180 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25519145)
21. Comparison of Thresholds Obtained With the Radioear B-71 and B-81 Bone-Conduction Transducers.
Rao A; Altus B; Schroeder R; Margolis RH
Ear Hear; 2020; 41(6):1775-1778. PubMed ID: 33136651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Infant air and bone conduction tone burst auditory brain stem responses for classification of hearing loss and the relationship to behavioral thresholds.
Vander Werff KR; Prieve BA; Georgantas LM
Ear Hear; 2009 Jun; 30(3):350-68. PubMed ID: 19322084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Acoustic radiation produced by B-71, B-72, and KH 70 bone vibrators.
Frank T; Crandell CC
Ear Hear; 1986 Oct; 7(5):344-7. PubMed ID: 3770330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Extended high-frequency bone conduction audiometry Calibration of bone conductor transducers in the conventional and extended high-frequency range.
Rhebergen KS
Int J Audiol; 2023 Feb; 62(2):182-191. PubMed ID: 35195500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. A method for calibration of bone driver transducers to measure the mastoid impedance.
Weece R; Allen J
Hear Res; 2010 May; 263(1-2):216-23. PubMed ID: 20193750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Bone-conducted stimulation in electrocochleography.
Arlinger SD; Kylén P
Acta Otolaryngol; 1977; 84(5-6):377-84. PubMed ID: 920139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Transcranial attenuation of bone-conducted sound when stimulation is at the mastoid and at the bone conduction hearing aid position.
Stenfelt S
Otol Neurotol; 2012 Feb; 33(2):105-14. PubMed ID: 22193619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Behavioral audiometry: protocols for measuring hearing thresholds in babies aged 4-18 months.
Delaroche M; Thiebaut R; Dauman R
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2004 Oct; 68(10):1233-43. PubMed ID: 15364493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Quantifying air-conducted acoustic radiation from the bone-conduction vibrator.
Harkrider AW; Martin FN
J Am Acad Audiol; 1998 Dec; 9(6):410-6. PubMed ID: 9865773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Intraoperative ossicular loading with the Otologics fully implantable hearing device.
Jenkins HA; Pergola N; Kasic J
Acta Otolaryngol; 2007 Apr; 127(4):360-4. PubMed ID: 17453454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. The EarLens system: new sound transduction methods.
Perkins R; Fay JP; Rucker P; Rosen M; Olson L; Puria S
Hear Res; 2010 May; 263(1-2):104-13. PubMed ID: 20116419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Effect of static force on bone conduction hearing thresholds and comfort.
Toll LE; Emanuel DC; Letowski T
Int J Audiol; 2011 Sep; 50(9):632-5. PubMed ID: 21506894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. A brief communication on bone conduction artefacts.
Bell I; Goodsell S; Thornton AR
Br J Audiol; 1980 Aug; 14(3):73-5. PubMed ID: 7417727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Establishing transducers-dependent sensorineural acuity level normative data among young Malaysian adults.
Zakaria MN; Ensin EG; Awang MA; Salim R; Nik Othman NA; Rashid MFN
Med J Malaysia; 2023 Dec; 78(7):901-906. PubMed ID: 38159926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Transmission pathways of vibratory stimulation as measured by subjective thresholds and distortion-product otoacoustic emissions.
Watanabe T; Bertoli S; Probst R
Ear Hear; 2008 Oct; 29(5):667-73. PubMed ID: 18596647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Bone-conduction force values for the sensorineural acuity level (SAL) test.
Beattie RC; Daily LB
J Aud Res; 1982 Jan; 22(1):51-60. PubMed ID: 7187910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Two-port network analysis and modeling of a balanced armature receiver.
Kim N; Allen JB
Hear Res; 2013 Jul; 301():156-67. PubMed ID: 23485425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. The effect of temperature on the performance of audiometric mechanical coupler systems.
Dowson SP; McNeill HA
Br J Audiol; 1992 Oct; 26(5):275-81. PubMed ID: 1486355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. [Bone conduction auditory brainstem responses in normal hearing individuals].
de Freitas VS; de Alvarenga KF; Morettin M; de Souza EF; Filho OA
Pro Fono; 2006; 18(3):323-30. PubMed ID: 17180801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Relative effective frequency response of bone versus air conduction stimulation examined via masking.
Durrant JD; Hyre R
Audiology; 1993; 32(3):175-84. PubMed ID: 8489478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
