These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
5. Diagnostic performance of two corrected transluminal attenuation gradient metrics in coronary CT angiography for the evaluation of significant in-stent restenosis by dual-source CT: a validation study with invasive coronary angiography. Wen D; Li J; Zhao H; Li J; Zheng M Clin Radiol; 2018 Jun; 73(6):592.e1-592.e8. PubMed ID: 29454588 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Usefulness of 64-detector row computed tomography for evaluation of intracoronary stents in symptomatic patients with suspected in-stent restenosis. Manghat N; Van Lingen R; Hewson P; Syed F; Kakani N; Cox I; Roobottom C; Morgan-Hughes G Am J Cardiol; 2008 Jun; 101(11):1567-73. PubMed ID: 18489934 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice multidetector CT angiography for detection of in-stent restenosis of vertebral artery ostium stents: comparison with conventional angiography. Lee YJ; Lim YS; Lim HW; Yoo WJ; Choi BG; Kim BS Acta Radiol; 2014 Oct; 55(8):1000-7. PubMed ID: 24107930 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of feasibility and diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice multidetector computed tomographic coronary angiography versus invasive coronary angiography versus intravascular ultrasound for evaluation of in-stent restenosis. Andreini D; Pontone G; Bartorelli AL; Trabattoni D; Mushtaq S; Bertella E; Annoni A; Formenti A; Cortinovis S; Montorsi P; Veglia F; Ballerini G; Pepi M Am J Cardiol; 2009 May; 103(10):1349-58. PubMed ID: 19427427 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Diagnostic accuracy of 320-row multidetector computed tomography coronary angiography to noninvasively assess in-stent restenosis. de Graaf FR; Schuijf JD; van Velzen JE; Boogers MJ; Kroft LJ; de Roos A; Reiber JH; Sieders A; Spanó F; Jukema JW; Schalij MJ; van der Wall EE; Bax JJ Invest Radiol; 2010 Jun; 45(6):331-40. PubMed ID: 20404736 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of coronary artery in-stent patency using 64-slice computed tomography. Zhao J; Zheng LL; Yang Y Coron Artery Dis; 2011 Dec; 22(8):540-52. PubMed ID: 21959714 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Diagnostic value of 320-slice computed tomography coronary angiography to assess in-stent restenosis]. Wang J; Chen XM; Wang SH; Ye HH; Cui HB; Du WP; Zhou HL; Feng MJ; Pan YN; Lin SY Zhonghua Xin Xue Guan Bing Za Zhi; 2012 Jun; 40(6):487-91. PubMed ID: 22943643 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Contrast-enhanced 64-section coronary multidetector CT angiography versus conventional coronary angiography for stent assessment. Das KM; El-Menyar AA; Salam AM; Singh R; Dabdoob WA; Albinali HA; Al Suwaidi J Radiology; 2007 Nov; 245(2):424-32. PubMed ID: 17890354 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Stent gap by 64-detector computed tomographic angiography relationship to in-stent restenosis, fracture, and overlap failure. Hecht HS; Polena S; Jelnin V; Jimenez M; Bhatti T; Parikh M; Panagopoulos G; Roubin G J Am Coll Cardiol; 2009 Nov; 54(21):1949-59. PubMed ID: 19909876 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Predictors for functionally significant in-stent restenosis: an integrated analysis using coronary angiography, IVUS, and myocardial perfusion imaging. Kang SJ; Cho YR; Park GM; Ahn JM; Han SB; Lee JY; Kim WJ; Park DW; Lee SW; Kim YH; Lee CW; Park SW; Mintz GS; Park SJ JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2013 Nov; 6(11):1183-90. PubMed ID: 24229771 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Clinical Evaluation of Coronary In-Stent Restenosis Using Dual-Source Computed Tomography. Wang LF; Tao LW; Huang MX; Liao WB; Zhu YZ; Zhou WB; Li H; Li D; Lu HT; Zhang BZ; Chen Z Echocardiography; 2015 Nov; 32(11):1681-7. PubMed ID: 25816917 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Non-invasive computed tomography angiography in the assessment of coronary stent patency: an Australian experience. Soon KH; Cox N; Chaitowitz I; Selvanayagam JB; Farouque O; MacGregor L; Bell KW; Lim YL Intern Med J; 2007 Jun; 37(6):360-4. PubMed ID: 17535378 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of patients with previous coronary stent implantation with 64-section CT. Schuijf JD; Pundziute G; Jukema JW; Lamb HJ; Tuinenburg JC; van der Hoeven BL; de Roos A; Reiber JH; van der Wall EE; Schalij MJ; Bax JJ Radiology; 2007 Nov; 245(2):416-23. PubMed ID: 17890353 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Incidence and classification of neointimal proliferation and in-stent restenosis in post-stenting patients at 1-year interval: findings from non-invasive coronary computed tomography angiography. Xu N; Zhang J; Li M; Pan J; Lu Z Eur J Radiol; 2014 Oct; 83(10):1816-21. PubMed ID: 25112673 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Usefulness of measuring coronary lumen density with multi-slice computed tomography to detect in-stent restenosis. Kitagawa T; Yamamoto H; Horiguchi J; Hirai N; Fujii T; Ito K; Kohno N Int J Cardiol; 2008 Feb; 124(2):239-43. PubMed ID: 17360050 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]