These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25515827)

  • 1. We need more research on causes and consequences, as well as on solutions.
    Fanelli D
    Addiction; 2015 Jan; 110(1):11-3. PubMed ID: 25515827
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Ten reasons why journals must review manuscripts before results are known.
    Chambers CD
    Addiction; 2015 Jan; 110(1):10-1. PubMed ID: 25515826
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Mistakes and misconduct in the research literature: retractions just the tip of the iceberg.
    Poulton A
    Med J Aust; 2007 Mar; 186(6):323-4. PubMed ID: 17371220
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Handling the fragile vase of scientific practices.
    Ioannidis JP
    Addiction; 2015 Jan; 110(1):9-10. PubMed ID: 25515825
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Science publishing: The trouble with retractions.
    Van Noorden R
    Nature; 2011 Oct; 478(7367):26-8. PubMed ID: 21979026
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Significance chasing in research practice: causes, consequences and possible solutions.
    Ware JJ; Munafò MR
    Addiction; 2015 Jan; 110(1):4-8. PubMed ID: 25040652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Meet this super-spotter of duplicated images in science papers.
    Shen H
    Nature; 2020 May; 581(7807):132-136. PubMed ID: 32405024
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Retracted publications in the drug literature.
    Samp JC; Schumock GT; Pickard AS
    Pharmacotherapy; 2012 Jul; 32(7):586-95. PubMed ID: 22581659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Behind the scenes of scientific articles: defining categories of fraud and regulating cases].
    Pontille D; Torny D
    Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique; 2012 Aug; 60(4):247-53. PubMed ID: 22819062
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A painful remedy.
    Nature; 2010 Nov; 468(7320):6. PubMed ID: 21048718
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Editorial: Why Some Authors Make Bad Choices--Peer Review for Hire and Other Sad Stories.
    Beadling L; Leopold SS
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Aug; 473(8):2441-3. PubMed ID: 25991436
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Use of impact factors.
    Hemmingsson A; Edgren J; Mygind T; Skjennald A
    Lancet; 2002 Jan; 359(9301):173. PubMed ID: 11809301
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Ethical dilemmas in journal publication.
    Babalola O; Grant-Kels JM; Parish LC
    Clin Dermatol; 2012; 30(2):231-6. PubMed ID: 22330669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Preventing the ends from justifying the means: withholding results to address publication bias in peer-review.
    Button KS; Bal L; Clark A; Shipley T
    BMC Psychol; 2016 Dec; 4(1):59. PubMed ID: 27903302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Is peer review in crisis?
    Mulligan A
    Oral Oncol; 2005 Feb; 41(2):135-41. PubMed ID: 15695114
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Prevention of false positive findings in observational studies: registration will not work but replication might.
    de Jonge P; Conradi HJ; Thombs BD; Rosmalen JG; Burger H; Ormel J
    J Epidemiol Community Health; 2011 Feb; 65(2):95-6. PubMed ID: 21113013
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Suppression, bias, and selection in science: the case of cancer research.
    Hess DJ
    Account Res; 1999; 6(4):245-57. PubMed ID: 11657839
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Publication ethics and scientific misconduct.
    Peh WC; Ng KH
    Singapore Med J; 2010 Dec; 51(12):908-12. PubMed ID: 21221494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Scientific misconduct. Reviewer's déjà vu, French science sleuthing uncover plagiarized papers.
    Balter M
    Science; 2012 Mar; 335(6073):1157-8. PubMed ID: 22403360
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Reproducibility of science: Fraud, impact factors and carelessness.
    Eisner DA
    J Mol Cell Cardiol; 2018 Jan; 114():364-368. PubMed ID: 29079076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.