299 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25521418)
1. Inter- and intrarater reliability of the Chicago Classification in pediatric high-resolution esophageal manometry recordings.
Singendonk MM; Smits MJ; Heijting IE; van Wijk MP; Nurko S; Rosen R; Weijenborg PW; Abu-Assi R; Hoekman DR; Kuizenga-Wessel S; Seiboth G; Benninga MA; Omari TI; Kritas S
Neurogastroenterol Motil; 2015 Feb; 27(2):269-76. PubMed ID: 25521418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Intra- and interrater reliability of the Chicago Classification of achalasia subtypes in pediatric high-resolution esophageal manometry (HRM) recordings.
Singendonk MMJ; Rosen R; Oors J; Rommel N; van Wijk MP; Benninga MA; Nurko S; Omari TI
Neurogastroenterol Motil; 2017 Nov; 29(11):. PubMed ID: 28585270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Applying the Chicago Classification criteria of esophageal motility to a pediatric cohort: effects of patient age and size.
Singendonk MM; Kritas S; Cock C; Ferris L; McCall L; Rommel N; van Wijk MP; Benninga MA; Moore D; Omari TI
Neurogastroenterol Motil; 2014 Sep; 26(9):1333-41. PubMed ID: 25053225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The Chicago Classification of esophageal motility disorders, v3.0.
Kahrilas PJ; Bredenoord AJ; Fox M; Gyawali CP; Roman S; Smout AJ; Pandolfino JE;
Neurogastroenterol Motil; 2015 Feb; 27(2):160-74. PubMed ID: 25469569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Inter-observer agreement for diagnostic classification of esophageal motility disorders defined in high-resolution manometry.
Fox MR; Pandolfino JE; Sweis R; Sauter M; Abreu Y Abreu AT; Anggiansah A; Bogte A; Bredenoord AJ; Dengler W; Elvevi A; Fruehauf H; Gellersen S; Ghosh S; Gyawali CP; Heinrich H; Hemmink M; Jafari J; Kaufman E; Kessing K; Kwiatek M; Lubomyr B; Banasiuk M; Mion F; Pérez-de-la-Serna J; Remes-Troche JM; Rohof W; Roman S; Ruiz-de-León A; Tutuian R; Uscinowicz M; Valdovinos MA; Vardar R; Velosa M; Waśko-Czopnik D; Weijenborg P; Wilshire C; Wright J; Zerbib F; Menne D
Dis Esophagus; 2015; 28(8):711-9. PubMed ID: 25185507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Interrater Reliability of Functional Lumen Imaging Probe Panometry and High-Resolution Manometry for the Assessment of Esophageal Motility Disorders.
Chen JW; Khan A; Chokshi RV; Clarke JO; Fass R; Garza JM; Gupta M; Gyawali CP; Jain AS; Katz P; Konda V; Lazarescu A; Lynch KL; Schnoll-Sussman F; Spechler SJ; Vela MF; Yadlapati R; Schauer JM; Kahrilas PJ; Pandolfino JE; Carlson DA
Am J Gastroenterol; 2023 Aug; 118(8):1334-1343. PubMed ID: 37042784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The effect of age on the key parameters in the Chicago classification: a study using high-resolution esophageal manometry in asymptomatic normal individuals.
Jung KW; Jung HY; Myung SJ; Kim SO; Lee J; Yoon IJ; Seo SY; Lee JH; Kim DH; Choi KD; Song HJ; Lee GH; Murray JA; Romero Y; Kim JH
Neurogastroenterol Motil; 2015 Feb; 27(2):246-57. PubMed ID: 25521290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Inter- and intra-rater reproducibility of automated and integrated pressure-flow analysis of esophageal pressure-impedance recordings.
Rohof WO; Myers JC; Estremera FA; Ferris LS; van de Pol J; Boeckxstaens GE; Omari TI
Neurogastroenterol Motil; 2014 Feb; 26(2):168-75. PubMed ID: 24164976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Differences between Chicago and traditional classifications in the diagnosis of esophageal motor disorders with high-resolution manometry and topography of esophageal pressure].
Abreu-Y Abreu AT; González Sánchez CB; Villanueva Sáenz E; Valdovinos Díaz MA
Rev Gastroenterol Mex; 2010; 75(4):412-20. PubMed ID: 21169108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Trends in diagnoses after implementation of the Chicago classification for esophageal motility disorders (V3.0) for high-resolution manometry studies.
Laing P; Bress AP; Fang J; Peterson K; Adler DG; Gawron AJ
Dis Esophagus; 2017 Dec; 30(12):1-6. PubMed ID: 28881880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Impact of spatial resolution on results of esophageal high-resolution manometry.
De Schepper HU; Kessing BF; Weijenborg PW; Oors JM; Smout AJ; Bredenoord AJ
Neurogastroenterol Motil; 2014 Jul; 26(7):922-8. PubMed ID: 24731077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Interrater and intrarater agreement of the chicago classification of achalasia subtypes using high-resolution esophageal manometry.
Hernandez JC; Ratuapli SK; Burdick GE; Dibaise JK; Crowell MD
Am J Gastroenterol; 2012 Feb; 107(2):207-14. PubMed ID: 22008895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The effect of a sitting vs supine posture on normative esophageal pressure topography metrics and Chicago Classification diagnosis of esophageal motility disorders.
Xiao Y; Read A; Nicodème F; Roman S; Kahrilas PJ; Pandolfino JE
Neurogastroenterol Motil; 2012 Oct; 24(10):e509-16. PubMed ID: 22897486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Chicago Classification of Esophageal Motility Disorders: Lessons Learned.
Rohof WOA; Bredenoord AJ
Curr Gastroenterol Rep; 2017 Aug; 19(8):37. PubMed ID: 28730503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. High resolution esophageal manometry--the switch from "intuitive" visual interpretation to Chicago classification.
Srinivas M; Balakumaran TA; Palaniappan S; Srinivasan V; Batcha M; Venkataraman J
Indian J Gastroenterol; 2014 Mar; 33(2):157-60. PubMed ID: 24105667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effects of viscosity and volume on the patterns of esophageal motility in healthy adults using high-resolution manometry.
Park JH; Lee H; Rhee PL; Park JH
Dis Esophagus; 2015; 28(2):145-50. PubMed ID: 24571425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Variant achalasia, the hole of the original classification.
Huh JY; Park MI; Park SJ; Moon W; Kim HH
Turk J Gastroenterol; 2015 Mar; 26(2):95-8. PubMed ID: 25835104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Normative data of high-resolution impedance manometry in the Chinese population.
Shi Y; Xiao Y; Peng S; Lin J; Xiong L; Chen M
J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2013 Oct; 28(10):1611-5. PubMed ID: 23730912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Does body position modify the results of oesophageal high resolution manometry?
Roman S; Damon H; Pellissier PE; Mion F
Neurogastroenterol Motil; 2010 Mar; 22(3):271-5. PubMed ID: 19814774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of two high-resolution manometry software systems in evaluating esophageal motor function.
Rengarajan A; Drapekin J; Patel A; Gyawali CP
Neurogastroenterol Motil; 2016 Dec; 28(12):1836-1843. PubMed ID: 27353018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
