These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

81 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25516268)

  • 41. Evolutionary relationships of the cup-fungus genus Peziza and Pezizaceae inferred from multiple nuclear genes: RPB2, beta-tubulin, and LSU rDNA.
    Hansen K; Lobuglio KF; Pfister DH
    Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2005 Jul; 36(1):1-23. PubMed ID: 15904853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. A methodological investigation of hominoid craniodental morphology and phylogenetics.
    Bjarnason A; Chamberlain AT; Lockwood CA
    J Hum Evol; 2011 Jan; 60(1):47-57. PubMed ID: 20951408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Failed refutations: further comments on parsimony and likelihood methods and their relationship to Popper's degree of corroboration.
    de Queiroz K; Poe S
    Syst Biol; 2003 Jun; 52(3):352-67. PubMed ID: 12775524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Phylogeny, landmark analysis and the use of wing venation to study the evolution of social wasps (Hymenoptera: Vespidae: Vespinae).
    Perrard A; Lopez-Osorio F; Carpenter JM
    Cladistics; 2016 Aug; 32(4):406-425. PubMed ID: 34740304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Distinguishing terminal monophyletic groups from reticulate taxa: performance of phenetic, tree-based, and network procedures.
    Reeves PA; Richards CM
    Syst Biol; 2007 Apr; 56(2):302-20. PubMed ID: 17464885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Assessing the performance of single-copy genes for recovering robust phylogenies.
    Aguileta G; Marthey S; Chiapello H; Lebrun MH; Rodolphe F; Fournier E; Gendrault-Jacquemard A; Giraud T
    Syst Biol; 2008 Aug; 57(4):613-27. PubMed ID: 18709599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Resolving deep phylogenetic relationships in salamanders: analyses of mitochondrial and nuclear genomic data.
    Weisrock DW; Harmon LJ; Larson A
    Syst Biol; 2005 Oct; 54(5):758-77. PubMed ID: 16243763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Missing the forest for the trees: phylogenetic compression and its implications for inferring complex evolutionary histories.
    Ané C; Sanderson M
    Syst Biol; 2005 Feb; 54(1):146-57. PubMed ID: 15805016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Phylogenetic relationships of the Lake Tanganyika cichlid tribe Lamprologini: the story from mitochondrial DNA.
    Day JJ; Santini S; Garcia-Moreno J
    Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2007 Nov; 45(2):629-42. PubMed ID: 17416538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Phylogenetic and coalescent strategies of species delimitation in snubnose darters (Percidae: Etheostoma).
    Harrington RC; Near TJ
    Syst Biol; 2012 Jan; 61(1):63-79. PubMed ID: 21828082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Misleading phylogenetic inferences based on single-exemplar sampling in the turtle genus Pseudemys.
    Spinks PQ; Thomson RC; Pauly GB; Newman CE; Mount G; Shaffer HB
    Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2013 Aug; 68(2):269-81. PubMed ID: 23583419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. SuperTRI: A new approach based on branch support analyses of multiple independent data sets for assessing reliability of phylogenetic inferences.
    Ropiquet A; Li B; Hassanin A
    C R Biol; 2009 Sep; 332(9):832-47. PubMed ID: 19748458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Factors influencing phylogenetic inference: a case study using the mammalian carnivores.
    Bininda-Emonds OR
    Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2000 Jul; 16(1):113-26. PubMed ID: 10877944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Molecular phylogenetics of the spider infraorder Mygalomorphae using nuclear rRNA genes (18S and 28S): conflict and agreement with the current system of classification.
    Hedin M; Bond JE
    Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2006 Nov; 41(2):454-71. PubMed ID: 16815045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Phylogeny of Coreopsideae (Asteraceae) using ITS sequences suggests lability in reproductive characters.
    Kimball RT; Crawford DJ
    Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2004 Oct; 33(1):127-39. PubMed ID: 15324843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Phylogeny of extant and fossil Juglandaceae inferred from the integration of molecular and morphological data sets.
    Manos PS; Soltis PS; Soltis DE; Manchester SR; Oh SH; Bell CD; Dilcher DL; Stone DE
    Syst Biol; 2007 Jun; 56(3):412-30. PubMed ID: 17558964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. The utility of cranial ontogeny for phylogenetic inference: a case study in crocodylians using geometric morphometrics.
    Watanabe A; Slice DE
    J Evol Biol; 2014 Jun; 27(6):1078-92. PubMed ID: 24835112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Species tree discordance traces to phylogeographic clade boundaries in North American fence lizards (Sceloporus).
    Leaché AD
    Syst Biol; 2009 Dec; 58(6):547-59. PubMed ID: 20525608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. A new view of insect-crustacean relationships II. Inferences from expressed sequence tags and comparisons with neural cladistics.
    Andrew DR
    Arthropod Struct Dev; 2011 May; 40(3):289-302. PubMed ID: 21315832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Selection of Character Coding Method Is Not Phylogenetically Neutral: A Test Case Using Hominoids.
    Worthington S
    Folia Primatol (Basel); 2017; 88(5):385-400. PubMed ID: 29130999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.