These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. Impact of inhomogeneous optical scattering coefficient distribution on recovery of optical absorption coefficient maps using tomographic photoacoustic data. Li X; Jiang H Phys Med Biol; 2013 Feb; 58(4):999-1011. PubMed ID: 23339968 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Simultaneous reconstruction of absorption, scattering and anisotropy factor distributions in quantitative photoacoustic tomography. Asllanaj F; Addoum A Biomed Phys Eng Express; 2020 May; 6(4):045010. PubMed ID: 33444271 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A Multi-Grid Iterative Method for Photoacoustic Tomography. Javaherian A; Holman S IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2017 Mar; 36(3):696-706. PubMed ID: 27834644 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Two-dimensional quantitative photoacoustic image reconstruction of absorption distributions in scattering media by use of a simple iterative method. Cox BT; Arridge SR; Köstli KP; Beard PC Appl Opt; 2006 Mar; 45(8):1866-75. PubMed ID: 16572706 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Reconstruction of optical absorption coefficient distribution in intravascular photoacoustic imaging. Zheng S; Lan Z Comput Biol Med; 2018 Jun; 97():37-49. PubMed ID: 29689466 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Two schemes for quantitative photoacoustic tomography based on Monte Carlo simulation. Liu Y; Jiang H; Yuan Z Med Phys; 2016 Jul; 43(7):3987. PubMed ID: 27370117 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Frequency-domain optical imaging of absorption and scattering distributions by a Born iterative method. Yao Y; Wang Y; Pei Y; Zhu W; Barbour RL J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 1997 Jan; 14(1):325-42. PubMed ID: 8988624 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Quantitative photoacoustic tomography using forward and adjoint Monte Carlo models of radiance. Hochuli R; Powell S; Arridge S; Cox B J Biomed Opt; 2016 Dec; 21(12):126004. PubMed ID: 27918801 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Computationally efficient error estimate for evaluation of regularization in photoacoustic tomography. Bhatt M; Acharya A; Yalavarthy PK J Biomed Opt; 2016 Oct; 21(10):106002. PubMed ID: 27762422 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Influence of the absorber dimensions on wavefront shaping based on volumetric optoacoustic feedback. Deán-Ben XL; Estrada H; Ozbek A; Razansky D Opt Lett; 2015 Nov; 40(22):5395-8. PubMed ID: 26565883 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Quantitative Photoacoustic Tomography Using Iteratively Refined Wavefield Reconstruction Inversion: A Simulation Study. Ranjbaran SM; Aghamiry HS; Gholami A; Operto S; Avanaki K IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2024 Feb; 43(2):874-885. PubMed ID: 37847617 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Model-based reconstruction integrated with fluence compensation for photoacoustic tomography. Bu S; Liu Z; Shiina T; Kondo K; Yamakawa M; Fukutani K; Someda Y; Asao Y IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2012 May; 59(5):1354-63. PubMed ID: 22345521 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. An adaptive filtered back-projection for photoacoustic image reconstruction. Huang H; Bustamante G; Peterson R; Ye JY Med Phys; 2015 May; 42(5):2169-78. PubMed ID: 25979011 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A least-squares fixed-point iterative algorithm for multiple illumination photoacoustic tomography. Harrison T; Shao P; Zemp RJ Biomed Opt Express; 2013; 4(10):2224-30. PubMed ID: 24156078 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A calibration-free, one-step method for quantitative photoacoustic tomography. Yuan Z; Jiang H Med Phys; 2012 Nov; 39(11):6895-9. PubMed ID: 23127082 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Curve-Driven-Based Acoustic Inversion for Photoacoustic Tomography. Liu H; Wang K; Peng D; Li H; Zhu Y; Zhang S; Liu M; Tian J IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2016 Dec; 35(12):2546-2557. PubMed ID: 27352391 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]