These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

88 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25519374)

  • 1. Evaluating the concordance between sequencing, imputation and microarray genotype calls in the GAW18 data.
    Rogers A; Beck A; Tintle NL
    BMC Proc; 2014; 8(Suppl 1 Genetic Analysis Workshop 18Vanessa Olmo):S22. PubMed ID: 25519374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison among three variant callers and assessment of the accuracy of imputation from SNP array data to whole-genome sequence level in chicken.
    Ni G; Strom TM; Pausch H; Reimer C; Preisinger R; Simianer H; Erbe M
    BMC Genomics; 2015 Oct; 16():824. PubMed ID: 26486989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluating Imputation Algorithms for Low-Depth Genotyping-By-Sequencing (GBS) Data.
    Chan AW; Hamblin MT; Jannink JL
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(8):e0160733. PubMed ID: 27537694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluating the impact of genotype errors on rare variant tests of association.
    Cook K; Benitez A; Fu C; Tintle N
    Front Genet; 2014; 5():62. PubMed ID: 24744770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Imputation of ungenotyped parental genotypes in dairy and beef cattle from progeny genotypes.
    Berry DP; McParland S; Kearney JF; Sargolzaei M; Mullen MP
    Animal; 2014 Jun; 8(6):895-903. PubMed ID: 24840560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. High imputation accuracy from informative low-to-medium density single nucleotide polymorphism genotypes is achievable in sheep1.
    O'Brien AC; Judge MM; Fair S; Berry DP
    J Anim Sci; 2019 Apr; 97(4):1550-1567. PubMed ID: 30722011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The impact of missing and erroneous genotypes on tagging SNP selection and power of subsequent association tests.
    Liu W; Zhao W; Chase GA
    Hum Hered; 2006; 61(1):31-44. PubMed ID: 16557026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. NGS allele counts versus called genotypes for testing genetic association.
    González Silos R; Fischer C; Lorenzo Bermejo J
    Comput Struct Biotechnol J; 2022; 20():3729-3733. PubMed ID: 35891781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Longitudinal data analysis in genome-wide association studies.
    Beyene J; Hamid JS
    Genet Epidemiol; 2014 Sep; 38 Suppl 1():S68-73. PubMed ID: 25112192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Low-depth genotyping-by-sequencing (GBS) in a bovine population: strategies to maximize the selection of high quality genotypes and the accuracy of imputation.
    Brouard JS; Boyle B; Ibeagha-Awemu EM; Bissonnette N
    BMC Genet; 2017 Apr; 18(1):32. PubMed ID: 28381212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Imputation of genotypes from low density (50,000 markers) to high density (700,000 markers) of cows from research herds in Europe, North America, and Australasia using 2 reference populations.
    Pryce JE; Johnston J; Hayes BJ; Sahana G; Weigel KA; McParland S; Spurlock D; Krattenmacher N; Spelman RJ; Wall E; Calus MP
    J Dairy Sci; 2014 Mar; 97(3):1799-811. PubMed ID: 24472132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The impact of multi-generational genotype imputation strategies on imputation accuracy and subsequent genomic predictions.
    Judge MM; Purfield DC; Sleator RD; Berry DP
    J Anim Sci; 2017 Apr; 95(4):1489-1501. PubMed ID: 28464096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Multiple imputation of missing genotype data for unrelated individuals.
    Souverein OW; Zwinderman AH; Tanck MW
    Ann Hum Genet; 2006 May; 70(Pt 3):372-81. PubMed ID: 16674559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of measures of correctness of genotype imputation in the context of genomic prediction: a review of livestock applications.
    Calus MP; Bouwman AC; Hickey JM; Veerkamp RF; Mulder HA
    Animal; 2014 Nov; 8(11):1743-53. PubMed ID: 25045914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Phenotypically Enriched Genotypic Imputation in Genetic Association Tests.
    Zhuang WV; Murabito JM; Lunetta KL
    Hum Hered; 2016; 81(1):35-45. PubMed ID: 27576319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Inter- and intra-reproducibility of genotypes from sheep technical replicates on Illumina and Affymetrix platforms.
    Berry DP; O'Brien A; Wall E; McDermott K; Randles S; Flynn P; Park S; Grose J; Weld R; McHugh N
    Genet Sel Evol; 2016 Nov; 48(1):86. PubMed ID: 27832740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. High concordance of bovine single nucleotide polymorphism genotypes generated using two independent genotyping strategies.
    Magee DA; Berkowicz EW; Sikora KM; Sweeney T; Kenny DA; Kelly AK; Evans RD; Wickham BW; Bradley DG; Spillane C; MacHugh DE
    Anim Biotechnol; 2010 Oct; 21(4):257-62. PubMed ID: 20967645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Fast imputation using medium or low-coverage sequence data.
    VanRaden PM; Sun C; O'Connell JR
    BMC Genet; 2015 Jul; 16():82. PubMed ID: 26168789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Hierarchical Bayesian model for rare variant association analysis integrating genotype uncertainty in human sequence data.
    He L; Pitkäniemi J; Sarin AP; Salomaa V; Sillanpää MJ; Ripatti S
    Genet Epidemiol; 2015 Feb; 39(2):89-100. PubMed ID: 25395270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comprehensive Assessment of Genotype Imputation Performance.
    Shi S; Yuan N; Yang M; Du Z; Wang J; Sheng X; Wu J; Xiao J
    Hum Hered; 2018; 83(3):107-116. PubMed ID: 30669139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.