These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
81 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25516268)
61. PASOS: a method for the phylogenetic analysis of shape ontogenies. Catalano SA; Segura V; Vera Candioti F Cladistics; 2019 Dec; 35(6):671-687. PubMed ID: 34618936 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
62. Ancestral state reconstruction of body size in the Caniformia (Carnivora, Mammalia): the effects of incorporating data from the fossil record. Finarelli JA; Flynn JJ Syst Biol; 2006 Apr; 55(2):301-13. PubMed ID: 16611601 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
63. The phylogeny of Cetartiodactyla: the importance of dense taxon sampling, missing data, and the remarkable promise of cytochrome b to provide reliable species-level phylogenies. Agnarsson I; May-Collado LJ Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2008 Sep; 48(3):964-85. PubMed ID: 18590827 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
64. Testing and quantifying phylogenetic signals and homoplasy in morphometric data. Klingenberg CP; Gidaszewski NA Syst Biol; 2010 May; 59(3):245-61. PubMed ID: 20525633 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
65. Ontogenetic Data Analyzed As Such in Phylogenies. Bardin J; Rouget I; Cecca F Syst Biol; 2017 Jan; 66(1):23-37. PubMed ID: 28173595 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
66. Geometric morphometrics, homology and cladistics: review and recommendations. Palci A; Lee MSY Cladistics; 2019 Apr; 35(2):230-242. PubMed ID: 34622971 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
67. SPASOS 1.1: a program for the inference of ancestral shape ontogenies. Catalano SA; Segura V; Vera Candioti F Cladistics; 2021 Oct; 37(5):630-638. PubMed ID: 34570938 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
68. The descriptive and comparative postcranial osteology of marten (Martes americana Turton) and fisher (Martes pennanti Erxleben): the appendicular skeleton. Leach D Can J Zool; 1977 Jan; 55(1):199-214. PubMed ID: 837275 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
69. Phylogenetic morphometrics (I): the use of landmark data in a phylogenetic framework. Catalano SA; Goloboff PA; Giannini NP Cladistics; 2010 Oct; 26(5):539-549. PubMed ID: 34875764 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
70. TNT version 1.5, including a full implementation of phylogenetic morphometrics. Goloboff PA; Catalano SA Cladistics; 2016 Jun; 32(3):221-238. PubMed ID: 34727670 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
71. Size and Shape Analysis of Error-Prone Shape Data. Du J; Dryden IL; Huang X J Am Stat Assoc; 2015 Jan; 110(509):368-379. PubMed ID: 26109745 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
72. Osteometrical studies on the phylogenetic relationships of Japanese native fowls. Nishida T; Hayashi Y; Fujioka T; Tsugiyama I; Mochizuki K Nihon Juigaku Zasshi; 1985 Feb; 47(1):25-37. PubMed ID: 3981840 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
74. The initial phylogenetic appearance of bone: an experimental hypothesis. MOSS ML Trans N Y Acad Sci; 1961 Apr; 23():495-500. PubMed ID: 13773138 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
75. On the Need for Landmark Analysis or Time-dependent Covariates. Zabor EC; Assel M J Urol; 2023 Jun; 209(6):1060-1062. PubMed ID: 37037013 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
77. Landmark trial starts. Davis H Cal J Emerg Med; 2000 Jul; 1(1):3-4. PubMed ID: 20852716 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
78. Combining data in phylogenetic analysis. William J; Ballard O Trends Ecol Evol; 1996 Aug; 11(8):334. PubMed ID: 21237865 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
79. The more, the better: the use of multiple landmark configurations to solve the phylogenetic relationships in musteloids. Catalano SA; Ercoli MD; Prevosti FJ Syst Biol; 2015 Mar; 64(2):294-306. PubMed ID: 25516268 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]