These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25515827)
1. We need more research on causes and consequences, as well as on solutions. Fanelli D Addiction; 2015 Jan; 110(1):11-3. PubMed ID: 25515827 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Ten reasons why journals must review manuscripts before results are known. Chambers CD Addiction; 2015 Jan; 110(1):10-1. PubMed ID: 25515826 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Mistakes and misconduct in the research literature: retractions just the tip of the iceberg. Poulton A Med J Aust; 2007 Mar; 186(6):323-4. PubMed ID: 17371220 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Editorial: Why Some Authors Make Bad Choices--Peer Review for Hire and Other Sad Stories. Beadling L; Leopold SS Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Aug; 473(8):2441-3. PubMed ID: 25991436 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Use of impact factors. Hemmingsson A; Edgren J; Mygind T; Skjennald A Lancet; 2002 Jan; 359(9301):173. PubMed ID: 11809301 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Preventing the ends from justifying the means: withholding results to address publication bias in peer-review. Button KS; Bal L; Clark A; Shipley T BMC Psychol; 2016 Dec; 4(1):59. PubMed ID: 27903302 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Is peer review in crisis? Mulligan A Oral Oncol; 2005 Feb; 41(2):135-41. PubMed ID: 15695114 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Prevention of false positive findings in observational studies: registration will not work but replication might. de Jonge P; Conradi HJ; Thombs BD; Rosmalen JG; Burger H; Ormel J J Epidemiol Community Health; 2011 Feb; 65(2):95-6. PubMed ID: 21113013 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Suppression, bias, and selection in science: the case of cancer research. Hess DJ Account Res; 1999; 6(4):245-57. PubMed ID: 11657839 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Publication ethics and scientific misconduct. Peh WC; Ng KH Singapore Med J; 2010 Dec; 51(12):908-12. PubMed ID: 21221494 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Scientific misconduct. Reviewer's déjà vu, French science sleuthing uncover plagiarized papers. Balter M Science; 2012 Mar; 335(6073):1157-8. PubMed ID: 22403360 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Reproducibility of science: Fraud, impact factors and carelessness. Eisner DA J Mol Cell Cardiol; 2018 Jan; 114():364-368. PubMed ID: 29079076 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]