These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

518 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25521970)

  • 1. For your interest? The ethical acceptability of using non-invasive prenatal testing to test 'purely for information'.
    Deans Z; Clarke AJ; Newson AJ
    Bioethics; 2015 Jan; 29(1):19-25. PubMed ID: 25521970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Prenatal screening: an ethical agenda for the near future.
    de Jong A; de Wert GM
    Bioethics; 2015 Jan; 29(1):46-55. PubMed ID: 25521973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Psychological aspects of individualized choice and reproductive autonomy in prenatal screening.
    Hewison J
    Bioethics; 2015 Jan; 29(1):9-18. PubMed ID: 25521969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A new ethical landscape of prenatal testing: individualizing choice to serve autonomy and promote public health: a radical proposal.
    Munthe C
    Bioethics; 2015 Jan; 29(1):36-45. PubMed ID: 25521972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Prenatal screening: current practice, new developments, ethical challenges.
    de Jong A; Maya I; van Lith JM
    Bioethics; 2015 Jan; 29(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 25521968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Prenatal screening, reproductive choice, and public health.
    Wilkinson S
    Bioethics; 2015 Jan; 29(1):26-35. PubMed ID: 25521971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cross-cultural perspectives on decision making regarding noninvasive prenatal testing: A comparative study of Lebanon and Quebec.
    Haidar H; Vanstone M; Laberge AM; Bibeau G; Ghulmiyyah L; Ravitsky V
    AJOB Empir Bioeth; 2018; 9(2):99-111. PubMed ID: 29847254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Dynamics of prenatal screening: new developments challenging the ethical framework.
    Dondorp W; van Lith J
    Bioethics; 2015 Jan; 29(1):ii-iv. PubMed ID: 25521974
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Limits to the scope of non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT): an analysis of the international ethical framework for prenatal screening and an interview study with Dutch professionals.
    Kater-Kuipers A; Bunnik EM; de Beaufort ID; Galjaard RJH
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2018 Oct; 18(1):409. PubMed ID: 30340550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. 'Is it better not to know certain things?': views of women who have undergone non-invasive prenatal testing on its possible future applications.
    Bowman-Smart H; Savulescu J; Mand C; Gyngell C; Pertile MD; Lewis S; Delatycki MB
    J Med Ethics; 2019 Apr; 45(4):231-238. PubMed ID: 30679192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The influence of experiential knowledge and societal perceptions on decision-making regarding non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT).
    Montgomery S; Thayer ZM
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2020 Oct; 20(1):630. PubMed ID: 33076858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Women's views on the moral status of nature in the context of prenatal screening decisions.
    García E; Timmermans DR; van Leeuwen E
    J Med Ethics; 2011 Aug; 37(8):461-5. PubMed ID: 21429958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Fetal privacy and confidentiality.
    Botkin JR
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1995; 25(5):32-9. PubMed ID: 8530268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Parental duties and prenatal screening: does an offer of prenatal screening lead women to believe that they are morally compelled to test?
    García E; Timmermans DR; van Leeuwen E
    Midwifery; 2012 Dec; 28(6):e837-43. PubMed ID: 22079009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Noninvasive Prenatal Genetic Testing: Current and Emerging Ethical, Legal, and Social Issues.
    Minear MA; Alessi S; Allyse M; Michie M; Chandrasekharan S
    Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet; 2015; 16():369-98. PubMed ID: 26322648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Obstetric professionals' perceptions of non-invasive prenatal testing for Down syndrome: clinical usefulness compared with existing tests and ethical implications.
    Ngan OMY; Yi H; Wong SYS; Sahota D; Ahmed S
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2017 Sep; 17(1):285. PubMed ID: 28870159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Women's perspectives on the ethical implications of non-invasive prenatal testing: a qualitative analysis to inform health policy decisions.
    Vanstone M; Cernat A; Nisker J; Schwartz L
    BMC Med Ethics; 2018 Apr; 19(1):27. PubMed ID: 29661182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Expanded Non-invasive Prenatal Testing (NIPT) : Can the Child's Right to an Open Future Help Set the Scope?
    Claesen Z; Crombag N; Henneman L; Vermeesch JR; Borry P
    J Bioeth Inq; 2023 Mar; 20(1):41-49. PubMed ID: 36630060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Qualifying choice: ethical reflection on the scope of prenatal screening.
    Stapleton G
    Med Health Care Philos; 2017 Jun; 20(2):195-205. PubMed ID: 27631408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Fetal information as shared information: using NIPT to test for adult-onset conditions.
    Bowman-Smart H; Taylor-Sands M
    Monash Bioeth Rev; 2021 Dec; 39(Suppl 1):82-102. PubMed ID: 34971442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 26.