345 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25514349)
1. Role of a double docking to improve lymph node dissection: when robotically assisted laparoscopy for para-aortic lymphadenectomy is associated to a pelvic procedure.
Franké O; Narducci F; Chereau-Ewald E; Orsoni M; Jauffret C; Leblanc E; Houvenaeghel G; Lambaudie E
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2015 Feb; 25(2):331-6. PubMed ID: 25514349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Robot-assisted laparoscopic transperitoneal infrarenal lymphadenectomy in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer by single docking: Do we need a backup procedure?
Gucer F; Misirlioglu S; Ceydeli N; Taskiran C
J Robot Surg; 2018 Mar; 12(1):49-58. PubMed ID: 28255734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Robotically assisted para-aortic lymphadenectomy: surgical results: a cohort study of 487 patients.
Hudry D; Ahmad S; Zanagnolo V; Narducci F; Fastrez M; Ponce J; Tucher E; Lécuru F; Conri V; Leguevaque P; Goffin F; Holloway RW; Lambaudie E;
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2015 Mar; 25(3):504-11. PubMed ID: 25628104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Robotic Transperitoneal Infrarenal Para-Aortic Lymphadenectomy With Double Docking: Technique, Learning Curve, and Perioperative Outcomes.
Ponce J; Barahona M; Pla MJ; Rovira J; Garcia-Tejedor A; Gil-Ibanez B; Gaspar HM; Sabria E; Bartolomé C; Marti L
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2016; 23(4):622-7. PubMed ID: 26898894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Para-aortic lymph node surgical staging in locally-advanced cervical cancer: comparison between robotic versus conventional laparoscopy.
Loverix L; Salihi RR; Van Nieuwenhuysen E; Concin N; Han S; van Gorp T; Vergote I
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2020 Apr; 30(4):466-472. PubMed ID: 32079714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Single-port Robotic Pelvic Bulky Lymph Node Resection: A Case Report.
Gungor M; Takmaz O; Afsar S; Ozbasli E; Gundogan S
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2016; 23(7):1030-1031. PubMed ID: 27311875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Robotic high para-aortic lymph node dissection with high port placement using same port for pelvic surgery in gynecologic cancer patients.
Kim TJ; Yoon G; Lee YY; Choi CH; Lee JW; Bae DS; Kim BG
J Gynecol Oncol; 2015 Jul; 26(3):222-6. PubMed ID: 26197858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Indications and techniques for robotic pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy in gynecologic oncology.
Wisner KP; Gupta S; Ahmad S; Holloway RW
J Surg Oncol; 2015 Dec; 112(7):782-9. PubMed ID: 26288990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Extraperitoneal Para-Aortic Lymphadenectomy by Robot-Assisted Laparoscopy.
da Costa AG; Borghesi Y; Hudry D; Faes J; Bresson L; Narducci F; Leblanc E
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2018; 25(5):861-866. PubMed ID: 29337211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Mini-laparoscopic versus robotic radical hysterectomy plus systematic pelvic lymphadenectomy in early cervical cancer patients. A multi-institutional study.
Corrado G; Fanfani F; Ghezzi F; Fagotti A; Uccella S; Mancini E; Sperduti I; Stevenazzi G; Scambia G; Vizza E
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2015 Jan; 41(1):136-41. PubMed ID: 25468748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of robotic-assisted versus laparoscopy for transperitoneal infrarenal para-aortic lymphadenectomy in patients with endometrial cancer.
Lee HJ; Lee YH; Chong GO; Hong DG; Lee YS
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2018 Mar; 44(3):547-555. PubMed ID: 29239059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of perioperative outcomes and cost between robotic-assisted and conventional laparoscopy for transperitoneal infrarenal para-aortic lymphadenectomy (TIPAL).
Coronado PJ; Fasero M; Magrina JF; Herraiz MA; Vidart JA
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2014; 21(4):674-81. PubMed ID: 24486680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Robot-assisted Laparoscopic Retroperitoneal Lymph Node Dissection for Testicular Cancer: Evolution of the Technique.
Stepanian S; Patel M; Porter J
Eur Urol; 2016 Oct; 70(4):661-667. PubMed ID: 27068395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Robotically assisted laparoscopy for paraaortic lymphadenectomy: technical description and results of an initial experience.
Lambaudie E; Narducci F; Leblanc E; Bannier M; Jauffret C; Cannone F; Houvenaeghel G
Surg Endosc; 2012 Sep; 26(9):2430-5. PubMed ID: 22407151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The safety and feasibility of robotic-assisted lymph node staging in early-stage ovarian cancer.
Brown JV; Mendivil AA; Abaid LN; Rettenmaier MA; Micha JP; Wabe MA; Goldstein BH
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2014 Oct; 24(8):1493-8. PubMed ID: 25078341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparing Open Radical Cystectomy and Robot-assisted Laparoscopic Radical Cystectomy: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
Bochner BH; Dalbagni G; Sjoberg DD; Silberstein J; Keren Paz GE; Donat SM; Coleman JA; Mathew S; Vickers A; Schnorr GC; Feuerstein MA; Rapkin B; Parra RO; Herr HW; Laudone VP
Eur Urol; 2015 Jun; 67(6):1042-1050. PubMed ID: 25496767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Single-port laparoscopic extraperitoneal para-aortic lymphadenectomy.
Iacoponi S; De Santiago J; Diestro MD; Hernandez A; Zapardiel I
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2013 Nov; 23(9):1712-6. PubMed ID: 24172105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Improving Double Docking for Robot-assisted Para-aortic Lymphadenectomy in Endometrial Cancer Staging: Technique and Surgical Outcomes.
Ekdahl L; Salehi S; Falconer H
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2016; 23(5):818-24. PubMed ID: 27063093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Robotic extraperitoneal paraaortic lymphadenectomy in gynecological cancers: feasibility, safety, and short-term outcomes of isolated and combined procedures.
Bats AS; Mimouni M; Bensaïd C; Seror J; Douay-Hauser N; Nos C; Lécuru F
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2014 Oct; 24(8):1486-92. PubMed ID: 25191875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Extraperitoneal Robotic-Assisted Para-Aortic Lymphadenectomy in Gynecologic Cancer Staging: Current Evidence.
Bogani G; Ditto A; Martinelli F; Signorelli M; Chiappa V; Sabatucci I; Scaffa C; Lorusso D; Raspagliesi F
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2016; 23(4):489-96. PubMed ID: 26802906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
