These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

233 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25511994)

  • 1. The interplay between referential processing and local syntactic/semantic processing: ERPs to written Chinese discourse.
    Yu J; Zhang Y; Boland JE; Cai L
    Brain Res; 2015 Feb; 1597():139-58. PubMed ID: 25511994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The interplay between semantic and referential aspects of anaphoric noun phrase resolution: Evidence from ERPs.
    Nieuwland MS; Van Berkum JJ
    Brain Lang; 2008 Aug; 106(2):119-31. PubMed ID: 18556057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Individual differences in the processing of referential dependencies: Evidence from event-related potentials.
    Fiorentino R; Covey L; Gabriele A
    Neurosci Lett; 2018 Apr; 673():79-84. PubMed ID: 29444445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Interplay between syntax and semantics during sentence comprehension: ERP effects of combining syntactic and semantic violations.
    Hagoort P
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2003 Aug; 15(6):883-99. PubMed ID: 14511541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Event-related brain potentials reflect discourse-referential ambiguity in spoken language comprehension.
    van Berkum JJ; Brown CM; Hagoort P; Zwitserlood P
    Psychophysiology; 2003 Mar; 40(2):235-48. PubMed ID: 12820864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Semantics does not need a processing license from syntax in reading Chinese.
    Zhang Y; Yu J; Boland JE
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 May; 36(3):765-81. PubMed ID: 20438271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Do discourse global coherence and cumulated information impact on sentence syntactic processing? An event-related brain potentials study.
    Hernández-Gutiérrez D; Jiménez-Ortega L; Fondevila S; Casado P; Muñoz F; Martín-Loeches M
    Brain Res; 2016 Jan; 1630():109-19. PubMed ID: 26569131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Syntactic and semantic processing of Chinese middle sentences: evidence from event-related potentials.
    Zeng T; Mao W; Lu Q
    Neuroreport; 2016 May; 27(8):568-73. PubMed ID: 27028353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Referential processing in the human brain: An Event-Related Potential (ERP) study.
    Barkley C; Kluender R; Kutas M
    Brain Res; 2015 Dec; 1629():143-59. PubMed ID: 26456801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. When politeness processing encounters failed syntactic/semantic processing.
    Ji L
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2021 Sep; 219():103391. PubMed ID: 34412023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Multiple semantic processes at different levels of syntactic hierarchy: does the higher-level process proceed in face of a lower-level failure?
    Jiang X; Zhou X
    Neuropsychologia; 2012 Jul; 50(8):1918-28. PubMed ID: 22561886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Semantics prevalence over syntax during sentence processing: a brain potential study of noun-adjective agreement in Spanish.
    Martín-Loeches M; Nigbur R; Casado P; Hohlfeld A; Sommer W
    Brain Res; 2006 Jun; 1093(1):178-89. PubMed ID: 16678138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The processing of number and gender agreement in Spanish: an event-related potential investigation of the effects of structural distance.
    Alemán Bañón J; Fiorentino R; Gabriele A
    Brain Res; 2012 May; 1456():49-63. PubMed ID: 22520436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Neural mechanisms of language comprehension: challenges to syntax.
    Kuperberg GR
    Brain Res; 2007 May; 1146():23-49. PubMed ID: 17400197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Syntactic and referential processes in second-language learners: event-related brain potential evidence.
    Isel F
    Neuroreport; 2007 Dec; 18(18):1885-9. PubMed ID: 18007180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. How and when prosodic boundaries influence syntactic parsing under different discourse contexts: an ERP study.
    Li XQ; Yang YF; Lu Y
    Biol Psychol; 2010 Mar; 83(3):250-9. PubMed ID: 20083152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Structural syntactic prediction measured with ELAN: evidence from ERPs.
    Fonteneau E
    Neurosci Lett; 2013 Feb; 534():211-6. PubMed ID: 23262082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Are semantic and syntactic cues inducing the same processes in the identification of word order?
    Casado P; Martín-Loeches M; Muñoz F; Fernández-Frías C
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Aug; 24(3):526-43. PubMed ID: 16099364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Event-related brain potentials index cue-based retrieval interference during sentence comprehension.
    Martin AE; Nieuwland MS; Carreiras M
    Neuroimage; 2012 Jan; 59(2):1859-69. PubMed ID: 21925613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. On sense and reference: examining the functional neuroanatomy of referential processing.
    Nieuwland MS; Petersson KM; Van Berkum JJ
    Neuroimage; 2007 Sep; 37(3):993-1004. PubMed ID: 17611124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.