These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

103 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25519520)

  • 1. Estimation of genomic breeding values using the Horseshoe prior.
    Pong-Wong R
    BMC Proc; 2014; 8(Suppl 5):S6. PubMed ID: 25519520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of the prior distribution of SNP effects on the estimation of total breeding value.
    Nadaf J; Riggio V; Yu TP; Pong-Wong R
    BMC Proc; 2012 May; 6 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S6. PubMed ID: 22640730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Genomic breeding value prediction using three Bayesian methods and application to reduced density marker panels.
    Cleveland MA; Forni S; Deeb N; Maltecca C
    BMC Proc; 2010; 4(Suppl 1 Proceedings of the 13th European workshop on QTL map):S6. PubMed ID: 20380760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of genomic predictions using genomic relationship matrices built with different weighting factors to account for locus-specific variances.
    Su G; Christensen OF; Janss L; Lund MS
    J Dairy Sci; 2014 Oct; 97(10):6547-59. PubMed ID: 25129495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Genomic prediction of breeding values using previously estimated SNP variances.
    Calus MP; Schrooten C; Veerkamp RF
    Genet Sel Evol; 2014 Sep; 46(1):52. PubMed ID: 25928875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Genomic selection using regularized linear regression models: ridge regression, lasso, elastic net and their extensions.
    Ogutu JO; Schulz-Streeck T; Piepho HP
    BMC Proc; 2012 May; 6 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S10. PubMed ID: 22640436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Investigating the Performance of Frequentist and Bayesian Techniques in Genomic Evaluation.
    Sahebalam H; Gholizadeh M; Hafezian H
    Biochem Genet; 2024 Jul; ():. PubMed ID: 38951354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Improving accuracy of genomic predictions within and between dairy cattle breeds with imputed high-density single nucleotide polymorphism panels.
    Erbe M; Hayes BJ; Matukumalli LK; Goswami S; Bowman PJ; Reich CM; Mason BA; Goddard ME
    J Dairy Sci; 2012 Jul; 95(7):4114-29. PubMed ID: 22720968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of genome based estimated breeding values for meat quality in a berkshire population using high density single nucleotide polymorphism chips.
    Baby S; Hyeong KE; Lee YM; Jung JH; Oh DY; Nam KC; Kim TH; Lee HK; Kim JJ
    Asian-Australas J Anim Sci; 2014 Nov; 27(11):1540-7. PubMed ID: 25358312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Genomic predictions can accelerate selection for resistance against Piscirickettsia salmonis in Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar).
    Bangera R; Correa K; Lhorente JP; Figueroa R; Yáñez JM
    BMC Genomics; 2017 Jan; 18(1):121. PubMed ID: 28143402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Weighting Strategies for Single-Step Genomic BLUP: An Iterative Approach for Accurate Calculation of GEBV and GWAS.
    Zhang X; Lourenco D; Aguilar I; Legarra A; Misztal I
    Front Genet; 2016; 7():151. PubMed ID: 27594861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Impact of fitting dominance and additive effects on accuracy of genomic prediction of breeding values in layers.
    Heidaritabar M; Wolc A; Arango J; Zeng J; Settar P; Fulton JE; O'Sullivan NP; Bastiaansen JW; Fernando RL; Garrick DJ; Dekkers JC
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2016 Oct; 133(5):334-46. PubMed ID: 27357473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Accuracy of genomic breeding values for meat tenderness in Polled Nellore cattle.
    Magnabosco CU; Lopes FB; Fragoso RC; Eifert EC; Valente BD; Rosa GJ; Sainz RD
    J Anim Sci; 2016 Jul; 94(7):2752-60. PubMed ID: 27482662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Using markers with large effect in genetic and genomic predictions.
    Lopes MS; Bovenhuis H; van Son M; Nordbø Ø; Grindflek EH; Knol EF; Bastiaansen JW
    J Anim Sci; 2017 Jan; 95(1):59-71. PubMed ID: 28177367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An efficient unified model for genome-wide association studies and genomic selection.
    Li H; Su G; Jiang L; Bao Z
    Genet Sel Evol; 2017 Aug; 49(1):64. PubMed ID: 28836943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Applying different genomic evaluation approaches on QTLMAS2010 dataset.
    Nadaf J; Pong-Wong R
    BMC Proc; 2011 May; 5 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):S9. PubMed ID: 21624179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of analyses of the XVth QTLMAS common dataset III: Genomic Estimations of Breeding Values.
    Le Roy P; Filangi O; Demeure O; Elsen JM
    BMC Proc; 2012 May; 6 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S3. PubMed ID: 22640599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of methods for the implementation of genome-assisted evaluation of Spanish dairy cattle.
    Jiménez-Montero JA; González-Recio O; Alenda R
    J Dairy Sci; 2013 Jan; 96(1):625-34. PubMed ID: 23102955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Estimation of genomic breeding values for residual feed intake in a multibreed cattle population.
    Khansefid M; Pryce JE; Bolormaa S; Miller SP; Wang Z; Li C; Goddard ME
    J Anim Sci; 2014 Aug; 92(8):3270-83. PubMed ID: 25074450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A computationally efficient algorithm for genomic prediction using a Bayesian model.
    Wang T; Chen YP; Goddard ME; Meuwissen TH; Kemper KE; Hayes BJ
    Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Apr; 47(1):34. PubMed ID: 25926276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.