245 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25515229)
1. An in silico parametric model of vertebrae trabecular bone based on density and microstructural parameters to assess risk of fracture in osteoporosis.
Amjadi Kashani MR; Nikkhoo M; Khalaf K; Firoozbakhsh K; Arjmand N; Razmjoo A; Parnianpour M
Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2014 Dec; 228(12):1281-95. PubMed ID: 25515229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A method for patient-specific evaluation of vertebral cancellous bone strength: in vitro validation.
Diamant I; Shahar R; Masharawi Y; Gefen A
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2007 Mar; 22(3):282-91. PubMed ID: 17134802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Vertebral osteoporosis and trabecular bone quality.
McDonnell P; McHugh PE; O'Mahoney D
Ann Biomed Eng; 2007 Feb; 35(2):170-89. PubMed ID: 17171508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. QCT-based finite element models predict human vertebral strength in vitro significantly better than simulated DEXA.
Dall'Ara E; Pahr D; Varga P; Kainberger F; Zysset P
Osteoporos Int; 2012 Feb; 23(2):563-72. PubMed ID: 21344244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. In vivo assessment of architecture and micro-finite element analysis derived indices of mechanical properties of trabecular bone in the radius.
Newitt DC; Majumdar S; van Rietbergen B; von Ingersleben G; Harris ST; Genant HK; Chesnut C; Garnero P; MacDonald B
Osteoporos Int; 2002 Jan; 13(1):6-17. PubMed ID: 11878456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Structural determinants of vertebral fracture risk.
Melton LJ; Riggs BL; Keaveny TM; Achenbach SJ; Hoffmann PF; Camp JJ; Rouleau PA; Bouxsein ML; Amin S; Atkinson EJ; Robb RA; Khosla S
J Bone Miner Res; 2007 Dec; 22(12):1885-92. PubMed ID: 17680721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Density-Dependent Material and Failure Criteria Equations Highly Affect the Accuracy and Precision of QCT/FEA-Based Predictions of Osteoporotic Vertebral Fracture Properties.
Prado M; Rezaei A; Giambini H
Ann Biomed Eng; 2021 Feb; 49(2):663-672. PubMed ID: 32820381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Relationship between structural parameters, bone mineral density and fracture load in lumbar vertebrae, based on high-resolution computed tomography, quantitative computed tomography and compression tests.
Haidekker MA; Andresen R; Werner HJ
Osteoporos Int; 1999; 9(5):433-40. PubMed ID: 10550463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Finite element modeling of trabecular bone damage.
Kosmopoulos V; Keller TS
Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2003 Jun; 6(3):209-16. PubMed ID: 12888432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Osteoporosis changes the amount of vertebral trabecular bone at risk of fracture but not the vertebral load distribution.
Homminga J; Weinans H; Gowin W; Felsenberg D; Huiskes R
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2001 Jul; 26(14):1555-61. PubMed ID: 11462085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Burst fracture in the metastatically involved spine: development, validation, and parametric analysis of a three-dimensional poroelastic finite-element model.
Whyne CM; Hu SS; Lotz JC
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Apr; 28(7):652-60. PubMed ID: 12671351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The correlation between the SOS in trabecular bone and stiffness and density studied by finite-element analysis.
Goossens L; Vanderoost J; Jaecques S; Boonen S; D'hooge J; Lauriks W; Van der Perre G
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2008; 55(6):1234-42. PubMed ID: 18599411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Determination of vertebral and femoral trabecular morphology and stiffness using a flat-panel C-arm-based CT approach.
Mulder L; van Rietbergen B; Noordhoek NJ; Ito K
Bone; 2012 Jan; 50(1):200-8. PubMed ID: 22057082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Osteoporosis imaging: effects of bone preservation on MDCT-based trabecular bone microstructure parameters and finite element models.
Baum T; Grande Garcia E; Burgkart R; Gordijenko O; Liebl H; Jungmann PM; Gruber M; Zahel T; Rummeny EJ; Waldt S; Bauer JS
BMC Med Imaging; 2015 Jun; 15():22. PubMed ID: 26113362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Locally measured microstructural parameters are better associated with vertebral strength than whole bone density.
Hazrati Marangalou J; Eckstein F; Kuhn V; Ito K; Cataldi M; Taddei F; van Rietbergen B
Osteoporos Int; 2014 Apr; 25(4):1285-96. PubMed ID: 24306231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Relative strength of thoracic vertebrae in axial compression versus flexion.
Buckley JM; Kuo CC; Cheng LC; Loo K; Motherway J; Slyfield C; Deviren V; Ames C
Spine J; 2009 Jun; 9(6):478-85. PubMed ID: 19364678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A mechanical model for predicting the probability of osteoporotic hip fractures based in DXA measurements and finite element simulation.
López E; Ibarz E; Herrera A; Mateo J; Lobo-Escolar A; Puértolas S; Gracia L
Biomed Eng Online; 2012 Nov; 11():84. PubMed ID: 23151049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The biomechanical effect of vertebroplasty on the adjacent vertebral body: a finite element study.
Wilcox RK
Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2006 May; 220(4):565-72. PubMed ID: 16808072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Biomechanical comparison of mono-segment transpedicular fixation with short-segment fixation for treatment of thoracolumbar fractures: a finite element analysis.
Xu G; Fu X; Du C; Ma J; Li Z; Tian P; Zhang T; Ma X
Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2014 Oct; 228(10):1005-13. PubMed ID: 25267283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A three-scale finite element investigation into the effects of tissue mineralisation and lamellar organisation in human cortical and trabecular bone.
Vaughan TJ; McCarthy CT; McNamara LM
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2012 Aug; 12():50-62. PubMed ID: 22659366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
