These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25517452)

  • 21. Incorporation of potential for multimedia exposure into chemical hazard scores for pollution prevention.
    Whaley DA; Meloy TP; Barrett SS; Bedillion EJ
    Drug Chem Toxicol; 1999 Feb; 22(1):241-73. PubMed ID: 10189582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The applicability of chemical alternatives assessment for engineered nanomaterials.
    Hjorth R; Hansen SF; Jacobs M; Tickner J; Ellenbecker M; Baun A
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2017 Jan; 13(1):177-187. PubMed ID: 26887668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Businesses and advocacy groups create a road map for safer chemicals: the BizNGO Principles for Chemicals Policy.
    Rossi MS; Thorpe B; Peele C
    New Solut; 2011; 21(3):387-402. PubMed ID: 22001037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Optimizing Chemicals Management in the United States and Canada through the Essential-Use Approach.
    Bǎlan SA; Andrews DQ; Blum A; Diamond ML; Fernández SR; Harriman E; Lindstrom AB; Reade A; Richter L; Sutton R; Wang Z; Kwiatkowski CF
    Environ Sci Technol; 2023 Jan; 57(4):1568-1575. PubMed ID: 36656107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Exponential growth of new chemicals and evolution of information relevant to risk control.
    Binetti R; Costamagna FM; Marcello I
    Ann Ist Super Sanita; 2008; 44(1):13-5. PubMed ID: 18469371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Risk management measures for chemicals: the "COSHH essentials" approach.
    Garrod AN; Evans PG; Davy CW
    J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol; 2007 Dec; 17 Suppl 1():S48-54. PubMed ID: 17565355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Evaluation of the California Safer Consumer Products Regulation and the impact on consumers and product manufacturers.
    Cowan DM; Kingsbury T; Perez AL; Woods TA; Kovochich M; Hill DS; Madl AK; Paustenbach DJ
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2014 Feb; 68(1):23-40. PubMed ID: 24231524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Risk management frameworks for human health and environmental risks.
    Jardine C; Hrudey S; Shortreed J; Craig L; Krewski D; Furgal C; McColl S
    J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev; 2003; 6(6):569-720. PubMed ID: 14698953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The drive for a safer chemicals policy in the United States.
    Belliveau ME
    New Solut; 2011; 21(3):359-86. PubMed ID: 22001036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Substitution for hazardous chemicals on an international level--the approach of the European project "SUBSPORT".
    Lissner L; Romano D
    New Solut; 2011; 21(3):477-97. PubMed ID: 22001043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. That which must not, can not be... A reply to the EChA and EDF responses to the REACH analysis of animal use and costs.
    Hartung T; Rovida C
    ALTEX; 2009; 26(4):307-11. PubMed ID: 20957835
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Perspectives on trace chemical safety and chemophobia: risk communication and risk management.
    Lee BM; Kwon S; Cho YM; Kim KB; Seo K; Min CS; Kim K
    J Toxicol Environ Health A; 2019; 82(2):113-127. PubMed ID: 30663519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Perspectives on trace chemical safety and chemophobia: risk communication and risk management.
    Lee BM; Kwon S; Cho YM; Kim KB; Seo K; Min CS; Kim K
    J Toxicol Environ Health A; 2019; 82(3):186-199. PubMed ID: 30741122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. [REACH: the guidance documents of the European Chemicals Agency (ECHA)].
    Lulei M;
    Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz; 2008 Dec; 51(12):1444-52. PubMed ID: 19137220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Chemical quandary: chemicals are essential to our way of life, but who's ensuring their safe use?
    Farquhar D
    State Legis; 2014 Dec; 40(10):32-4. PubMed ID: 25556254
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Integrated testing and intelligent assessment-new challenges under REACH.
    Ahlers J; Stock F; Werschkun B
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2008 Oct; 15(7):565-72. PubMed ID: 18818964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Redesigning chemicals policy: a very different approach.
    Geiser K
    New Solut; 2011; 21(3):329-44. PubMed ID: 22001034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. US to debate tightening legislation on safety of chemicals.
    Loewenberg S
    Lancet; 2008 Sep; 372(9643):1023-4. PubMed ID: 18810802
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Time matters: A stock-pollution approach to authorisation decision-making for PBT/vPvB chemicals under REACH.
    Gabbert S; Hilber I
    J Environ Manage; 2016 Dec; 183():236-244. PubMed ID: 27594688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Chemical alternatives assessment: enabling substitution to safer chemicals.
    Lavoie ET; Heine LG; Holder H; Rossi MS; Lee RE; Connor EA; Vrabel MA; Difiore DM; Davies CL
    Environ Sci Technol; 2010 Dec; 44(24):9244-9. PubMed ID: 21062050
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.