These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

178 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25516879)

  • 21. Four-year clinical evaluation of posterior resin-based composite restorations placed using the total-etch technique.
    Baratieri LN; Ritter AV
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2001; 13(1):50-7. PubMed ID: 11831309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Clinical Evaluation of a Silorane- and a Methacrylate-Based Resin Composite in Class II Restorations: 24-Month Results.
    Karaman E; Yazici AR; Ozgunaltay G; Ustunkol I; Berber A
    Oper Dent; 2017; 42(4):E102-E110. PubMed ID: 28682704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. One-year clinical evaluation of composite restorations in posterior teeth: effect of adhesive systems.
    Sundfeld RH; Scatolin RS; Oliveira FG; Machado LS; Alexandre RS; Sundefeld ML
    Oper Dent; 2012; 37(6):E1-8. PubMed ID: 22621163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Application of etch-and-rinse adhesives on dry and rewet dentin under rubbing action: a 24-month clinical evaluation.
    Zander-Grande C; Ferreira SQ; da Costa TR; Loguercio AD; Reis A
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2011 Jul; 142(7):828-35. PubMed ID: 21719806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. How to repair fillings made by silorane-based composites.
    Ivanovas S; Hickel R; Ilie N
    Clin Oral Investig; 2011 Dec; 15(6):915-22. PubMed ID: 20953808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Effect of surface treatments on microtensile bond strength of repaired aged silorane resin composite.
    Palasuk J; Platt JA; Cho SD; Levon JA; Brown DT; Hovijitra ST
    Oper Dent; 2013; 38(1):91-9. PubMed ID: 22830537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Two-year clinical evaluation of ormocer and nanofill composite with and without a flowable liner.
    Efes BG; Dörter C; Gömeç Y; Koray F
    J Adhes Dent; 2006 Apr; 8(2):119-26. PubMed ID: 16708724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A new universal simplified adhesive: 6-month clinical evaluation.
    Mena-Serrano A; Kose C; De Paula EA; Tay LY; Reis A; Loguercio AD; Perdigão J
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2013 Feb; 25(1):55-69. PubMed ID: 23374411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Two-year interfacial bond durability and nanoleakage of repaired silorane-based resin composite.
    Mobarak E; El-Deeb H
    Oper Dent; 2013; 38(4):408-18. PubMed ID: 23110581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Clinical evaluation of resin-based composites in posterior restorations: two-year results.
    Arhun N; Celik C; Yamanel K
    Oper Dent; 2010; 35(4):397-404. PubMed ID: 20672723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Five-year clinical effectiveness of a two-step self-etching adhesive.
    Peumans M; De Munck J; Van Landuyt K; Lambrechts P; Van Meerbeek B
    J Adhes Dent; 2007 Feb; 9(1):7-10. PubMed ID: 17432395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. One-year Clinical Evaluation of Resin Composite Restorations of Noncarious Cervical Lesions in Smokers.
    de Carvalho LD; Gondo R; Lopes GC
    J Adhes Dent; 2015 Aug; 17(5):405-11. PubMed ID: 26525004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Practice-based, clinical trial of a silorane-based composite resin system in posterior teeth.
    Malhotra N; Somashekar ST; Mala K; Pai V; Shenoy R
    SADJ; 2013 Sep; 68(8):358, 360-3. PubMed ID: 24660403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Repair bond strength in aged methacrylate- and silorane-based composites.
    Bacchi A; Consani RL; Sinhoreti MA; Feitosa VP; Cavalcante LM; Pfeifer CS; Schneider LF
    J Adhes Dent; 2013 Oct; 15(5):447-52. PubMed ID: 23593643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Marginal quality of posterior microhybrid resin composite restorations applied using two polymerisation protocols: 5-year randomised split mouth trial.
    Barabanti N; Gagliani M; Roulet JF; Testori T; Ozcan M; Cerutti A
    J Dent; 2013 May; 41(5):436-42. PubMed ID: 23454329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Clinical evaluation of a nanohybrid and a flowable resin composite in non-carious cervical lesions: 24-month results.
    Karaman E; Yazici AR; Ozgunaltay G; Dayangac B
    J Adhes Dent; 2012 Aug; 14(5):485-92. PubMed ID: 22724113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A 12-month clinical evaluation of composite resins in class III restorations.
    Loguercio AD; Lorini E; Weiss RV; Tori AP; Picinatto CC; Ribeiro NR; Reis A
    J Adhes Dent; 2007 Feb; 9(1):57-64. PubMed ID: 17432402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Two-year clinical performance of a low-shrinkage composite in posterior restorations.
    Baracco B; Perdigão J; Cabrera E; Ceballos L
    Oper Dent; 2013; 38(6):591-600. PubMed ID: 23570300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. In vitro comparison of microleakage of posterior resin composites with and without liner using two-step etch-and-rinse and self-etch dentin adhesive systems.
    Kasraei S; Azarsina M; Majidi S
    Oper Dent; 2011; 36(2):213-21. PubMed ID: 21702678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Influence of chlorhexidine digluconate on the clinical performance of adhesive restorations: a 3-year follow-up.
    Sartori N; Stolf SC; Silva SB; Lopes GC; Carrilho M
    J Dent; 2013 Dec; 41(12):1188-95. PubMed ID: 24076103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.