These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

86 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25519201)

  • 1. How do maternal views of delivery outcomes vary by demographics and preferred mode of delivery?
    Sparks TN; Yeaton-Massey A; Granados JM; Handler SJ; Meyer M; Caughey AB
    Am J Perinatol; 2015 Jul; 32(8):741-6. PubMed ID: 25519201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Preference toward future mode of delivery: how do antepartum preferences and prior delivery experience contribute?
    Sparks TN; Yeaton-Massey A; Granados JM; Handler SJ; Meyer MR; Caughey AB
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2015; 28(14):1673-8. PubMed ID: 25212977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Women's antenatal preferences for delivery route in a setting with high cesarean section rates and a medically dominated maternity system.
    Dweik D; Girasek E; Töreki A; Mészáros G; Pál A
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2014 Apr; 93(4):408-15. PubMed ID: 24575805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Maternal adaptations in preparation for parturition predict uncomplicated spontaneous delivery outcome.
    Oliphant SS; Nygaard IE; Zong W; Canavan TP; Moalli PA
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Dec; 211(6):630.e1-7. PubMed ID: 24931474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Chilean women's preferences regarding mode of delivery: which do they prefer and why?
    Angeja AC; Washington AE; Vargas JE; Gomez R; Rojas I; Caughey AB
    BJOG; 2006 Nov; 113(11):1253-8. PubMed ID: 17014679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Non-medical factors affecting antenatal preferences for delivery route and actual delivery mode of women in southwestern Iran.
    Rajabi A; Maharlouei N; Rezaianzadeh A; Rajaeefard A; Keshavarzi S; Lankarani KB; Gholami A
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2016 Nov; 29(22):3622-8. PubMed ID: 26753876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Vaginal delivery compared with elective caesarean section: the views of pregnant women and clinicians.
    Turner CE; Young JM; Solomon MJ; Ludlow J; Benness C; Phipps H
    BJOG; 2008 Nov; 115(12):1494-502. PubMed ID: 18752584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Impact of first childbirth on changes in women's preference for mode of delivery: follow-up of a longitudinal observational study.
    Pang MW; Leung TN; Lau TK; Hang Chung TK
    Birth; 2008 Jun; 35(2):121-8. PubMed ID: 18507583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Predictors of failed trial of labor among women with an extremely obese body mass index.
    Gunatilake RP; Smrtka MP; Harris B; Kraus DM; Small MJ; Grotegut CA; Brown HL
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Dec; 209(6):562.e1-5. PubMed ID: 23891628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Historic cohort study on mode of delivery of a macrosomic baby: the women's point of view.
    Vercellini P; Fumagalli M; Consonni D; de Braud L; Barbara G; Iurlaro E; Mosca F; Fedele L
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2015 Nov; 94(11):1235-44. PubMed ID: 26248808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Why women request cesarean section without medical indication?
    Dursun P; Yanik FB; Zeyneloglu HB; Baser E; Kuscu E; Ayhan A
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2011 Sep; 24(9):1133-7. PubMed ID: 21668323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Birth complications, overweight, and physical inactivity.
    Voldner N; Frøslie KF; Haakstad LA; Bø K; Henriksen T
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2009; 88(5):550-5. PubMed ID: 19277916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Increased risk of cesarean delivery with advancing maternal age: indications and associated factors in nulliparous women.
    Ecker JL; Chen KT; Cohen AP; Riley LE; Lieberman ES
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2001 Oct; 185(4):883-7. PubMed ID: 11641671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Women's perceptions of induction of labour outcomes: Results of an online-survey in Germany.
    Schwarz C; Gross MM; Heusser P; Berger B
    Midwifery; 2016 Apr; 35():3-10. PubMed ID: 27060393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Mode of Delivery Preference Among Pregnant Nulliparous Women.
    Kjerulff KH; Attanasio LB; Edmonds JK; Repke JT
    J Womens Health (Larchmt); 2019 Jun; 28(6):874-884. PubMed ID: 30412449
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Change of childbirth preference after delivery among nulliparous Chinese women and their partners.
    Li WY; Liabsuetrakul T; Stray-Pedersen B
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2014 Jan; 40(1):184-91. PubMed ID: 24102777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Induction of labor and cesarean delivery by gestational age.
    Caughey AB; Nicholson JM; Cheng YW; Lyell DJ; Washington AE
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Sep; 195(3):700-5. PubMed ID: 16949399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The factors associated with mode of delivery in fetuses with congenital heart defects.
    Asoglu MR; Bears B; Turan S; Harman C; Turan OM
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2020 Mar; 33(5):816-824. PubMed ID: 30153755
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Reproduction and mode of delivery in women with vaginismus or localised provoked vestibulodynia: a Swedish register-based study.
    Möller L; Josefsson A; Bladh M; Lilliecreutz C; Sydsjö G
    BJOG; 2015 Feb; 122(3):329-34. PubMed ID: 24990073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Outcomes of term vaginal breech delivery.
    Doyle NM; Riggs JW; Ramin SM; Sosa MA; Gilstrap LC
    Am J Perinatol; 2005 Aug; 22(6):325-8. PubMed ID: 16118722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.