587 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25512161)
1. Surgical margin length and location affect recurrence rates after robotic prostatectomy.
Dev HS; Wiklund P; Patel V; Parashar D; Palmer K; Nyberg T; Skarecky D; Neal DE; Ahlering T; Sooriakumaran P
Urol Oncol; 2015 Mar; 33(3):109.e7-13. PubMed ID: 25512161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The impact of length and location of positive margins in predicting biochemical recurrence after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy with a minimum follow-up of 5 years.
Sooriakumaran P; Ploumidis A; Nyberg T; Olsson M; Akre O; Haendler L; Egevad L; Nilsson A; Carlsson S; Jonsson M; Adding C; Hosseini A; Steineck G; Wiklund P
BJU Int; 2015 Jan; 115(1):106-13. PubMed ID: 24119144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Short (≤ 1 mm) positive surgical margin and risk of biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy.
Shikanov S; Marchetti P; Desai V; Razmaria A; Antic T; Al-Ahmadie H; Zagaja G; Eggener S; Brendler C; Shalhav A
BJU Int; 2013 Apr; 111(4):559-63. PubMed ID: 22759270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Length of positive surgical margin after radical prostatectomy as a predictor of biochemical recurrence.
Shikanov S; Song J; Royce C; Al-Ahmadie H; Zorn K; Steinberg G; Zagaja G; Shalhav A; Eggener S
J Urol; 2009 Jul; 182(1):139-44. PubMed ID: 19450829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Risk factors for biochemical recurrence following radical perineal prostatectomy in a large contemporary series: a detailed assessment of margin extent and location.
Sammon JD; Trinh QD; Sukumar S; Ravi P; Friedman A; Sun M; Schmitges J; Jeldres C; Jeong W; Mander N; Peabody JO; Karakiewicz PI; Harris M
Urol Oncol; 2013 Nov; 31(8):1470-6. PubMed ID: 22534086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Favorable risk factors in patients with positive surgical margin after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.
Ha YS; Kang DI; Kim JH; Joung JY; Yu J; Parihar JS; Salmasi AH; Horie S; Kim WJ; Yi Kim I
Can J Urol; 2014 Jun; 21(3):7290-7. PubMed ID: 24978359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. High Gleason grade carcinoma at a positive surgical margin predicts biochemical failure after radical prostatectomy and may guide adjuvant radiotherapy.
Savdie R; Horvath LG; Benito RP; Rasiah KK; Haynes AM; Chatfield M; Stricker PD; Turner JJ; Delprado W; Henshall SM; Sutherland RL; Kench JG
BJU Int; 2012 Jun; 109(12):1794-800. PubMed ID: 21992536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Superior Biochemical Recurrence and Long-term Quality-of-life Outcomes Are Achievable with Robotic Radical Prostatectomy After a Long Learning Curve-Updated Analysis of a Prospective Single-surgeon Cohort of 2206 Consecutive Cases.
Thompson JE; Egger S; Böhm M; Siriwardana AR; Haynes AM; Matthews J; Scheltema MJ; Stricker PD
Eur Urol; 2018 May; 73(5):664-671. PubMed ID: 29273404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Length of site-specific positive surgical margins as a risk factor for biochemical recurrence following radical prostatectomy.
Hsu M; Chang SL; Ferrari M; Nolley R; Presti JC; Brooks JD
Int J Urol; 2011 Apr; 18(4):272-9. PubMed ID: 21342296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Impact of positive surgical margins on prostate-specific antigen failure after radical prostatectomy in adjuvant treatment-naïve patients.
Ploussard G; Agamy MA; Alenda O; Allory Y; Mouracade P; Vordos D; Hoznek A; Abbou CC; de la Taille A; Salomon L
BJU Int; 2011 Jun; 107(11):1748-54. PubMed ID: 20883488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Close surgical margins after radical prostatectomy mimic biochemical recurrence rates of positive margins.
Whalen MJ; Shapiro EY; Rothberg MB; Turk AT; Woldu SL; Roy Choudhury A; Patel T; Badani KK
Urol Oncol; 2015 Nov; 33(11):494.e9-494.e14. PubMed ID: 26259665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Risk factors for biochemical recurrence after robotic assisted radical prostatectomy: a single surgeon experience.
Tanimoto R; Fashola Y; Scotland KB; Calvaresi AE; Gomella LG; Trabulsi EJ; Lallas CD
BMC Urol; 2015 Apr; 15():27. PubMed ID: 25879548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Location of positive surgical margin and its association with biochemical recurrence rate do not differ significantly in four different types of radical prostatectomy.
Suh YS; Jang HJ; Song W; Lee HW; Kim HS; Jeon HG; Jeong BC; Seo SI; Jeon SS; Choi HY; Lee HM
Korean J Urol; 2014 Dec; 55(12):802-7. PubMed ID: 25512814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Biochemical recurrence-free survival after robotic-assisted laparoscopic vs open radical prostatectomy for intermediate- and high-risk prostate cancer.
Ritch CR; You C; May AT; Herrell SD; Clark PE; Penson DF; Chang SS; Cookson MS; Smith JA; Barocas DA
Urology; 2014 Jun; 83(6):1309-15. PubMed ID: 24746665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A comparison of the incidence and location of positive surgical margins in robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and open retropubic radical prostatectomy.
Smith JA; Chan RC; Chang SS; Herrell SD; Clark PE; Baumgartner R; Cookson MS
J Urol; 2007 Dec; 178(6):2385-9; discussion 2389-90. PubMed ID: 17936849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Positive surgical margin in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: correlation with pathology findings and risk of biochemical recurrence.
Jo JK; Hong SK; Byun SS; Zargar H; Autorino R; Lee SE
Minerva Urol Nefrol; 2017 Oct; 69(5):493-500. PubMed ID: 28376606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Linear extent of positive surgical margin impacts biochemical recurrence after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in a high-volume center.
Porcaro AB; Tafuri A; Sebben M; Amigoni N; Shakir A; Corsi P; Processali T; Pirozzi M; Rizzetto R; Bernasconi R; Cerrato C; Tiso L; Migliorini F; Novella G; Brunelli M; De Marco V; Siracusano S; Artibani W
J Robot Surg; 2020 Aug; 14(4):663-675. PubMed ID: 31893344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Positive surgical margins and biochemical recurrence following minimally-invasive radical prostatectomy - An analysis of outcomes from a UK tertiary referral centre.
Sachdeva A; Veeratterapillay R; Voysey A; Kelly K; Johnson MI; Aning J; Soomro NA
BMC Urol; 2017 Oct; 17(1):91. PubMed ID: 28969608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Learning curve of minimally invasive radical prostatectomy: Comprehensive evaluation and cumulative summation analysis of oncological outcomes.
Sivaraman A; Sanchez-Salas R; Prapotnich D; Yu K; Olivier F; Secin FP; Barret E; Galiano M; Rozet F; Cathelineau X
Urol Oncol; 2017 Apr; 35(4):149.e1-149.e6. PubMed ID: 28117215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The impact of the extent and location of positive surgical margins on the risk of biochemical recurrence following radical prostatectomy in men with Gleason 7 prostate cancers.
Matti B; Reeves F; Prouse M; Zargar-Shoshtari K
Prostate; 2021 Dec; 81(16):1428-1434. PubMed ID: 34570379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
