BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

180 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25519145)

  • 1. Electro-acoustic performance of the new bone vibrator Radioear B81: a comparison with the conventional Radioear B71.
    Jansson KJ; Håkansson B; Johannsen L; Tengstrand T
    Int J Audiol; 2015 May; 54(5):334-40. PubMed ID: 25519145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Measurements of bone conduction auditory brainstem response with the new audiometric bone conduction transducer Radioear B81.
    Keceli S; Stenfelt S
    Int J Audiol; 2018 Aug; 57(8):577-583. PubMed ID: 29911916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The balanced electromagnetic separation transducer a new bone conduction transducer.
    Håkansson BE
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Feb; 113(2):818-25. PubMed ID: 12597176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of Bone-Conducted Cervical VEMPs Elicited by B71 and B81 Bone Vibrators.
    Romero DJ; Piker EG; Thorne A; Clinard C
    Ear Hear; 2021; 42(3):596-605. PubMed ID: 33577217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Vibrotactile Thresholds on the Mastoid and Forehead Position of Deaf Patients Using Radioear B71 and B81.
    Fredén Jansson KJ; Håkansson B; Reinfeldt S; Fröhlich L; Rahne T
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(6):714-723. PubMed ID: 28737551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of bone-conduction harmonic distortions on hearing thresholds.
    Eichenauer A; Dillon H; Clinch B; Loi T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Aug; 136(2):EL96-102. PubMed ID: 25096153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Acoustic method for calibration of audiometric bone vibrators. II. Harmonic distortion.
    Ginter SM; Margolis RH
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Jul; 134(1):EL33-7. PubMed ID: 23862903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Electroacoustic evaluation of the bone conduction transducer B250 for vestibular and hearing diagnostics in comparison with Radioear B71 and B81.
    Fredén Jansson KJ; Håkansson B; Persson AC; Verrecchia L; Reinfeldt S
    Int J Audiol; 2024 May; ():1-7. PubMed ID: 38742487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Influence of transducer types on bone conduction hearing thresholds.
    Fröhlich L; Plontke SK; Rahne T
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(4):e0195233. PubMed ID: 29641550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A system for generating a variable mechanical impedance and its use in an investigation of the electromechanical properties of the B71 audiometric bone vibrator.
    Haughton PM
    Br J Audiol; 1982 Feb; 16(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 7055651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Acoustic method for calibration of audiometric bone vibrators.
    Margolis RH; Stiepan SM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Feb; 131(2):1221-5. PubMed ID: 22352496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Characterization and Clinical Use of Bone Conduction Transducers at Extended High Frequencies.
    Remenschneider AK; Cheng JT; Herrmann BS; Rosowski JJ
    Hear Res; 2023 Mar; 429():108688. PubMed ID: 36628803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Maximum Output and Low-Frequency Limitations of B71 and B81 Clinical Bone Vibrators: Implications for Vestibular Evoked Potentials.
    Clinard CG; Piker EG; Thorne AP; Surface EN; Anderson AE; Beacham VA; Crouse MC; Whitney VH; Depaolis RA
    Ear Hear; 2020; 41(4):847-854. PubMed ID: 31613822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Normative Wave V latency-intensity functions using the EARTONE 3A insert earphone and the Radioear B-71 bone vibrator.
    Beattie RC
    Scand Audiol; 1998; 27(2):120-6. PubMed ID: 9638831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Influence of stimulation position on the sensitivity for bone conduction hearing aids without skin penetration.
    Dobrev I; Stenfelt S; Röösli C; Bolt L; Pfiffner F; Gerig R; Huber A; Sim JH
    Int J Audiol; 2016 Aug; 55(8):439-46. PubMed ID: 27139310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Frequency response and output variations of Radioear B-71 and B-72 bone vibrators.
    Richards WD; Frank T
    Ear Hear; 1982; 3(1):37-8. PubMed ID: 7060845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Bone conduction threshold levels for different bone vibrator types.
    Frank T; Byrne DC; Richards LA
    J Speech Hear Disord; 1988 Aug; 53(3):295-301. PubMed ID: 3398482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Middle-ear function at high frequencies quantified with advanced bone-conduction measures.
    Popelka GR; Telukuntla G; Puria S
    Hear Res; 2010 May; 263(1-2):85-92. PubMed ID: 19900526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Auditory steady-state responses to bone conduction stimuli in children with hearing loss.
    Swanepoel de W; Ebrahim S; Friedland P; Swanepoel A; Pottas L
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2008 Dec; 72(12):1861-71. PubMed ID: 18963045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Calibration force levels for bone conduction vibrators.
    Billings BL; Winter M
    J Speech Hear Res; 1977 Dec; 20(4):653-60. PubMed ID: 604679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.