of ¹⁸F-FDG uptake with tumor-proliferating antigen Ki-67 expression in aggressive lymphoma].
Liang Y; Wu N; Fang Y; Huang WT; Zhang H; Zheng R; Zhang WJ; Liu Y; Li XM
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2013 May; 35(5):356-60. PubMed ID: 24054012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Metabolic activity measured by F-18 FDG PET in natural killer-cell lymphoma compared to aggressive B- and T-cell lymphomas.
Chan WK; Au WY; Wong CY; Liang R; Leung AY; Kwong YL; Khong PL
Clin Nucl Med; 2010 Aug; 35(8):571-5. PubMed ID: 20631501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Dual-time-point F-18 FDG PET/CT for evaluation in patients with malignant lymphoma.
Shinya T; Fujii S; Asakura S; Taniguchi T; Yoshio K; Alafate A; Sato S; Yoshino T; Kanazawa S
Ann Nucl Med; 2012 Oct; 26(8):616-21. PubMed ID: 22692457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. SUVmax in FDG-PET at the biopsy site correlates with the proliferation potential of tumor cells in non-Hodgkin lymphoma.
Watanabe R; Tomita N; Takeuchi K; Sakata S; Tateishi U; Tanaka M; Fujita H; Inayama Y; Ishigatsubo Y
Leuk Lymphoma; 2010 Feb; 51(2):279-83. PubMed ID: 20038236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Utility of FDG-PET in predicting the histology of relapsed or refractory lymphoma.
Wai SH; Lee ST; Cliff ERS; Bei M; Lee J; Hawkes EA; Chong G
Blood Adv; 2024 Feb; 8(3):736-745. PubMed ID: 38127277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Utilization of 18F-FDG PET/CT as a staging tool in patients with newly diagnosed lymphoma.
Cho SF; Chang CC; Liu YC; Chang CS; Hsiao HH; Liu TC; Huang CT; Lin SF
Kaohsiung J Med Sci; 2015 Mar; 31(3):130-7. PubMed ID: 25744235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Assessment of the prognostic capacity of pretreatment, interim, and post-therapy (18)F-FDG PET/CT in extranodal natural killer/T-cell lymphoma, nasal type.
Jiang C; Zhang X; Jiang M; Zou L; Su M; Kosik RO; Tian R
Ann Nucl Med; 2015 Jun; 29(5):442-51. PubMed ID: 25801633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Different roles of surveillance positron emission tomography according to the histologic subtype of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.
Kim YR; Kim SJ; Cheong JW; Kim Y; Jang JE; Cho H; Chung H; Min YH; Yang WI; Cho A; Kim JS
Korean J Intern Med; 2021 Mar; 36(Suppl 1):S245-S252. PubMed ID: 32550718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Hybrid FDG-PET/MR compared to FDG-PET/CT in adult lymphoma patients.
Atkinson W; Catana C; Abramson JS; Arabasz G; McDermott S; Catalano O; Muse V; Blake MA; Barnes J; Shelly M; Hochberg E; Rosen BR; Guimaraes AR
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2016 Jul; 41(7):1338-48. PubMed ID: 27315095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Comparison of ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT and large-scale DWI for evaluation of non-Hodgkin lymphoma bone marrow infiltration].
Tang R; Gui S; Li J; Zhang H; Lu B; Yang P; Fu D; Fu W; Li W; Cai L
Zhonghua Xue Ye Xue Za Zhi; 2014 Mar; 35(3):231-5. PubMed ID: 24666490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Prognostic value of SUVmax measured by pretreatment 18F-FDG PET/CT in patients with primary gastric lymphoma.
Hwang JP; Lim I; Byun BH; Kim BI; Choi CW; Lim SM
Nucl Med Commun; 2016 Dec; 37(12):1267-1272. PubMed ID: 27482643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Standardised uptake value of 18F-FDG on staging PET/CT in newly diagnosed patients with different subtypes of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.
Papajík T; Mysliveček M; Sedová Z; Buriánková E; Procházka V; Koranda P; Raida L; Kubová Z; Palová M; Kučerová L; Flodr P; Jarkovský J; Dušek L; Indrák K
Eur J Haematol; 2011 Jan; 86(1):32-7. PubMed ID: 20874822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Value of Pretherapeutic
Ding CY; Liu HY; Guo Z; Li TN
Zhongguo Shi Yan Xue Ye Xue Za Zhi; 2017 Apr; 25(2):438-443. PubMed ID: 28446289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
