163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25518301)
1. Maylard incision in gynecologic surgery: 4-year experience in Thammasat University Hospital.
Manusook S; Suwannarurk K; Pongrojpaw D; Bhamarapravatana K
J Med Assoc Thai; 2014 Aug; 97 Suppl 8():S102-7. PubMed ID: 25518301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparative Study of Postoperative Pain between Maylard Incision and Pfannenstiel Incision in Gynecologic Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Chaywiriyangkool C; Manusook S; Pongrojpaw D; Somprasit C; Bhamarapravatana K; Suwannarurk K
J Med Assoc Thai; 2016 Jul; 99 Suppl 4():S16-22. PubMed ID: 29916668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Pfannenstiel versus Maylard incision for gynecologic surgery: a randomized, double-blind controlled trial.
Ghanbari Z; Baratali BH; Foroughifar T; Pesikhani MD; Shariat M
Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Jun; 48(2):120-3. PubMed ID: 19574171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Radical hysterectomy: does the type of incision matter?
Orr JW; Orr PJ; Bolen DD; Holimon JL
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1995 Aug; 173(2):399-405; discussion 405-6. PubMed ID: 7645614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of postoperative pain outcomes after vertical or Pfannenstiel incision for major gynecologic surgery.
Habib AS; Wahl K; Gu J; Gan TJ;
Curr Med Res Opin; 2009 Jun; 25(6):1529-34. PubMed ID: 19438408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The Maylard incision in gynecologic surgery.
Helmkamp BF; Krebs HB
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1990 Nov; 163(5 Pt 1):1554-7. PubMed ID: 2146878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Beyond the Pfannenstiel: Minimally invasive Laparotomy Incisions for Maximum Exposure.
Skolnik E; Miazga E; Zakhari A; Cai E; Ziegler C; Murji A
J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2021 Mar; 43(3):368. PubMed ID: 33197623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Feasibility of the Maylard transverse incision for ovarian cancer cytoreductive surgery.
Fanning J; Pruett A; Flora RF
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2007; 14(3):352-5. PubMed ID: 17478369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Pfannenstiel versus Maylard incision for cesarean delivery: A randomized controlled trial.
Giacalone PL; Daures JP; Vignal J; Herisson C; Hedon B; Laffargue F
Obstet Gynecol; 2002 May; 99(5 Pt 1):745-50. PubMed ID: 11978282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Assesment of selected parameters depending on the size of abdominal wall incision in patients subjected to minilaparotomy due to benign gynaecological diseases].
Malinowski A; Matyszewski A; Bartosiak-Majcher I; Wojciechowski M
Ginekol Pol; 2008 Mar; 79(3):192-7. PubMed ID: 18592854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A retrospective analysis of radical hysterectomies done for cervical cancer: is there a role for the Pfannenstiel incision?
Scribner DR; Kamelle SA; Gould N; Tillmanns T; Wilson MA; McMeekin S; Gold MA; Mannel RS
Gynecol Oncol; 2001 Jun; 81(3):481-4. PubMed ID: 11371142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of midline and Pfannenstiel incision for radical hysterectomy with pelvic and paraaortic lymphadenectomy in cervical carcinoma.
Ayhan A; Dursun P; Gultekin M; Yuce K
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2007 Apr; 33(2):161-5. PubMed ID: 17441889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of the Pfannenstiel incision for radical abdominal hysterectomy with pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy.
Mendez LE; Cantuaria G; Angioli R; Mirhashemi R; Gabriel C; Estape R; Penalver M
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 1999 Sep; 9(5):418-420. PubMed ID: 11240804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Single-port laparoscopy in gynecologic oncology: seven years of experience at a single institution.
Moulton L; Jernigan AM; Carr C; Freeman L; Escobar PF; Michener CM
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Nov; 217(5):610.e1-610.e8. PubMed ID: 28619688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Surgical incision for cesarean section.
Ayers JW; Morley GW
Obstet Gynecol; 1987 Nov; 70(5):706-8. PubMed ID: 2958727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The legendary superior strength of the Pfannenstiel incision: a myth?
Hendrix SL; Schimp V; Martin J; Singh A; Kruger M; McNeeley SG
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2000 Jun; 182(6):1446-51. PubMed ID: 10871464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Initial experience in the laparoscopic treatment of benign and malignant gynaecological diseases in the Hospital Regional de Alta Especialidad in Oaxaca].
Vásquez-Ciriaco S; Isla-Ortiz D; Palomeque-Lopez A; García-Espinoza JA; Jarquín-Arremilla A; Lechuga-García NA
Cir Cir; 2017; 85(1):12-20. PubMed ID: 27320647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Minilaparotomy hysterectomy: a valid option for the treatment of benign uterine pathologies.
Panici PB; Zullo MA; Angioli R; Muzii L
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2005 Apr; 119(2):228-31. PubMed ID: 15808385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of Pfannenstiel or Extended Iliac Port Site Kidney Extraction in Laparoscopic Donor Nephrectomy: Do We Have Consensus?
Iemsupakkul P; Kongchareonsombat W; Kijvikai K
Exp Clin Transplant; 2017 Apr; 15(2):138-142. PubMed ID: 28338459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Mini-lap hysterectomy revisited with new concepts and technical modifications.
Chalkoo M; Ahangar S; Durrani AM; Shah MJ; Habib R; Chalkoo S
Int J Surg; 2011; 9(5):404-9. PubMed ID: 21457802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
