BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

610 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25511967)

  • 1. Esthetic evaluation of the facial profile in rehabilitated adults with complete bilateral cleft lip and palate.
    Ferrari Júnior FM; Ayub PV; Capelozza Filho L; Pereira Lauris JR; Garib DG
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2015 Jan; 73(1):169.e1-6. PubMed ID: 25511967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Facial profile esthetics in operated children with bilateral cleft lip and palate.
    Lauris RCMC; Capelozza L; Calil LR; Lauris JRP; Janson G; Garib DG
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2017; 22(4):41-46. PubMed ID: 28902248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Facial attractiveness of patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate and of controls assessed by laypersons and professionals.
    Eichenberger M; Staudt CB; Pandis N; Gnoinski W; Eliades T
    Eur J Orthod; 2014 Jun; 36(3):284-9. PubMed ID: 23832974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Aesthetic outcome of cleft lip and palate treatment. Perceptions of patients, families, and health professionals compared to the general public.
    Gkantidis N; Papamanou DA; Christou P; Topouzelis N
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2013 Oct; 41(7):e105-10. PubMed ID: 23287059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Esthetic analysis of gingival components of smile and degree of satisfaction in individuals with cleft lip and palate.
    Esper LA; Sbrana MC; Ribeiro IW; de Siqueira EN; de Almeida AL
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2009 Jul; 46(4):381-7. PubMed ID: 19642765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Parent and child ratings of satisfaction with speech and facial appearance in Flemish pre-pubescent boys and girls with unilateral cleft lip and palate.
    Van Lierde KM; Dhaeseleer E; Luyten A; Van De Woestijne K; Vermeersch H; Roche N
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Feb; 41(2):192-9. PubMed ID: 22126855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Photometric analysis of esthetically pleasant and unpleasant facial profile.
    Fortes HN; Guimarães TC; Belo IM; da Matta EN
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2014; 19(2):66-75. PubMed ID: 24945516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of presurgical infant orthopedics on facial esthetics in complete bilateral cleft lip and palate.
    Ross RB; MacNamera MC
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 1994 Jan; 31(1):68-73. PubMed ID: 8130245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Appreciation of cleft lip and palate treatment outcome by professionals and laypeople.
    Papamanou DA; Gkantidis N; Topouzelis N; Christou P
    Eur J Orthod; 2012 Oct; 34(5):553-60. PubMed ID: 21771802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Oral health-related quality of life changes in standard, cleft, and surgery patients after orthodontic treatment.
    Antoun JS; Fowler PV; Jack HC; Farella M
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 Oct; 148(4):568-75. PubMed ID: 26432312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of facial pleasantness in patients with complete and unilateral cleft lip and palate rehabilitated and submitted to orofacial harmonization.
    Fangueiro DG; Garib DG; Conti ACCF; Largura L
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2024; 29(1):e2423115. PubMed ID: 38567921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Esthetic views on facial and dental appearance in young adults with treated bilateral cleft lip and palate (BCLP). A comparison between professional and non-professional evaluators.
    Chetpakdeechit W; Wahss J; Woo T; Hugander M; Mohlin B; Hagberg C
    Swed Dent J; 2011; 35(3):151-7. PubMed ID: 22135946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Three-dimensional morphologic nasal surface characteristics that predict the extremes of esthetics in patients with repaired cleft lip and palate.
    Russell KA; Milne AD; Varma D; Josephson K; Lee JM
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2011 Jan; 48(1):28-37. PubMed ID: 20184427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Correlation between facial morphology and esthetics in patients with repaired complete unilateral cleft lip and palate.
    Russell KA; Orthod D; Tompson B; Orthod D; Paedo D
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2009 May; 46(3):319-25. PubMed ID: 19642746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of esthetic, functional, and quality-of-life outcome in adult cleft lip and palate patients.
    Sinko K; Jagsch R; Prechtl V; Watzinger F; Hollmann K; Baumann A
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2005 Jul; 42(4):355-61. PubMed ID: 16001915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An appraisal of three methods of rating facial deformity in patients with repaired complete unilateral cleft lip and palate.
    Al-Omari I; Millett DT; Ayoub A; Bock M; Ray A; Dunaway D; Crampin L
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2003 Sep; 40(5):530-7. PubMed ID: 12943433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Validity of subjective evaluations for the assessment of lip scarring and impairment.
    Ritter K; Trotman CA; Phillips C
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2002 Nov; 39(6):587-96. PubMed ID: 12401105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Interdisciplinary treatment of an adult with bilateral cleft lip and palate with missing premaxilla: The prosthodontic perspective.
    Abreu A; Levy-Bercowski D; Yu J; Salgueiro M; Kalathingal S; Ferreira Susin L; Baker P
    J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Oct; 114(4):609-13. PubMed ID: 26119020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The point of view of the patient: personal account from a patient who has finished the cleft lip and palate programme.
    Kwakkenbos L
    B-ENT; 2006; 2 Suppl 4():27-8. PubMed ID: 17366843
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A questionnaire survey of attitudes and concerns of three professional groups involved in the cleft palate team.
    Noar JH
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 1992 Jan; 29(1):92-5. PubMed ID: 1547256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 31.