These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
216 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25516509)
1. A modified regression method to test publication bias in meta-analyses with binary outcomes. Jin ZC; Wu C; Zhou XH; He J BMC Med Res Methodol; 2014 Dec; 14():132. PubMed ID: 25516509 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Arcsine test for publication bias in meta-analyses with binary outcomes. Rücker G; Schwarzer G; Carpenter J Stat Med; 2008 Feb; 27(5):746-63. PubMed ID: 17592831 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of two methods to detect publication bias in meta-analysis. Peters JL; Sutton AJ; Jones DR; Abrams KR; Rushton L JAMA; 2006 Feb; 295(6):676-80. PubMed ID: 16467236 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A modified test for small-study effects in meta-analyses of controlled trials with binary endpoints. Harbord RM; Egger M; Sterne JA Stat Med; 2006 Oct; 25(20):3443-57. PubMed ID: 16345038 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Meta-analyses with binary outcomes: how many studies need to be omitted to detect a publication bias? Saveleva E; Selinski S J Toxicol Environ Health A; 2008; 71(13-14):845-50. PubMed ID: 18569583 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A comparison of methods to detect publication bias in meta-analysis. Macaskill P; Walter SD; Irwig L Stat Med; 2001 Feb; 20(4):641-54. PubMed ID: 11223905 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Empirical Comparison of Publication Bias Tests in Meta-Analysis. Lin L; Chu H; Murad MH; Hong C; Qu Z; Cole SR; Chen Y J Gen Intern Med; 2018 Aug; 33(8):1260-1267. PubMed ID: 29663281 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Assessment of regression-based methods to adjust for publication bias through a comprehensive simulation study. Moreno SG; Sutton AJ; Ades AE; Stanley TD; Abrams KR; Peters JL; Cooper NJ BMC Med Res Methodol; 2009 Jan; 9():2. PubMed ID: 19138428 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Testing for publication bias in diagnostic meta-analysis: a simulation study. Bürkner PC; Doebler P Stat Med; 2014 Aug; 33(18):3061-77. PubMed ID: 24753050 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The appropriateness of asymmetry tests for publication bias in meta-analyses: a large survey. Ioannidis JP; Trikalinos TA CMAJ; 2007 Apr; 176(8):1091-6. PubMed ID: 17420491 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Inflation of type I error rate in two statistical tests for the detection of publication bias in meta-analyses with binary outcomes. Schwarzer G; Antes G; Schumacher M Stat Med; 2002 Sep; 21(17):2465-77. PubMed ID: 12205693 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The prevalence and effect of publication bias in orthopaedic meta-analyses. Vavken P; Dorotka R J Orthop Sci; 2011 Mar; 16(2):238-44. PubMed ID: 21360256 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Meta-regression approximations to reduce publication selection bias. Stanley TD; Doucouliagos H Res Synth Methods; 2014 Mar; 5(1):60-78. PubMed ID: 26054026 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Publication and related bias in meta-analysis: power of statistical tests and prevalence in the literature. Sterne JA; Gavaghan D; Egger M J Clin Epidemiol; 2000 Nov; 53(11):1119-29. PubMed ID: 11106885 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Quantifying the risk of error when interpreting funnel plots. Simmonds M Syst Rev; 2015 Mar; 4():24. PubMed ID: 25875027 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Publication bias was not a good reason to discourage trials with low power. Borm GF; den Heijer M; Zielhuis GA J Clin Epidemiol; 2009 Jan; 62(1):47.e1-10. PubMed ID: 18620841 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A test for publication bias in meta-analysis with sparse binary data. Schwarzer G; Antes G; Schumacher M Stat Med; 2007 Feb; 26(4):721-33. PubMed ID: 16755545 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The performance of tests of publication bias and other sample size effects in systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy was assessed. Deeks JJ; Macaskill P; Irwig L J Clin Epidemiol; 2005 Sep; 58(9):882-93. PubMed ID: 16085191 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Performance of the trim and fill method in the presence of publication bias and between-study heterogeneity. Peters JL; Sutton AJ; Jones DR; Abrams KR; Rushton L Stat Med; 2007 Nov; 26(25):4544-62. PubMed ID: 17476644 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Quantifying publication bias in meta-analysis. Lin L; Chu H Biometrics; 2018 Sep; 74(3):785-794. PubMed ID: 29141096 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]