These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

224 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25516201)

  • 21. Predictive value and discriminant capacity of cepstral- and spectral-based measures during continuous speech.
    Lowell SY; Colton RH; Kelley RT; Mizia SA
    J Voice; 2013 Jul; 27(4):393-400. PubMed ID: 23684735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Developing auditory-perceptual judgment reliability in otolaryngology residents.
    Misono S; Merati AL; Eadie TL
    J Voice; 2012 May; 26(3):358-64. PubMed ID: 22019147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Assessment of Grade of Dysphonia and Correlation With Quality of Life Protocol.
    Spina AL; Crespo AN
    J Voice; 2017 Mar; 31(2):243.e21-243.e26. PubMed ID: 27658338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Validation of the Cepstral Spectral Index of Dysphonia (CSID) as a Screening Tool for Voice Disorders: Development of Clinical Cutoff Scores.
    Awan SN; Roy N; Zhang D; Cohen SM
    J Voice; 2016 Mar; 30(2):130-44. PubMed ID: 26361215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The effect of visual feedback and training in auditory-perceptual judgment of voice quality.
    Barsties B; Beers M; Ten Cate L; Van Ballegooijen K; Braam L; De Groot M; Van Der Kant M; Kruitwagen C; Maryn Y
    Logoped Phoniatr Vocol; 2017 Apr; 42(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 26525078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Clinical versus laboratory ratings of voice using the CAPE-V.
    Solomon NP; Helou LB; Stojadinovic A
    J Voice; 2011 Jan; 25(1):e7-14. PubMed ID: 20430573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Toward a more quantitative measure to assess severity of dysphonia: preliminary observations.
    Schaeffer N; Sidavi A
    J Voice; 2010 Sep; 24(5):556-63. PubMed ID: 19616403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Effect of Training With Anchors on Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Dysphonia in Speech-Language Pathology Students.
    Wong DW; Chan RW; Wu CH
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2021 Apr; 64(4):1136-1156. PubMed ID: 33769849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Use of cepstral analysis for differentiating dysphonic from normal voices in children.
    Esen Aydinli F; Özcebe E; İncebay Ö
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2019 Jan; 116():107-113. PubMed ID: 30554679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Does the presence or location of graphic markers affect untrained listeners' ratings of severity of dysphonia?
    Nagle KF; Helou LB; Solomon NP; Eadie TL
    J Voice; 2014 Jul; 28(4):469-75. PubMed ID: 24629645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Perceptual Error Identification of Human and Synthesized Voices.
    Englert M; Madazio G; Gielow I; Lucero J; Behlau M
    J Voice; 2016 Sep; 30(5):639.e17-23. PubMed ID: 26337775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Perceptual Detection of Subtle Dysphonic Traits in Individuals with Cervical Spinal Cord Injury Using an Audience Response Systems Approach.
    Johansson K; Strömbergsson S; Robieux C; McAllister A
    J Voice; 2017 Jan; 31(1):126.e7-126.e17. PubMed ID: 26850470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Effect of Auditory-Perceptual Training With Natural Voice Anchors on Vocal Quality Evaluation.
    Dos Santos PCM; Vieira MN; Sansão JPH; Gama ACC
    J Voice; 2019 Mar; 33(2):220-225. PubMed ID: 29331406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Multidimensional assessment of strongly irregular voices such as in substitution voicing and spasmodic dysphonia: a compilation of own research.
    Moerman M; Martens JP; Dejonckere P
    Logoped Phoniatr Vocol; 2015 Apr; 40(1):24-9. PubMed ID: 25019410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A comparison of Dysphonia Severity Index and Acoustic Voice Quality Index measures in differentiating normal and dysphonic voices.
    Uloza V; Latoszek BBV; Ulozaite-Staniene N; Petrauskas T; Maryn Y
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2018 Apr; 275(4):949-958. PubMed ID: 29442165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Listeners' attitude toward people with dysphonia.
    Amir O; Levine-Yundof R
    J Voice; 2013 Jul; 27(4):524.e1-10. PubMed ID: 23490129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Is perceived dysphonia related to perceived healthiness?
    Maryn Y; Debo K
    Logoped Phoniatr Vocol; 2015 Oct; 40(3):122-8. PubMed ID: 24850269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Effects of consensus training on the reliability of auditory perceptual ratings of voice quality.
    Iwarsson J; Reinholt Petersen N
    J Voice; 2012 May; 26(3):304-12. PubMed ID: 21840170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Quantifying the cepstral peak prominence, a measure of dysphonia.
    Heman-Ackah YD; Sataloff RT; Laureyns G; Lurie D; Michael DD; Heuer R; Rubin A; Eller R; Chandran S; Abaza M; Lyons K; Divi V; Lott J; Johnson J; Hillenbrand J
    J Voice; 2014 Nov; 28(6):783-8. PubMed ID: 25179777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Does the Accuracy of Medical Diagnoses Affect Novice Listeners' Auditory-Perceptual Judgments of Dysphonia Severity?
    Sauder C; Eadie T
    J Voice; 2020 Mar; 34(2):197-207. PubMed ID: 30195410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.