253 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25515591)
1. Inter-response-time reinforcement and relative reinforcer frequency control choice.
Tanno T; Silberberg A
Learn Behav; 2015 Mar; 43(1):54-71. PubMed ID: 25515591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Concurrent VR VI schedules: primacy of molar control of preference and molecular control of response rates.
Tanno T; Silberberg A; Sakagami T
Learn Behav; 2010 Nov; 38(4):382-93. PubMed ID: 21048229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Briefly delayed reinforcement effects on variable-ratio and yoked-interval schedule performance.
Holtyn AF; Lattal KA
J Exp Anal Behav; 2013 Sep; 100(2):198-210. PubMed ID: 23900853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Interlocking schedules: the relationship between response and time requirements.
Rider DP
J Exp Anal Behav; 1977 Jul; 28(1):41-6. PubMed ID: 903743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Schedules of reinforcement as determinants of human causality judgments and response rates.
Reed P
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2001 Jul; 27(3):187-95. PubMed ID: 11497319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Response rate and sensitivity to the molar feedback function relating response and reinforcement rate on VI+ schedules of reinforcement.
Reed P
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2007 Oct; 33(4):428-39. PubMed ID: 17924790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Gestational exposure to methylmercury retards choice in transition in aging rats.
Newland MC; Reile PA; Langston JL
Neurotoxicol Teratol; 2004; 26(2):179-94. PubMed ID: 15019952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Concurrent schedules of wheel-running reinforcement: choice between different durations of opportunity to run in rats.
Belke TW
Learn Behav; 2006 Feb; 34(1):61-70. PubMed ID: 16786885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Sensitivity to relative reinforcer rate in concurrent schedules: independence from relative and absolute reinforcer duration.
McLean AP; Blampied NM
J Exp Anal Behav; 2001 Jan; 75(1):25-42. PubMed ID: 11256865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Rats' performance on variable-interval schedules with a linear feedback loop between response rate and reinforcement rate.
Reed P; Hildebrandt T; DeJongh J; Soh M
J Exp Anal Behav; 2003 Mar; 79(2):157-73. PubMed ID: 12822684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Pausing as an operant: choice and discriminated responding.
Craig AR; Lattal KA; Hall EG
J Exp Anal Behav; 2014 Mar; 101(2):230-45. PubMed ID: 24436113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Response suppression on DRL by rats with septal damage.
Ellen P; Mokohon L; Richardson WK
J Comp Physiol Psychol; 1978 Jun; 92(3):511-21. PubMed ID: 681566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Response-bout analysis of interresponse times in variable-ratio and variable-interval schedules.
Tanno T
Behav Processes; 2016 Nov; 132():12-21. PubMed ID: 27619956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effects of reinforcer magnitude on responding under differential-reinforcement-of-low-rate schedules of rats and pigeons.
Doughty AH; Richards JB
J Exp Anal Behav; 2002 Jul; 78(1):17-30. PubMed ID: 12144310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Free-operant performance on variable interval schedules with a linear feedback loop: no evidence for molar sensitivities in rats.
Reed P; Soh M; Hildebrandt T; DeJongh J; Shek WY
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2000 Oct; 26(4):416-27. PubMed ID: 11056882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. On the primacy of molecular processes in determining response rates under variable-ratio and variable-interval schedules.
Tanno T; Sakagami T
J Exp Anal Behav; 2008 Jan; 89(1):5-14. PubMed ID: 18338672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Sensitivity to pre- and post-reinforcer delays in self-control choice.
Yamaguchi T; Saeki D; Ito M
Behav Processes; 2015 Dec; 121():8-12. PubMed ID: 26456039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effects of delayed reinforcers on the behavior of an animal model of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD).
Johansen EB; Sagvolden T; Kvande G
Behav Brain Res; 2005 Jul; 162(1):47-61. PubMed ID: 15922066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of required response force on rats' performance on a VI+ schedule of reinforcement.
Reed P
Learn Behav; 2006 Nov; 34(4):379-86. PubMed ID: 17330529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Arousal, changeover responses, and preference in concurrent schedules.
McDevitt MA; Williams BA
J Exp Anal Behav; 2003 Nov; 80(3):261-72. PubMed ID: 14964707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
